Cargando…

Governance for injury care systems in Ghana, South Africa and Rwanda: development and pilot testing of an assessment tool

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to evaluate health systems governance for injury care in three sub-Saharan countries from policymakers’ and injury care providers’ perspectives. SETTING: Ghana, Rwanda and South Africa. DESIGN: Based on Siddiqi et al’s framework for governance, we developed an online asse...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Odland, Maria Lisa, Abdul-Latif, Abdul-Malik, Ignatowicz, Agnieszka, Bekele, Abebe, Chu, Kathryn, Howard, Anthony, Tabiri, Stephen, Byiringiro, Jean Claude, Davies, Justine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10481730/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37666564
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074088
_version_ 1785102038913253376
author Odland, Maria Lisa
Abdul-Latif, Abdul-Malik
Ignatowicz, Agnieszka
Bekele, Abebe
Chu, Kathryn
Howard, Anthony
Tabiri, Stephen
Byiringiro, Jean Claude
Davies, Justine
author_facet Odland, Maria Lisa
Abdul-Latif, Abdul-Malik
Ignatowicz, Agnieszka
Bekele, Abebe
Chu, Kathryn
Howard, Anthony
Tabiri, Stephen
Byiringiro, Jean Claude
Davies, Justine
author_sort Odland, Maria Lisa
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This study aims to evaluate health systems governance for injury care in three sub-Saharan countries from policymakers’ and injury care providers’ perspectives. SETTING: Ghana, Rwanda and South Africa. DESIGN: Based on Siddiqi et al’s framework for governance, we developed an online assessment tool for health system governance for injury with 37 questions covering health policy and implementation under 10 overarching principles of strategic vision, participation and consensus orientation, rule of law, transparency, responsiveness of institutions, equity, effectiveness or efficiency, accountability, ethics and intelligence and information. A literature review was also done to support the scoring. We derived scores using two methods—investigator scores and respondent scores. PARTICIPANTS: The tool was sent out to purposively selected stakeholders, including policymakers and injury care providers in Ghana, Rwanda and South Africa. Data were collected between October 2020 and February 2021. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Investigator-weighted and respondent percentage scores for health system governance for injury care. This was calculated for each country in total and per principle. RESULTS: Rwanda had the highest overall investigator-weighted percentage score (70%), followed by South Africa (59%). Ghana had the lowest overall investigator score (48%). The overall results were similar for the respondent scores. Some areas, such as participation and consensus, scored high in all three countries, while other areas, such as transparency, scored very low. CONCLUSION: In this multicountry governance survey, we provide insight into and evaluation of health system governance for trauma in three low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) in sub-Saharan Africa. It highlights areas of improvement that need to be prioritised, such as transparency, to meet the high burden of trauma and injuries in LMICs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10481730
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104817302023-09-07 Governance for injury care systems in Ghana, South Africa and Rwanda: development and pilot testing of an assessment tool Odland, Maria Lisa Abdul-Latif, Abdul-Malik Ignatowicz, Agnieszka Bekele, Abebe Chu, Kathryn Howard, Anthony Tabiri, Stephen Byiringiro, Jean Claude Davies, Justine BMJ Open Global Health OBJECTIVES: This study aims to evaluate health systems governance for injury care in three sub-Saharan countries from policymakers’ and injury care providers’ perspectives. SETTING: Ghana, Rwanda and South Africa. DESIGN: Based on Siddiqi et al’s framework for governance, we developed an online assessment tool for health system governance for injury with 37 questions covering health policy and implementation under 10 overarching principles of strategic vision, participation and consensus orientation, rule of law, transparency, responsiveness of institutions, equity, effectiveness or efficiency, accountability, ethics and intelligence and information. A literature review was also done to support the scoring. We derived scores using two methods—investigator scores and respondent scores. PARTICIPANTS: The tool was sent out to purposively selected stakeholders, including policymakers and injury care providers in Ghana, Rwanda and South Africa. Data were collected between October 2020 and February 2021. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Investigator-weighted and respondent percentage scores for health system governance for injury care. This was calculated for each country in total and per principle. RESULTS: Rwanda had the highest overall investigator-weighted percentage score (70%), followed by South Africa (59%). Ghana had the lowest overall investigator score (48%). The overall results were similar for the respondent scores. Some areas, such as participation and consensus, scored high in all three countries, while other areas, such as transparency, scored very low. CONCLUSION: In this multicountry governance survey, we provide insight into and evaluation of health system governance for trauma in three low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) in sub-Saharan Africa. It highlights areas of improvement that need to be prioritised, such as transparency, to meet the high burden of trauma and injuries in LMICs. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10481730/ /pubmed/37666564 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074088 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Global Health
Odland, Maria Lisa
Abdul-Latif, Abdul-Malik
Ignatowicz, Agnieszka
Bekele, Abebe
Chu, Kathryn
Howard, Anthony
Tabiri, Stephen
Byiringiro, Jean Claude
Davies, Justine
Governance for injury care systems in Ghana, South Africa and Rwanda: development and pilot testing of an assessment tool
title Governance for injury care systems in Ghana, South Africa and Rwanda: development and pilot testing of an assessment tool
title_full Governance for injury care systems in Ghana, South Africa and Rwanda: development and pilot testing of an assessment tool
title_fullStr Governance for injury care systems in Ghana, South Africa and Rwanda: development and pilot testing of an assessment tool
title_full_unstemmed Governance for injury care systems in Ghana, South Africa and Rwanda: development and pilot testing of an assessment tool
title_short Governance for injury care systems in Ghana, South Africa and Rwanda: development and pilot testing of an assessment tool
title_sort governance for injury care systems in ghana, south africa and rwanda: development and pilot testing of an assessment tool
topic Global Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10481730/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37666564
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074088
work_keys_str_mv AT odlandmarialisa governanceforinjurycaresystemsinghanasouthafricaandrwandadevelopmentandpilottestingofanassessmenttool
AT abdullatifabdulmalik governanceforinjurycaresystemsinghanasouthafricaandrwandadevelopmentandpilottestingofanassessmenttool
AT ignatowiczagnieszka governanceforinjurycaresystemsinghanasouthafricaandrwandadevelopmentandpilottestingofanassessmenttool
AT bekeleabebe governanceforinjurycaresystemsinghanasouthafricaandrwandadevelopmentandpilottestingofanassessmenttool
AT chukathryn governanceforinjurycaresystemsinghanasouthafricaandrwandadevelopmentandpilottestingofanassessmenttool
AT howardanthony governanceforinjurycaresystemsinghanasouthafricaandrwandadevelopmentandpilottestingofanassessmenttool
AT tabiristephen governanceforinjurycaresystemsinghanasouthafricaandrwandadevelopmentandpilottestingofanassessmenttool
AT byiringirojeanclaude governanceforinjurycaresystemsinghanasouthafricaandrwandadevelopmentandpilottestingofanassessmenttool
AT daviesjustine governanceforinjurycaresystemsinghanasouthafricaandrwandadevelopmentandpilottestingofanassessmenttool
AT governanceforinjurycaresystemsinghanasouthafricaandrwandadevelopmentandpilottestingofanassessmenttool