Cargando…

Accessibility to Obstetric Care in South Florida Based on Insurance: A Cross-Sectional Study

Introduction Obstetrical research confirms that earlier onset prenatal care significantly improves pregnancy and birth outcomes. Initiating care in the second trimester or having less than 50% of recommended visits has been associated with an increased risk of prematurity, stillbirth, neonatal, and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kolesova, Maria, Sarantos, Sydney, Alvarez, Juan, Torres, Alfred, Pateriya, Soniya, Penalver, Manuel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10482546/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37680257
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.44781
_version_ 1785102194578554880
author Kolesova, Maria
Sarantos, Sydney
Alvarez, Juan
Torres, Alfred
Pateriya, Soniya
Penalver, Manuel
author_facet Kolesova, Maria
Sarantos, Sydney
Alvarez, Juan
Torres, Alfred
Pateriya, Soniya
Penalver, Manuel
author_sort Kolesova, Maria
collection PubMed
description Introduction Obstetrical research confirms that earlier onset prenatal care significantly improves pregnancy and birth outcomes. Initiating care in the second trimester or having less than 50% of recommended visits has been associated with an increased risk of prematurity, stillbirth, neonatal, and infant death. Studies have shown that women on public health insurance plans initiate prenatal care substantially later into pregnancy than those on private plans. The purpose of this study is to assess whether public health insurance limits Florida patients’ access to obstetric care.  Methods  A cross-sectional study was conducted by collecting data on the four most populated zip codes for Medicaid in South Florida using HealthGrades.com. The following search parameters were used: “obstetric care”, “four stars and up” and “10-mile distance”. Each obstetrician was called three times to assess appointment availability for fictional nulliparous women at eight weeks of gestation requesting prenatal care. Accepted insurance types (Medicaid, Cigna, and United Health Group (UHG)), time to an appointment in business days, and self-pay rates were recorded. Practices with invalid contact information and retired obstetricians were excluded. Summary statistics, chi-squared analysis, and a two-way t-test were conducted for the primary outcome.  Results  Seventy-one out of 178 obstetricians were successfully contacted, of which 31 physicians accepted all three insurances, and 40 physicians did not accept at least one insurance. Of those, 97.2% accepted UnitedHealthcare, 98.6% accepted Cigna, and 45.1% accepted Medicaid. There was a statistically significant difference when comparing acceptance rates between UHC and Medicaid as well as Cigna and Medicaid (p<0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in acceptance rates in the direct comparison of the two private insurances, Cigna and UnitedHealthcare (p=0.559). The average number of days until the next available appointment was 12.7 (SD= 7.2) for UnitedHealthcare, 20.0 (SD=6.7) for Cigna, and 17.0 (SD=8.6) for Medicaid. There was a statistically significant trend between the type of insurance and the time to the earliest appointment (p=0.002).  Conclusion  This study demonstrated patients enrolled in Medicaid in South Florida have significantly less access to prenatal care than those with private insurance. This evidence shows that decreased access to care from Medicaid plans can possibly increase the risk of adverse outcomes associated with inadequate prenatal care. This information should be considered by policymakers when considering future Medicaid expansion. 
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10482546
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104825462023-09-07 Accessibility to Obstetric Care in South Florida Based on Insurance: A Cross-Sectional Study Kolesova, Maria Sarantos, Sydney Alvarez, Juan Torres, Alfred Pateriya, Soniya Penalver, Manuel Cureus Obstetrics/Gynecology Introduction Obstetrical research confirms that earlier onset prenatal care significantly improves pregnancy and birth outcomes. Initiating care in the second trimester or having less than 50% of recommended visits has been associated with an increased risk of prematurity, stillbirth, neonatal, and infant death. Studies have shown that women on public health insurance plans initiate prenatal care substantially later into pregnancy than those on private plans. The purpose of this study is to assess whether public health insurance limits Florida patients’ access to obstetric care.  Methods  A cross-sectional study was conducted by collecting data on the four most populated zip codes for Medicaid in South Florida using HealthGrades.com. The following search parameters were used: “obstetric care”, “four stars and up” and “10-mile distance”. Each obstetrician was called three times to assess appointment availability for fictional nulliparous women at eight weeks of gestation requesting prenatal care. Accepted insurance types (Medicaid, Cigna, and United Health Group (UHG)), time to an appointment in business days, and self-pay rates were recorded. Practices with invalid contact information and retired obstetricians were excluded. Summary statistics, chi-squared analysis, and a two-way t-test were conducted for the primary outcome.  Results  Seventy-one out of 178 obstetricians were successfully contacted, of which 31 physicians accepted all three insurances, and 40 physicians did not accept at least one insurance. Of those, 97.2% accepted UnitedHealthcare, 98.6% accepted Cigna, and 45.1% accepted Medicaid. There was a statistically significant difference when comparing acceptance rates between UHC and Medicaid as well as Cigna and Medicaid (p<0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in acceptance rates in the direct comparison of the two private insurances, Cigna and UnitedHealthcare (p=0.559). The average number of days until the next available appointment was 12.7 (SD= 7.2) for UnitedHealthcare, 20.0 (SD=6.7) for Cigna, and 17.0 (SD=8.6) for Medicaid. There was a statistically significant trend between the type of insurance and the time to the earliest appointment (p=0.002).  Conclusion  This study demonstrated patients enrolled in Medicaid in South Florida have significantly less access to prenatal care than those with private insurance. This evidence shows that decreased access to care from Medicaid plans can possibly increase the risk of adverse outcomes associated with inadequate prenatal care. This information should be considered by policymakers when considering future Medicaid expansion.  Cureus 2023-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10482546/ /pubmed/37680257 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.44781 Text en Copyright © 2023, Kolesova et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Obstetrics/Gynecology
Kolesova, Maria
Sarantos, Sydney
Alvarez, Juan
Torres, Alfred
Pateriya, Soniya
Penalver, Manuel
Accessibility to Obstetric Care in South Florida Based on Insurance: A Cross-Sectional Study
title Accessibility to Obstetric Care in South Florida Based on Insurance: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_full Accessibility to Obstetric Care in South Florida Based on Insurance: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_fullStr Accessibility to Obstetric Care in South Florida Based on Insurance: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_full_unstemmed Accessibility to Obstetric Care in South Florida Based on Insurance: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_short Accessibility to Obstetric Care in South Florida Based on Insurance: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_sort accessibility to obstetric care in south florida based on insurance: a cross-sectional study
topic Obstetrics/Gynecology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10482546/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37680257
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.44781
work_keys_str_mv AT kolesovamaria accessibilitytoobstetriccareinsouthfloridabasedoninsuranceacrosssectionalstudy
AT sarantossydney accessibilitytoobstetriccareinsouthfloridabasedoninsuranceacrosssectionalstudy
AT alvarezjuan accessibilitytoobstetriccareinsouthfloridabasedoninsuranceacrosssectionalstudy
AT torresalfred accessibilitytoobstetriccareinsouthfloridabasedoninsuranceacrosssectionalstudy
AT pateriyasoniya accessibilitytoobstetriccareinsouthfloridabasedoninsuranceacrosssectionalstudy
AT penalvermanuel accessibilitytoobstetriccareinsouthfloridabasedoninsuranceacrosssectionalstudy