Cargando…

Driving-related behaviors, attitudes, and perceptions among Australian medical cannabis users: results from the CAMS 20 survey

Road safety is an important concern amidst expanding worldwide access to legal cannabis. The present study reports on the driving-related subsection of the Cannabis as Medicine Survey 2020 (CAMS-20) which surveyed driving-related behaviors, attitudes, and perceptions among Australian medical cannabi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arkell, Thomas R., Abelev, Sarah V., Mills, Llewellyn, Suraev, Anastasia, Arnold, Jonathon C., Lintzeris, Nicholas, McGregor, Iain S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10481606/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37674243
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42238-023-00202-y
_version_ 1785102015396839424
author Arkell, Thomas R.
Abelev, Sarah V.
Mills, Llewellyn
Suraev, Anastasia
Arnold, Jonathon C.
Lintzeris, Nicholas
McGregor, Iain S.
author_facet Arkell, Thomas R.
Abelev, Sarah V.
Mills, Llewellyn
Suraev, Anastasia
Arnold, Jonathon C.
Lintzeris, Nicholas
McGregor, Iain S.
author_sort Arkell, Thomas R.
collection PubMed
description Road safety is an important concern amidst expanding worldwide access to legal cannabis. The present study reports on the driving-related subsection of the Cannabis as Medicine Survey 2020 (CAMS-20) which surveyed driving-related behaviors, attitudes, and perceptions among Australian medical cannabis (MC) users. Of the 1063 respondents who reported driving a motor vehicle in the past 12 months, 28% (297/1063) reported driving under the influence of cannabis (DUIC). Overall, 49–56% of respondents said they typically drive within 6 h of MC use, depending on the route of administration (oral or inhaled). Non-medical cannabis (NMC) was perceived to be more impairing for driving than MC. Binary logistic regression revealed associations between likelihood of DUIC and (1) inhaled routes of cannabis administration, (2) THC-dominant products, (3) illicit rather than prescribed use, (4) believing NMC does not impair driving, and (5) not being deterred by roadside drug testing. Overall, these findings suggest there is a relatively low perception of driving-related risk among MC users. Targeted education programs may be needed to highlight the potential risks associated with DUIC, and further research is needed to determine whether driving performance is differentially affected by MC and NMC. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s42238-023-00202-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10481606
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104816062023-09-07 Driving-related behaviors, attitudes, and perceptions among Australian medical cannabis users: results from the CAMS 20 survey Arkell, Thomas R. Abelev, Sarah V. Mills, Llewellyn Suraev, Anastasia Arnold, Jonathon C. Lintzeris, Nicholas McGregor, Iain S. J Cannabis Res Original Research Road safety is an important concern amidst expanding worldwide access to legal cannabis. The present study reports on the driving-related subsection of the Cannabis as Medicine Survey 2020 (CAMS-20) which surveyed driving-related behaviors, attitudes, and perceptions among Australian medical cannabis (MC) users. Of the 1063 respondents who reported driving a motor vehicle in the past 12 months, 28% (297/1063) reported driving under the influence of cannabis (DUIC). Overall, 49–56% of respondents said they typically drive within 6 h of MC use, depending on the route of administration (oral or inhaled). Non-medical cannabis (NMC) was perceived to be more impairing for driving than MC. Binary logistic regression revealed associations between likelihood of DUIC and (1) inhaled routes of cannabis administration, (2) THC-dominant products, (3) illicit rather than prescribed use, (4) believing NMC does not impair driving, and (5) not being deterred by roadside drug testing. Overall, these findings suggest there is a relatively low perception of driving-related risk among MC users. Targeted education programs may be needed to highlight the potential risks associated with DUIC, and further research is needed to determine whether driving performance is differentially affected by MC and NMC. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s42238-023-00202-y. BioMed Central 2023-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10481606/ /pubmed/37674243 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42238-023-00202-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Arkell, Thomas R.
Abelev, Sarah V.
Mills, Llewellyn
Suraev, Anastasia
Arnold, Jonathon C.
Lintzeris, Nicholas
McGregor, Iain S.
Driving-related behaviors, attitudes, and perceptions among Australian medical cannabis users: results from the CAMS 20 survey
title Driving-related behaviors, attitudes, and perceptions among Australian medical cannabis users: results from the CAMS 20 survey
title_full Driving-related behaviors, attitudes, and perceptions among Australian medical cannabis users: results from the CAMS 20 survey
title_fullStr Driving-related behaviors, attitudes, and perceptions among Australian medical cannabis users: results from the CAMS 20 survey
title_full_unstemmed Driving-related behaviors, attitudes, and perceptions among Australian medical cannabis users: results from the CAMS 20 survey
title_short Driving-related behaviors, attitudes, and perceptions among Australian medical cannabis users: results from the CAMS 20 survey
title_sort driving-related behaviors, attitudes, and perceptions among australian medical cannabis users: results from the cams 20 survey
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10481606/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37674243
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42238-023-00202-y
work_keys_str_mv AT arkellthomasr drivingrelatedbehaviorsattitudesandperceptionsamongaustralianmedicalcannabisusersresultsfromthecams20survey
AT abelevsarahv drivingrelatedbehaviorsattitudesandperceptionsamongaustralianmedicalcannabisusersresultsfromthecams20survey
AT millsllewellyn drivingrelatedbehaviorsattitudesandperceptionsamongaustralianmedicalcannabisusersresultsfromthecams20survey
AT suraevanastasia drivingrelatedbehaviorsattitudesandperceptionsamongaustralianmedicalcannabisusersresultsfromthecams20survey
AT arnoldjonathonc drivingrelatedbehaviorsattitudesandperceptionsamongaustralianmedicalcannabisusersresultsfromthecams20survey
AT lintzerisnicholas drivingrelatedbehaviorsattitudesandperceptionsamongaustralianmedicalcannabisusersresultsfromthecams20survey
AT mcgregoriains drivingrelatedbehaviorsattitudesandperceptionsamongaustralianmedicalcannabisusersresultsfromthecams20survey