Cargando…

Evaluation of Choroidal Vascularity Index in Keratoconus Patients: Does Choroidal Vascularity Change in Keratoconus?

PURPOSE: To investigate the choroidal structure in keratoconic patients with different severity using the choroidal vascularity index (CVI) derived from image binarization on enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography scans (EDI-OCT). METHODS: Sixty-eight eyes from 34 keratoconus (KCN) pati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hashemian, Mohammad Naser, Ghafarian, Sadegh, Riazi-Esfahani, Hamid, Khalili Pour, Elias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10481970/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37680286
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/joco.joco_189_22
_version_ 1785102090138288128
author Hashemian, Mohammad Naser
Ghafarian, Sadegh
Riazi-Esfahani, Hamid
Khalili Pour, Elias
author_facet Hashemian, Mohammad Naser
Ghafarian, Sadegh
Riazi-Esfahani, Hamid
Khalili Pour, Elias
author_sort Hashemian, Mohammad Naser
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To investigate the choroidal structure in keratoconic patients with different severity using the choroidal vascularity index (CVI) derived from image binarization on enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography scans (EDI-OCT). METHODS: Sixty-eight eyes from 34 keratoconus (KCN) patients and 72 eyes from 36 healthy subjects were recruited in this prospective, noninterventional, comparative cross-sectional study. EDI-OCT was employed to measure choroidal parameters, including choroidal thickness (CT), total choroidal area (TCA), luminal area, stromal area, and CVI. RESULTS: Subfoveal CT was 354.6 ± 66.8 μm in the control group and 371 ± 64.5 μm in the KCN group (P = 0.86). There was no significant difference between control and KCN groups in terms of TCA (0.66 ± 0.14 mm(2) vs. 0.7 ± 0.12 mm(2); P = 0.70), luminal area (0.49 ± 0.10 mm(2) vs. 0.53 ± 0.08 mm(2); P = 0.67), and stromal area (0.16 ± 0.05 mm(2) vs. 0.17 ± 0.05 mm(2); P = 0.84). CVI was also comparable in the control group (75.4% ±3.4%) and the KCN group (75.6% ±4.5%; P = 0.43). There was also no significant correlation between other choroidal parameters and KCN severity indices. CONCLUSION: It seems that CVI as well as other choroidal biomarkers were not significantly different between patients with KCN and healthy subjects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10481970
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104819702023-09-07 Evaluation of Choroidal Vascularity Index in Keratoconus Patients: Does Choroidal Vascularity Change in Keratoconus? Hashemian, Mohammad Naser Ghafarian, Sadegh Riazi-Esfahani, Hamid Khalili Pour, Elias J Curr Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOSE: To investigate the choroidal structure in keratoconic patients with different severity using the choroidal vascularity index (CVI) derived from image binarization on enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography scans (EDI-OCT). METHODS: Sixty-eight eyes from 34 keratoconus (KCN) patients and 72 eyes from 36 healthy subjects were recruited in this prospective, noninterventional, comparative cross-sectional study. EDI-OCT was employed to measure choroidal parameters, including choroidal thickness (CT), total choroidal area (TCA), luminal area, stromal area, and CVI. RESULTS: Subfoveal CT was 354.6 ± 66.8 μm in the control group and 371 ± 64.5 μm in the KCN group (P = 0.86). There was no significant difference between control and KCN groups in terms of TCA (0.66 ± 0.14 mm(2) vs. 0.7 ± 0.12 mm(2); P = 0.70), luminal area (0.49 ± 0.10 mm(2) vs. 0.53 ± 0.08 mm(2); P = 0.67), and stromal area (0.16 ± 0.05 mm(2) vs. 0.17 ± 0.05 mm(2); P = 0.84). CVI was also comparable in the control group (75.4% ±3.4%) and the KCN group (75.6% ±4.5%; P = 0.43). There was also no significant correlation between other choroidal parameters and KCN severity indices. CONCLUSION: It seems that CVI as well as other choroidal biomarkers were not significantly different between patients with KCN and healthy subjects. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10481970/ /pubmed/37680286 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/joco.joco_189_22 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Journal of Current Ophthalmology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Hashemian, Mohammad Naser
Ghafarian, Sadegh
Riazi-Esfahani, Hamid
Khalili Pour, Elias
Evaluation of Choroidal Vascularity Index in Keratoconus Patients: Does Choroidal Vascularity Change in Keratoconus?
title Evaluation of Choroidal Vascularity Index in Keratoconus Patients: Does Choroidal Vascularity Change in Keratoconus?
title_full Evaluation of Choroidal Vascularity Index in Keratoconus Patients: Does Choroidal Vascularity Change in Keratoconus?
title_fullStr Evaluation of Choroidal Vascularity Index in Keratoconus Patients: Does Choroidal Vascularity Change in Keratoconus?
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Choroidal Vascularity Index in Keratoconus Patients: Does Choroidal Vascularity Change in Keratoconus?
title_short Evaluation of Choroidal Vascularity Index in Keratoconus Patients: Does Choroidal Vascularity Change in Keratoconus?
title_sort evaluation of choroidal vascularity index in keratoconus patients: does choroidal vascularity change in keratoconus?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10481970/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37680286
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/joco.joco_189_22
work_keys_str_mv AT hashemianmohammadnaser evaluationofchoroidalvascularityindexinkeratoconuspatientsdoeschoroidalvascularitychangeinkeratoconus
AT ghafariansadegh evaluationofchoroidalvascularityindexinkeratoconuspatientsdoeschoroidalvascularitychangeinkeratoconus
AT riaziesfahanihamid evaluationofchoroidalvascularityindexinkeratoconuspatientsdoeschoroidalvascularitychangeinkeratoconus
AT khalilipourelias evaluationofchoroidalvascularityindexinkeratoconuspatientsdoeschoroidalvascularitychangeinkeratoconus