Cargando…

Modeling transcranial magnetic stimulation coil with magnetic cores

Objective. Accurate modeling of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) coils with the magnetic core is largely an open problem since commercial (quasi) magnetostatic solvers do not output specific field characteristics (e.g. induced electric field) and have difficulties when incorporating realistic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Makaroff, Sergey N, Nguyen, Hieu, Meng, Qinglei, Lu, Hanbing, Nummenmaa, Aapo R, Deng, Zhi-De
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: IOP Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10481791/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36548994
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/acae0d
_version_ 1785102050480095232
author Makaroff, Sergey N
Nguyen, Hieu
Meng, Qinglei
Lu, Hanbing
Nummenmaa, Aapo R
Deng, Zhi-De
author_facet Makaroff, Sergey N
Nguyen, Hieu
Meng, Qinglei
Lu, Hanbing
Nummenmaa, Aapo R
Deng, Zhi-De
author_sort Makaroff, Sergey N
collection PubMed
description Objective. Accurate modeling of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) coils with the magnetic core is largely an open problem since commercial (quasi) magnetostatic solvers do not output specific field characteristics (e.g. induced electric field) and have difficulties when incorporating realistic head models. Many open-source TMS softwares do not include magnetic cores into consideration. This present study reports an algorithm for modeling TMS coils with a (nonlinear) magnetic core and validates the algorithm through comparison with finite-element method simulations and experiments. Approach. The algorithm uses the boundary element fast multipole method applied to all facets of a tetrahedral core mesh for a single-state solution and the successive substitution method for nonlinear convergence of the subsequent core states. The algorithm also outputs coil inductances, with or without magnetic cores. The coil–core combination is solved only once i.e. before incorporating the head model. The resulting primary TMS electric field is proportional to the total vector potential in the quasistatic approximation; it therefore also employs the precomputed core magnetization. Main results. The solver demonstrates excellent convergence for typical TMS field strengths and for analytical B–H approximations of experimental magnetization curves such as Froelich’s equation or an arctangent equation. Typical execution times are 1–3 min on a common multicore workstation. For a simple test case of a cylindrical core within a one-turn coil, our solver computed the small-signal inductance nearly identical to that from ANSYS Maxwell. For a multiturn rodent TMS coil with a core, the modeled inductance matched the experimental measured value to within 5%. Significance. Incorporating magnetic core in TMS coil design has advantages of field shaping and energy efficiency. Our software package can facilitate model-informed design of more efficiency TMS systems and guide selection of core material. These models can also inform dosing with existing clinical TMS systems that use magnetic cores.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10481791
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher IOP Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104817912023-09-07 Modeling transcranial magnetic stimulation coil with magnetic cores Makaroff, Sergey N Nguyen, Hieu Meng, Qinglei Lu, Hanbing Nummenmaa, Aapo R Deng, Zhi-De J Neural Eng Paper Objective. Accurate modeling of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) coils with the magnetic core is largely an open problem since commercial (quasi) magnetostatic solvers do not output specific field characteristics (e.g. induced electric field) and have difficulties when incorporating realistic head models. Many open-source TMS softwares do not include magnetic cores into consideration. This present study reports an algorithm for modeling TMS coils with a (nonlinear) magnetic core and validates the algorithm through comparison with finite-element method simulations and experiments. Approach. The algorithm uses the boundary element fast multipole method applied to all facets of a tetrahedral core mesh for a single-state solution and the successive substitution method for nonlinear convergence of the subsequent core states. The algorithm also outputs coil inductances, with or without magnetic cores. The coil–core combination is solved only once i.e. before incorporating the head model. The resulting primary TMS electric field is proportional to the total vector potential in the quasistatic approximation; it therefore also employs the precomputed core magnetization. Main results. The solver demonstrates excellent convergence for typical TMS field strengths and for analytical B–H approximations of experimental magnetization curves such as Froelich’s equation or an arctangent equation. Typical execution times are 1–3 min on a common multicore workstation. For a simple test case of a cylindrical core within a one-turn coil, our solver computed the small-signal inductance nearly identical to that from ANSYS Maxwell. For a multiturn rodent TMS coil with a core, the modeled inductance matched the experimental measured value to within 5%. Significance. Incorporating magnetic core in TMS coil design has advantages of field shaping and energy efficiency. Our software package can facilitate model-informed design of more efficiency TMS systems and guide selection of core material. These models can also inform dosing with existing clinical TMS systems that use magnetic cores. IOP Publishing 2023-02-01 2023-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10481791/ /pubmed/36548994 http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/acae0d Text en © 2023 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Original content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.
spellingShingle Paper
Makaroff, Sergey N
Nguyen, Hieu
Meng, Qinglei
Lu, Hanbing
Nummenmaa, Aapo R
Deng, Zhi-De
Modeling transcranial magnetic stimulation coil with magnetic cores
title Modeling transcranial magnetic stimulation coil with magnetic cores
title_full Modeling transcranial magnetic stimulation coil with magnetic cores
title_fullStr Modeling transcranial magnetic stimulation coil with magnetic cores
title_full_unstemmed Modeling transcranial magnetic stimulation coil with magnetic cores
title_short Modeling transcranial magnetic stimulation coil with magnetic cores
title_sort modeling transcranial magnetic stimulation coil with magnetic cores
topic Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10481791/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36548994
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/acae0d
work_keys_str_mv AT makaroffsergeyn modelingtranscranialmagneticstimulationcoilwithmagneticcores
AT nguyenhieu modelingtranscranialmagneticstimulationcoilwithmagneticcores
AT mengqinglei modelingtranscranialmagneticstimulationcoilwithmagneticcores
AT luhanbing modelingtranscranialmagneticstimulationcoilwithmagneticcores
AT nummenmaaaapor modelingtranscranialmagneticstimulationcoilwithmagneticcores
AT dengzhide modelingtranscranialmagneticstimulationcoilwithmagneticcores