Cargando…
Comparison of uniport versus triport thoracoscopic single or combined basal segmentectomy for stage IA lung cancer
BACKGROUND: Single or combined basal segmentectomy (CBS), excluding common basal segmentectomy, is the most difficult of all types of segmentectomies. The purpose of this study was to compare the perioperative outcomes and oncological prognosis between uniport thoracoscopic basal segmentectomy (UTBS...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10482630/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37691649 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-23-477 |
_version_ | 1785102213308219392 |
---|---|
author | Dai, Zhangyi Li, Yiming Mi, Xingqi Yang, Zhenyu Gao, Jiayi Liu, Chengwu Mei, Jiandong Liu, Lunxu Pu, Qiang |
author_facet | Dai, Zhangyi Li, Yiming Mi, Xingqi Yang, Zhenyu Gao, Jiayi Liu, Chengwu Mei, Jiandong Liu, Lunxu Pu, Qiang |
author_sort | Dai, Zhangyi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Single or combined basal segmentectomy (CBS), excluding common basal segmentectomy, is the most difficult of all types of segmentectomies. The purpose of this study was to compare the perioperative outcomes and oncological prognosis between uniport thoracoscopic basal segmentectomy (UTBS) and triport thoracoscopic basal segmentectomy (TTBS). METHODS: This study retrospectively collected 300 patients who underwent thoracoscopic single or CBS at the West China Hospital of Sichuan University from April 2015 to May 2022, including 67 and 233 patients in the UTBS and TTBS groups, respectively. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to reduce confounding bias between the two groups. The primary outcome was recurrence-free survival (RFS). The secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and perioperative outcomes. RESULTS: After PSM, the UTBS group (n=64) had significantly less intraoperative blood loss than the TTBS group (n=64) (20 vs. 30 mL, P=0.001). Other perioperative outcomes, including the operation time, number of lymph nodes and lymph node stations harvested, duration of chest tube drainage, postoperative hospital stay, and postoperative complications, were comparable. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that the operative time in the group underwent single basal segmentectomy (SBS) was significantly shorter compared to the group underwent CBS (110 vs. 120 min, P=0.002). There were 5 cases of recurrence in the overall cohort and no recurrence in the matched cohort. No deaths were observed in the overall cohort. Therefore, a survival analysis was conducted only for RFS in the overall cohort. The RFS rate and OS rate of the overall cohort were 98.3% and 100%, respectively. The surgical approach (UTBS vs. TTBS) was not an independent risk factor for RFS (HR: 1.120, 95% CI: 0.342–13.051, P=0.879). CONCLUSIONS: UTBS provided similar perioperative outcomes and oncological prognoses compared to TTBS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10482630 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104826302023-09-08 Comparison of uniport versus triport thoracoscopic single or combined basal segmentectomy for stage IA lung cancer Dai, Zhangyi Li, Yiming Mi, Xingqi Yang, Zhenyu Gao, Jiayi Liu, Chengwu Mei, Jiandong Liu, Lunxu Pu, Qiang J Thorac Dis Original Article BACKGROUND: Single or combined basal segmentectomy (CBS), excluding common basal segmentectomy, is the most difficult of all types of segmentectomies. The purpose of this study was to compare the perioperative outcomes and oncological prognosis between uniport thoracoscopic basal segmentectomy (UTBS) and triport thoracoscopic basal segmentectomy (TTBS). METHODS: This study retrospectively collected 300 patients who underwent thoracoscopic single or CBS at the West China Hospital of Sichuan University from April 2015 to May 2022, including 67 and 233 patients in the UTBS and TTBS groups, respectively. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to reduce confounding bias between the two groups. The primary outcome was recurrence-free survival (RFS). The secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and perioperative outcomes. RESULTS: After PSM, the UTBS group (n=64) had significantly less intraoperative blood loss than the TTBS group (n=64) (20 vs. 30 mL, P=0.001). Other perioperative outcomes, including the operation time, number of lymph nodes and lymph node stations harvested, duration of chest tube drainage, postoperative hospital stay, and postoperative complications, were comparable. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that the operative time in the group underwent single basal segmentectomy (SBS) was significantly shorter compared to the group underwent CBS (110 vs. 120 min, P=0.002). There were 5 cases of recurrence in the overall cohort and no recurrence in the matched cohort. No deaths were observed in the overall cohort. Therefore, a survival analysis was conducted only for RFS in the overall cohort. The RFS rate and OS rate of the overall cohort were 98.3% and 100%, respectively. The surgical approach (UTBS vs. TTBS) was not an independent risk factor for RFS (HR: 1.120, 95% CI: 0.342–13.051, P=0.879). CONCLUSIONS: UTBS provided similar perioperative outcomes and oncological prognoses compared to TTBS. AME Publishing Company 2023-08-14 2023-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10482630/ /pubmed/37691649 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-23-477 Text en 2023 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Dai, Zhangyi Li, Yiming Mi, Xingqi Yang, Zhenyu Gao, Jiayi Liu, Chengwu Mei, Jiandong Liu, Lunxu Pu, Qiang Comparison of uniport versus triport thoracoscopic single or combined basal segmentectomy for stage IA lung cancer |
title | Comparison of uniport versus triport thoracoscopic single or combined basal segmentectomy for stage IA lung cancer |
title_full | Comparison of uniport versus triport thoracoscopic single or combined basal segmentectomy for stage IA lung cancer |
title_fullStr | Comparison of uniport versus triport thoracoscopic single or combined basal segmentectomy for stage IA lung cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of uniport versus triport thoracoscopic single or combined basal segmentectomy for stage IA lung cancer |
title_short | Comparison of uniport versus triport thoracoscopic single or combined basal segmentectomy for stage IA lung cancer |
title_sort | comparison of uniport versus triport thoracoscopic single or combined basal segmentectomy for stage ia lung cancer |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10482630/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37691649 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-23-477 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT daizhangyi comparisonofuniportversustriportthoracoscopicsingleorcombinedbasalsegmentectomyforstageialungcancer AT liyiming comparisonofuniportversustriportthoracoscopicsingleorcombinedbasalsegmentectomyforstageialungcancer AT mixingqi comparisonofuniportversustriportthoracoscopicsingleorcombinedbasalsegmentectomyforstageialungcancer AT yangzhenyu comparisonofuniportversustriportthoracoscopicsingleorcombinedbasalsegmentectomyforstageialungcancer AT gaojiayi comparisonofuniportversustriportthoracoscopicsingleorcombinedbasalsegmentectomyforstageialungcancer AT liuchengwu comparisonofuniportversustriportthoracoscopicsingleorcombinedbasalsegmentectomyforstageialungcancer AT meijiandong comparisonofuniportversustriportthoracoscopicsingleorcombinedbasalsegmentectomyforstageialungcancer AT liulunxu comparisonofuniportversustriportthoracoscopicsingleorcombinedbasalsegmentectomyforstageialungcancer AT puqiang comparisonofuniportversustriportthoracoscopicsingleorcombinedbasalsegmentectomyforstageialungcancer |