Cargando…

Impact of 1-hour and 3-hour sepsis time bundles on antibiotic use in emergency departments in Queensland, Australia: a before-and-after cohort study

OBJECTIVE: To determine if the introduction of an emergency department (ED) sepsis screening tool and management bundle affects antibiotic prescribing and use. DESIGN: Multicentre, cohort, before-and-after study design. SETTING: Three tertiary hospitals in Queensland, Australia (median bed size 543,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wilks, Kathryn, Mason, Donna, Rice, Michael, Seaton, Robert, Redpath, Lyndell, Gibbons, Kristen, Ergetu, Endrias, Lane, Paul, Venkatesh, Balasubramanian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10481845/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37669847
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072167
_version_ 1785102063970025472
author Wilks, Kathryn
Mason, Donna
Rice, Michael
Seaton, Robert
Redpath, Lyndell
Gibbons, Kristen
Ergetu, Endrias
Lane, Paul
Venkatesh, Balasubramanian
author_facet Wilks, Kathryn
Mason, Donna
Rice, Michael
Seaton, Robert
Redpath, Lyndell
Gibbons, Kristen
Ergetu, Endrias
Lane, Paul
Venkatesh, Balasubramanian
author_sort Wilks, Kathryn
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To determine if the introduction of an emergency department (ED) sepsis screening tool and management bundle affects antibiotic prescribing and use. DESIGN: Multicentre, cohort, before-and-after study design. SETTING: Three tertiary hospitals in Queensland, Australia (median bed size 543, range 520–742). PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients, presenting to the ED with symptoms and signs suggestive of sepsis who had blood cultures collected. These participants were further assessed and stratified as having septic shock, sepsis or infection alone, using Sepsis-3 definitions. The study dates were 1 July 2017–31 March 2020. INTERVENTION: The breakthrough series collaborative ‘Could this be Sepsis?’ Programme, aimed at embedding a sepsis screening tool and treatment bundle with weighted-incidence syndromic combined antibiogram-derived antibiotic guidelines in EDs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the rate of empirical prescriptions adherent to antibiotic guidelines during the ED encounter. Secondary outcomes included the empirical prescriptions considered appropriate, effective antibiotics administered within 3 hours and assessment of harm measures. RESULTS: Of 2591 eligible patients, 721 were randomly selected: 241 in the baseline phase and 480 in the post-intervention phase. The rates of guideline adherence were 54.0% and 59.5%, respectively (adjusted OR (aOR) 1.41 (95% CI 1.00, 1.98)). As compared with baseline, there was an increase in the rates of appropriate antibiotic prescription after bundle implementation (69.9% vs 57.1%, aOR 1.92 (95% CI 1.37, 2.68)). There were no differences between the baseline and post-intervention groups with respect to time to effective antibiotics, adverse effects or ED rates of broad-spectrum antibiotic use. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: The use of an ED sepsis screening tool and management bundle was associated with an improvement in the rates of appropriate antibiotic prescription without evidence of adverse effects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10481845
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104818452023-09-07 Impact of 1-hour and 3-hour sepsis time bundles on antibiotic use in emergency departments in Queensland, Australia: a before-and-after cohort study Wilks, Kathryn Mason, Donna Rice, Michael Seaton, Robert Redpath, Lyndell Gibbons, Kristen Ergetu, Endrias Lane, Paul Venkatesh, Balasubramanian BMJ Open Infectious Diseases OBJECTIVE: To determine if the introduction of an emergency department (ED) sepsis screening tool and management bundle affects antibiotic prescribing and use. DESIGN: Multicentre, cohort, before-and-after study design. SETTING: Three tertiary hospitals in Queensland, Australia (median bed size 543, range 520–742). PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients, presenting to the ED with symptoms and signs suggestive of sepsis who had blood cultures collected. These participants were further assessed and stratified as having septic shock, sepsis or infection alone, using Sepsis-3 definitions. The study dates were 1 July 2017–31 March 2020. INTERVENTION: The breakthrough series collaborative ‘Could this be Sepsis?’ Programme, aimed at embedding a sepsis screening tool and treatment bundle with weighted-incidence syndromic combined antibiogram-derived antibiotic guidelines in EDs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the rate of empirical prescriptions adherent to antibiotic guidelines during the ED encounter. Secondary outcomes included the empirical prescriptions considered appropriate, effective antibiotics administered within 3 hours and assessment of harm measures. RESULTS: Of 2591 eligible patients, 721 were randomly selected: 241 in the baseline phase and 480 in the post-intervention phase. The rates of guideline adherence were 54.0% and 59.5%, respectively (adjusted OR (aOR) 1.41 (95% CI 1.00, 1.98)). As compared with baseline, there was an increase in the rates of appropriate antibiotic prescription after bundle implementation (69.9% vs 57.1%, aOR 1.92 (95% CI 1.37, 2.68)). There were no differences between the baseline and post-intervention groups with respect to time to effective antibiotics, adverse effects or ED rates of broad-spectrum antibiotic use. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: The use of an ED sepsis screening tool and management bundle was associated with an improvement in the rates of appropriate antibiotic prescription without evidence of adverse effects. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10481845/ /pubmed/37669847 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072167 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Infectious Diseases
Wilks, Kathryn
Mason, Donna
Rice, Michael
Seaton, Robert
Redpath, Lyndell
Gibbons, Kristen
Ergetu, Endrias
Lane, Paul
Venkatesh, Balasubramanian
Impact of 1-hour and 3-hour sepsis time bundles on antibiotic use in emergency departments in Queensland, Australia: a before-and-after cohort study
title Impact of 1-hour and 3-hour sepsis time bundles on antibiotic use in emergency departments in Queensland, Australia: a before-and-after cohort study
title_full Impact of 1-hour and 3-hour sepsis time bundles on antibiotic use in emergency departments in Queensland, Australia: a before-and-after cohort study
title_fullStr Impact of 1-hour and 3-hour sepsis time bundles on antibiotic use in emergency departments in Queensland, Australia: a before-and-after cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Impact of 1-hour and 3-hour sepsis time bundles on antibiotic use in emergency departments in Queensland, Australia: a before-and-after cohort study
title_short Impact of 1-hour and 3-hour sepsis time bundles on antibiotic use in emergency departments in Queensland, Australia: a before-and-after cohort study
title_sort impact of 1-hour and 3-hour sepsis time bundles on antibiotic use in emergency departments in queensland, australia: a before-and-after cohort study
topic Infectious Diseases
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10481845/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37669847
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072167
work_keys_str_mv AT wilkskathryn impactof1hourand3hoursepsistimebundlesonantibioticuseinemergencydepartmentsinqueenslandaustraliaabeforeandaftercohortstudy
AT masondonna impactof1hourand3hoursepsistimebundlesonantibioticuseinemergencydepartmentsinqueenslandaustraliaabeforeandaftercohortstudy
AT ricemichael impactof1hourand3hoursepsistimebundlesonantibioticuseinemergencydepartmentsinqueenslandaustraliaabeforeandaftercohortstudy
AT seatonrobert impactof1hourand3hoursepsistimebundlesonantibioticuseinemergencydepartmentsinqueenslandaustraliaabeforeandaftercohortstudy
AT redpathlyndell impactof1hourand3hoursepsistimebundlesonantibioticuseinemergencydepartmentsinqueenslandaustraliaabeforeandaftercohortstudy
AT gibbonskristen impactof1hourand3hoursepsistimebundlesonantibioticuseinemergencydepartmentsinqueenslandaustraliaabeforeandaftercohortstudy
AT ergetuendrias impactof1hourand3hoursepsistimebundlesonantibioticuseinemergencydepartmentsinqueenslandaustraliaabeforeandaftercohortstudy
AT lanepaul impactof1hourand3hoursepsistimebundlesonantibioticuseinemergencydepartmentsinqueenslandaustraliaabeforeandaftercohortstudy
AT venkateshbalasubramanian impactof1hourand3hoursepsistimebundlesonantibioticuseinemergencydepartmentsinqueenslandaustraliaabeforeandaftercohortstudy