Cargando…
Modeling transcranial magnetic stimulation coil with magnetic cores
Objective. Accurate modeling of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) coils with the magnetic core is largely an open problem since commercial (quasi) magnetostatic solvers do not output specific field characteristics (e.g. induced electric field) and have difficulties when incorporating realistic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
IOP Publishing
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10481791/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36548994 http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/acae0d |
_version_ | 1785102050480095232 |
---|---|
author | Makaroff, Sergey N Nguyen, Hieu Meng, Qinglei Lu, Hanbing Nummenmaa, Aapo R Deng, Zhi-De |
author_facet | Makaroff, Sergey N Nguyen, Hieu Meng, Qinglei Lu, Hanbing Nummenmaa, Aapo R Deng, Zhi-De |
author_sort | Makaroff, Sergey N |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective. Accurate modeling of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) coils with the magnetic core is largely an open problem since commercial (quasi) magnetostatic solvers do not output specific field characteristics (e.g. induced electric field) and have difficulties when incorporating realistic head models. Many open-source TMS softwares do not include magnetic cores into consideration. This present study reports an algorithm for modeling TMS coils with a (nonlinear) magnetic core and validates the algorithm through comparison with finite-element method simulations and experiments. Approach. The algorithm uses the boundary element fast multipole method applied to all facets of a tetrahedral core mesh for a single-state solution and the successive substitution method for nonlinear convergence of the subsequent core states. The algorithm also outputs coil inductances, with or without magnetic cores. The coil–core combination is solved only once i.e. before incorporating the head model. The resulting primary TMS electric field is proportional to the total vector potential in the quasistatic approximation; it therefore also employs the precomputed core magnetization. Main results. The solver demonstrates excellent convergence for typical TMS field strengths and for analytical B–H approximations of experimental magnetization curves such as Froelich’s equation or an arctangent equation. Typical execution times are 1–3 min on a common multicore workstation. For a simple test case of a cylindrical core within a one-turn coil, our solver computed the small-signal inductance nearly identical to that from ANSYS Maxwell. For a multiturn rodent TMS coil with a core, the modeled inductance matched the experimental measured value to within 5%. Significance. Incorporating magnetic core in TMS coil design has advantages of field shaping and energy efficiency. Our software package can facilitate model-informed design of more efficiency TMS systems and guide selection of core material. These models can also inform dosing with existing clinical TMS systems that use magnetic cores. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10481791 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | IOP Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104817912023-09-07 Modeling transcranial magnetic stimulation coil with magnetic cores Makaroff, Sergey N Nguyen, Hieu Meng, Qinglei Lu, Hanbing Nummenmaa, Aapo R Deng, Zhi-De J Neural Eng Paper Objective. Accurate modeling of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) coils with the magnetic core is largely an open problem since commercial (quasi) magnetostatic solvers do not output specific field characteristics (e.g. induced electric field) and have difficulties when incorporating realistic head models. Many open-source TMS softwares do not include magnetic cores into consideration. This present study reports an algorithm for modeling TMS coils with a (nonlinear) magnetic core and validates the algorithm through comparison with finite-element method simulations and experiments. Approach. The algorithm uses the boundary element fast multipole method applied to all facets of a tetrahedral core mesh for a single-state solution and the successive substitution method for nonlinear convergence of the subsequent core states. The algorithm also outputs coil inductances, with or without magnetic cores. The coil–core combination is solved only once i.e. before incorporating the head model. The resulting primary TMS electric field is proportional to the total vector potential in the quasistatic approximation; it therefore also employs the precomputed core magnetization. Main results. The solver demonstrates excellent convergence for typical TMS field strengths and for analytical B–H approximations of experimental magnetization curves such as Froelich’s equation or an arctangent equation. Typical execution times are 1–3 min on a common multicore workstation. For a simple test case of a cylindrical core within a one-turn coil, our solver computed the small-signal inductance nearly identical to that from ANSYS Maxwell. For a multiturn rodent TMS coil with a core, the modeled inductance matched the experimental measured value to within 5%. Significance. Incorporating magnetic core in TMS coil design has advantages of field shaping and energy efficiency. Our software package can facilitate model-informed design of more efficiency TMS systems and guide selection of core material. These models can also inform dosing with existing clinical TMS systems that use magnetic cores. IOP Publishing 2023-02-01 2023-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10481791/ /pubmed/36548994 http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/acae0d Text en © 2023 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Original content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI. |
spellingShingle | Paper Makaroff, Sergey N Nguyen, Hieu Meng, Qinglei Lu, Hanbing Nummenmaa, Aapo R Deng, Zhi-De Modeling transcranial magnetic stimulation coil with magnetic cores |
title | Modeling transcranial magnetic stimulation coil with magnetic
cores |
title_full | Modeling transcranial magnetic stimulation coil with magnetic
cores |
title_fullStr | Modeling transcranial magnetic stimulation coil with magnetic
cores |
title_full_unstemmed | Modeling transcranial magnetic stimulation coil with magnetic
cores |
title_short | Modeling transcranial magnetic stimulation coil with magnetic
cores |
title_sort | modeling transcranial magnetic stimulation coil with magnetic
cores |
topic | Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10481791/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36548994 http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/acae0d |
work_keys_str_mv | AT makaroffsergeyn modelingtranscranialmagneticstimulationcoilwithmagneticcores AT nguyenhieu modelingtranscranialmagneticstimulationcoilwithmagneticcores AT mengqinglei modelingtranscranialmagneticstimulationcoilwithmagneticcores AT luhanbing modelingtranscranialmagneticstimulationcoilwithmagneticcores AT nummenmaaaapor modelingtranscranialmagneticstimulationcoilwithmagneticcores AT dengzhide modelingtranscranialmagneticstimulationcoilwithmagneticcores |