Cargando…

Is optic nerve sheath diameter a promising screening tool to predict neurological outcomes and the need for secondary decompressive craniectomy in moderate to severe head injury patients? A prospective monocentric observational pilot study

BACKGROUND: Optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) has been shown to be a noninvasive and quick method to calculate intracranial pressure (ICP) and subsequent neurologic outcomes, although with variable cutoffs. ICP can be indirectly assessed by noninvasive methods such as transcranial Doppler, ONSD, ty...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Verma, Dinesh, Sadayandi, Ramesh Andi, Anbazhagan, Sathiaprabhu, Nagarajan, Krishnan, Bidkar, Prasanna Udupi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Scientific Scholar 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10481796/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37680910
http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_318_2023
_version_ 1785102051644014592
author Verma, Dinesh
Sadayandi, Ramesh Andi
Anbazhagan, Sathiaprabhu
Nagarajan, Krishnan
Bidkar, Prasanna Udupi
author_facet Verma, Dinesh
Sadayandi, Ramesh Andi
Anbazhagan, Sathiaprabhu
Nagarajan, Krishnan
Bidkar, Prasanna Udupi
author_sort Verma, Dinesh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) has been shown to be a noninvasive and quick method to calculate intracranial pressure (ICP) and subsequent neurologic outcomes, although with variable cutoffs. ICP can be indirectly assessed by noninvasive methods such as transcranial Doppler, ONSD, tympanic membrane displacement, and fundoscopy. Knowledge regarding the diagnostic accuracy of ONSD for predicting unfavorable outcomes within 72 hours (h) of moderate and severe head injury is limited. The objective of this study was to measure ONSD measurements at 24-h intervals in moderate to severe head injury patients and to find its association with clinical outcomes in the target population. METHODS: This prospective observational study was done on moderate to severe head injury patients. ONSD was measured twice at 24-h intervals over 48 h. The clinical outcome was divided into the favorable group (patients who were in conservative treatment with a stable Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score and discharged following treatment) and the unfavorable group (patients who had a drop in GCS motor score of one or more, or expired or underwent surgical intervention) within 72 h following traumatic brain injury. The Kruskal–Wallis test, Mann– Whitney test, and receiver operating characteristic curves were used to establish the association between ONSD and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: ONSD values measured at 24-h intervals >6.1 mm (P < 0.0146) and 6.2 mm (P < 0.0001) were found to be predictors of unfavorable outcomes (expired or underwent surgery), and hence the need for a secondary decompressive craniectomy (DC). CONCLUSION: ONSD is an efficient screening tool to assess neurological outcomes in severe head injury patients. It can reliably predict the need for secondary DC at an earlier stage before secondary brain damage ensues in these patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10481796
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Scientific Scholar
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104817962023-09-07 Is optic nerve sheath diameter a promising screening tool to predict neurological outcomes and the need for secondary decompressive craniectomy in moderate to severe head injury patients? A prospective monocentric observational pilot study Verma, Dinesh Sadayandi, Ramesh Andi Anbazhagan, Sathiaprabhu Nagarajan, Krishnan Bidkar, Prasanna Udupi Surg Neurol Int Original Article BACKGROUND: Optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) has been shown to be a noninvasive and quick method to calculate intracranial pressure (ICP) and subsequent neurologic outcomes, although with variable cutoffs. ICP can be indirectly assessed by noninvasive methods such as transcranial Doppler, ONSD, tympanic membrane displacement, and fundoscopy. Knowledge regarding the diagnostic accuracy of ONSD for predicting unfavorable outcomes within 72 hours (h) of moderate and severe head injury is limited. The objective of this study was to measure ONSD measurements at 24-h intervals in moderate to severe head injury patients and to find its association with clinical outcomes in the target population. METHODS: This prospective observational study was done on moderate to severe head injury patients. ONSD was measured twice at 