Cargando…

Transnasal Humidified Rapid-Insufflation Ventilatory Exchange Versus Conventional Facemask Breathing for Preoxygenation During Rapid Sequence Induction

Introduction: Transnasal humidified rapid-insufflation ventilatory exchange (THRIVE), if used for pre-oxygenation and apnoeic oxygenation, has the propensity to extend the safe apnoea time and thereby decrease the incidence of desaturation during rapid sequence induction (RSI) for emergency surgerie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Karlupia, Diksha, Garg, Kamakshi, Jain, Richa, Grewal, Anju
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10481628/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37680406
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.43063
_version_ 1785102020312563712
author Karlupia, Diksha
Garg, Kamakshi
Jain, Richa
Grewal, Anju
author_facet Karlupia, Diksha
Garg, Kamakshi
Jain, Richa
Grewal, Anju
author_sort Karlupia, Diksha
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Transnasal humidified rapid-insufflation ventilatory exchange (THRIVE), if used for pre-oxygenation and apnoeic oxygenation, has the propensity to extend the safe apnoea time and thereby decrease the incidence of desaturation during rapid sequence induction (RSI) for emergency surgeries. Hence, we proposed to evaluate the comparative efficacy of pre-oxygenation with the use of conventional facemask breathing versus THRIVE during RSI in patients undergoing general anaesthesia (GA) for emergency surgeries. Materials and methods: Eighty patients undergoing RSI under GA for emergency abdominopelvic surgery were divided randomly into two groups. Patients were preoxygenated for three minutes with 100% oxygen via either a high-flow nasal cannula at a flow of 60 L/minute using THRIVE or a tightly-held, snuggly-fitting facemask at a flow of 12L/minute using a circle system. RSI was administered followed by laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation. Arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) measured immediately after successful endotracheal intubation was our primary outcome. The lowest peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2), apnoea time, number of attempts at laryngoscopy, use of any rescue manoeuvres, and any adverse event were also recorded. Data thus collected were statistically analysed. Results: No statistically significant difference in PaO2 value was observed after successful intubation, lowest SpO(2), apnoea time, number of attempts at laryngoscopy, use of any rescue manoeuvres, and adverse event between both the groups (p>0.05). Conclusion: We conclude that though not superior to conventional facemasks, THRIVE is a safe, practicable, and efficient pre-oxygenation tool during RSI of GA for patients undergoing emergency surgeries.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10481628
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104816282023-09-07 Transnasal Humidified Rapid-Insufflation Ventilatory Exchange Versus Conventional Facemask Breathing for Preoxygenation During Rapid Sequence Induction Karlupia, Diksha Garg, Kamakshi Jain, Richa Grewal, Anju Cureus Anesthesiology Introduction: Transnasal humidified rapid-insufflation ventilatory exchange (THRIVE), if used for pre-oxygenation and apnoeic oxygenation, has the propensity to extend the safe apnoea time and thereby decrease the incidence of desaturation during rapid sequence induction (RSI) for emergency surgeries. Hence, we proposed to evaluate the comparative efficacy of pre-oxygenation with the use of conventional facemask breathing versus THRIVE during RSI in patients undergoing general anaesthesia (GA) for emergency surgeries. Materials and methods: Eighty patients undergoing RSI under GA for emergency abdominopelvic surgery were divided randomly into two groups. Patients were preoxygenated for three minutes with 100% oxygen via either a high-flow nasal cannula at a flow of 60 L/minute using THRIVE or a tightly-held, snuggly-fitting facemask at a flow of 12L/minute using a circle system. RSI was administered followed by laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation. Arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) measured immediately after successful endotracheal intubation was our primary outcome. The lowest peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2), apnoea time, number of attempts at laryngoscopy, use of any rescue manoeuvres, and any adverse event were also recorded. Data thus collected were statistically analysed. Results: No statistically significant difference in PaO2 value was observed after successful intubation, lowest SpO(2), apnoea time, number of attempts at laryngoscopy, use of any rescue manoeuvres, and adverse event between both the groups (p>0.05). Conclusion: We conclude that though not superior to conventional facemasks, THRIVE is a safe, practicable, and efficient pre-oxygenation tool during RSI of GA for patients undergoing emergency surgeries. Cureus 2023-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10481628/ /pubmed/37680406 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.43063 Text en Copyright © 2023, Karlupia et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Anesthesiology
Karlupia, Diksha
Garg, Kamakshi
Jain, Richa
Grewal, Anju
Transnasal Humidified Rapid-Insufflation Ventilatory Exchange Versus Conventional Facemask Breathing for Preoxygenation During Rapid Sequence Induction
title Transnasal Humidified Rapid-Insufflation Ventilatory Exchange Versus Conventional Facemask Breathing for Preoxygenation During Rapid Sequence Induction
title_full Transnasal Humidified Rapid-Insufflation Ventilatory Exchange Versus Conventional Facemask Breathing for Preoxygenation During Rapid Sequence Induction
title_fullStr Transnasal Humidified Rapid-Insufflation Ventilatory Exchange Versus Conventional Facemask Breathing for Preoxygenation During Rapid Sequence Induction
title_full_unstemmed Transnasal Humidified Rapid-Insufflation Ventilatory Exchange Versus Conventional Facemask Breathing for Preoxygenation During Rapid Sequence Induction
title_short Transnasal Humidified Rapid-Insufflation Ventilatory Exchange Versus Conventional Facemask Breathing for Preoxygenation During Rapid Sequence Induction
title_sort transnasal humidified rapid-insufflation ventilatory exchange versus conventional facemask breathing for preoxygenation during rapid sequence induction
topic Anesthesiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10481628/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37680406
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.43063
work_keys_str_mv AT karlupiadiksha transnasalhumidifiedrapidinsufflationventilatoryexchangeversusconventionalfacemaskbreathingforpreoxygenationduringrapidsequenceinduction
AT gargkamakshi transnasalhumidifiedrapidinsufflationventilatoryexchangeversusconventionalfacemaskbreathingforpreoxygenationduringrapidsequenceinduction
AT jainricha transnasalhumidifiedrapidinsufflationventilatoryexchangeversusconventionalfacemaskbreathingforpreoxygenationduringrapidsequenceinduction
AT grewalanju transnasalhumidifiedrapidinsufflationventilatoryexchangeversusconventionalfacemaskbreathingforpreoxygenationduringrapidsequenceinduction