Cargando…

Clinical outcomes of the cuff wrapping technique in the modified Bentall procedure: a propensity score-matched study

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of our modified cuff wrapping Bentall (M-Bentall) procedure, which uses a cuff wrapping technique with remnant aortic root tissue. METHODS: From July 2017 to December 2021, a total of 136 patients met the inclusion criteria for th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Ling-Chen, Liu, Chuang, Fan, Shu-Ya, Sun, Yang-Xue, Guo, Hong-Wei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10482619/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37691682
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-23-201
_version_ 1785102210779054080
author Huang, Ling-Chen
Liu, Chuang
Fan, Shu-Ya
Sun, Yang-Xue
Guo, Hong-Wei
author_facet Huang, Ling-Chen
Liu, Chuang
Fan, Shu-Ya
Sun, Yang-Xue
Guo, Hong-Wei
author_sort Huang, Ling-Chen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study was designed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of our modified cuff wrapping Bentall (M-Bentall) procedure, which uses a cuff wrapping technique with remnant aortic root tissue. METHODS: From July 2017 to December 2021, a total of 136 patients met the inclusion criteria for this study. Among them, patients who underwent the modified Bentall procedure using the cuff wrapping technique were included in the M-Bentall group (n=46), while patients who underwent the classic Bentall (C-Bentall) procedure were categorized into the C-Bentall group (n=90). To reduce baseline differences between the two groups, 1:1 nearest-neighbor propensity score matching (PSM) was performed. Demographic and perioperative data were documented and compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Ninety patients were successfully matched (45 pairs). In-hospital mortality was not significantly different between the two groups after PSM (P=1). No differences were found in serious adverse events. The cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time was longer in the M-Bentall group than in the C-Bentall group (154 vs. 126 min, P=0.018). The same was also observed for the aortic cross-clamp time (113 vs. 92 min, P=0.009). Postoperatively, the peak value of D-dimer showed a significant difference, with higher values in the C-Bentall group (4.73 vs. 2.89 mg/L, P=0.019). The incidence of postoperative contrast extravasation at the aortic root (P=0.030) was higher in the C-Bentall group. The incidence of persistent aortic-right atrial shunts showed an increased tendency in the C-Bentall group (8.89% vs. 0%, P=0.117). CONCLUSIONS: The cuff wrapping technique is a safe and effective method to facilitate hemostasis of the aortic root in the modified Bentall procedure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10482619
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104826192023-09-08 Clinical outcomes of the cuff wrapping technique in the modified Bentall procedure: a propensity score-matched study Huang, Ling-Chen Liu, Chuang Fan, Shu-Ya Sun, Yang-Xue Guo, Hong-Wei J Thorac Dis Original Article BACKGROUND: This study was designed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of our modified cuff wrapping Bentall (M-Bentall) procedure, which uses a cuff wrapping technique with remnant aortic root tissue. METHODS: From July 2017 to December 2021, a total of 136 patients met the inclusion criteria for this study. Among them, patients who underwent the modified Bentall procedure using the cuff wrapping technique were included in the M-Bentall group (n=46), while patients who underwent the classic Bentall (C-Bentall) procedure were categorized into the C-Bentall group (n=90). To reduce baseline differences between the two groups, 1:1 nearest-neighbor propensity score matching (PSM) was performed. Demographic and perioperative data were documented and compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Ninety patients were successfully matched (45 pairs). In-hospital mortality was not significantly different between the two groups after PSM (P=1). No differences were found in serious adverse events. The cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time was longer in the M-Bentall group than in the C-Bentall group (154 vs. 126 min, P=0.018). The same was also observed for the aortic cross-clamp time (113 vs. 92 min, P=0.009). Postoperatively, the peak value of D-dimer showed a significant difference, with higher values in the C-Bentall group (4.73 vs. 2.89 mg/L, P=0.019). The incidence of postoperative contrast extravasation at the aortic root (P=0.030) was higher in the C-Bentall group. The incidence of persistent aortic-right atrial shunts showed an increased tendency in the C-Bentall group (8.89% vs. 0%, P=0.117). CONCLUSIONS: The cuff wrapping technique is a safe and effective method to facilitate hemostasis of the aortic root in the modified Bentall procedure. AME Publishing Company 2023-08-03 2023-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10482619/ /pubmed/37691682 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-23-201 Text en 2023 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Huang, Ling-Chen
Liu, Chuang
Fan, Shu-Ya
Sun, Yang-Xue
Guo, Hong-Wei
Clinical outcomes of the cuff wrapping technique in the modified Bentall procedure: a propensity score-matched study
title Clinical outcomes of the cuff wrapping technique in the modified Bentall procedure: a propensity score-matched study
title_full Clinical outcomes of the cuff wrapping technique in the modified Bentall procedure: a propensity score-matched study
title_fullStr Clinical outcomes of the cuff wrapping technique in the modified Bentall procedure: a propensity score-matched study
title_full_unstemmed Clinical outcomes of the cuff wrapping technique in the modified Bentall procedure: a propensity score-matched study
title_short Clinical outcomes of the cuff wrapping technique in the modified Bentall procedure: a propensity score-matched study
title_sort clinical outcomes of the cuff wrapping technique in the modified bentall procedure: a propensity score-matched study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10482619/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37691682
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-23-201
work_keys_str_mv AT huanglingchen clinicaloutcomesofthecuffwrappingtechniqueinthemodifiedbentallprocedureapropensityscorematchedstudy
AT liuchuang clinicaloutcomesofthecuffwrappingtechniqueinthemodifiedbentallprocedureapropensityscorematchedstudy
AT fanshuya clinicaloutcomesofthecuffwrappingtechniqueinthemodifiedbentallprocedureapropensityscorematchedstudy
AT sunyangxue clinicaloutcomesofthecuffwrappingtechniqueinthemodifiedbentallprocedureapropensityscorematchedstudy
AT guohongwei clinicaloutcomesofthecuffwrappingtechniqueinthemodifiedbentallprocedureapropensityscorematchedstudy