Cargando…

Laparoscopic pyeloplasty proficiency during a residency program after adoption of a standardized simulation training program is maintained during the COVID pandemic despite reduced surgery volume

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of the standardized laparoscopic simulation training program in pyeloplasty, following its implementation and during the COVID-19 pandemic. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed at Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, a tertiary referral ce...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gorgen, Antonio Rebello Horta, Abreu, Fernando Jahn da Silva, Paludo, Artur de Oliveira, Menegolla, Mauricio Picolo, de Oliveira, Renan Timóteo, Tavares, Patric Machado, Rosito, Tiago Elias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10482452/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37267611
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2023.0021
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of the standardized laparoscopic simulation training program in pyeloplasty, following its implementation and during the COVID-19 pandemic. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed at Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, a tertiary referral center in south Brazil, in which 151 patients underwent laparoscopic pyeloplasty performed by residents between 2006-2021. They were divided into three groups: before and after adoption of a standardized laparoscopic simulation training program and during the COVID-19 pandemic. The main outcome was a combined negative outcome of conversion to open surgery, major postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo III or higher) or unsuccessful procedure, defined as need for redo pyeloplasty. RESULTS: There was a significant reduction in the combined negative outcome (21.1% vs 6.3%), surgical time (mean 200.0 min vs 177.4 min) and length of stay (median 5 days vs 3 days) after the adoption of simulation training program. These results were maintained during the COVID-19 pandemic (combined negative outcome of 6.3%, mean surgical time of 160.1 min and median length of stay of 3 days) despite a reduction in 55.4% of the surgical volume. CONCLUSION: A structured laparoscopic simulation program can improve outcomes of laparoscopic pyeloplasty during the learning curve.