24-h intervals over 48 h. The clinical outcome was divided into the favorable group (patients who were in conservative treatment with a stable Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score and discharged following treatment) and the unfavorable group (patients who had a drop in GCS motor score of one or more, or expired or underwent surgical intervention) within 72 h following traumatic brain injury. The Kruskal–Wallis test, Mann– Whitney test, and receiver operating characteristic curves were used to establish the association between ONSD and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: ONSD values measured at 24-h intervals >6.1 mm (P < 0.0146) and 6.2 mm (P < 0.0001) were found to be predictors of unfavorable outcomes (expired or underwent surgery), and hence the need for a secondary decompressive craniectomy (DC). CONCLUSION: ONSD is an efficient screening tool to assess neurological outcomes in severe head injury patients. It can reliably predict the need for secondary DC at an earlier stage before secondary brain damage ensues in these patients. Scientific Scholar 2023-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10481796/ /pubmed/37680910 http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_318_2023 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Surgical Neurology International https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Verma, Dinesh
Sadayandi, Ramesh Andi
Anbazhagan, Sathiaprabhu
Nagarajan, Krishnan
Bidkar, Prasanna Udupi
Is optic nerve sheath diameter a promising screening tool to predict neurological outcomes and the need for secondary decompressive craniectomy in moderate to severe head injury patients? A prospective monocentric observational pilot study
title Is optic nerve sheath diameter a promising screening tool to predict neurological outcomes and the need for secondary decompressive craniectomy in moderate to severe head injury patients? A prospective monocentric observational pilot study
title_full Is optic nerve sheath diameter a promising screening tool to predict neurological outcomes and the need for secondary decompressive craniectomy in moderate to severe head injury patients? A prospective monocentric observational pilot study
title_fullStr Is optic nerve sheath diameter a promising screening tool to predict neurological outcomes and the need for secondary decompressive craniectomy in moderate to severe head injury patients? A prospective monocentric observational pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Is optic nerve sheath diameter a promising screening tool to predict neurological outcomes and the need for secondary decompressive craniectomy in moderate to severe head injury patients? A prospective monocentric observational pilot study
title_short Is optic nerve sheath diameter a promising screening tool to predict neurological outcomes and the need for secondary decompressive craniectomy in moderate to severe head injury patients? A prospective monocentric observational pilot study
title_sort is optic nerve sheath diameter a promising screening tool to predict neurological outcomes and the need for secondary decompressive craniectomy in moderate to severe head injury patients? a prospective monocentric observational pilot study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10481796/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37680910
http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_318_2023
work_keys_str_mv AT vermadinesh isopticnervesheathdiameterapromisingscreeningtooltopredictneurologicaloutcomesandtheneedforsecondarydecompressivecraniectomyinmoderatetosevereheadinjurypatientsaprospectivemonocentricobservationalpilotstudy
AT sadayandirameshandi isopticnervesheathdiameterapromisingscreeningtooltopredictneurologicaloutcomesandtheneedforsecondarydecompressivecraniectomyinmoderatetosevereheadinjurypatientsaprospectivemonocentricobservationalpilotstudy
AT anbazhagansathiaprabhu isopticnervesheathdiameterapromisingscreeningtooltopredictneurologicaloutcomesandtheneedforsecondarydecompressivecraniectomyinmoderatetosevereheadinjurypatientsaprospectivemonocentricobservationalpilotstudy
AT nagarajankrishnan isopticnervesheathdiameterapromisingscreeningtooltopredictneurologicaloutcomesandtheneedforsecondarydecompressivecraniectomyinmoderatetosevereheadinjurypatientsaprospectivemonocentricobservationalpilotstudy
AT bidkarprasannaudupi isopticnervesheathdiameterapromisingscreeningtooltopredictneurologicaloutcomesandtheneedforsecondarydecompressivecraniectomyinmoderatetosevereheadinjurypatientsaprospectivemonocentricobservationalpilotstudy