Cargando…
Evaluation of automated sample preparation system for lymph node sampling
BACKGROUND: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial fine needle aspiration (EBUS-FNA) has revolutionized the diagnostic and staging approach to non-small cell carcinoma and thoracic lymphadenopathy. However, obstacles to efficacy of rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) of the samples include varia...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10482632/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37691660 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-23-81 |
_version_ | 1785102213783224320 |
---|---|
author | Duke, Jennifer D. Sturgis, Charles D. Hartley, Christopher Bailey, Morgan Reid, Michal Kern, Ryan Bluestone, Alex Subramanian, Hariharan Reisenauer, Janani |
author_facet | Duke, Jennifer D. Sturgis, Charles D. Hartley, Christopher Bailey, Morgan Reid, Michal Kern, Ryan Bluestone, Alex Subramanian, Hariharan Reisenauer, Janani |
author_sort | Duke, Jennifer D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial fine needle aspiration (EBUS-FNA) has revolutionized the diagnostic and staging approach to non-small cell carcinoma and thoracic lymphadenopathy. However, obstacles to efficacy of rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) of the samples include variability in sample quality and slow and cumbersome process in the procedure room leading to extended procedure time. The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate the feasibility and specimen quality of lymph node biopsies prepared through a novel automated system for automated fixation, drying and staining compared to standard slide preparation method. METHODS: We performed a prospective, single-center pilot feasibility study of patients undergoing EBUS. Samples were split into conventional standard of care (SOC) slide preparation and preparation using the device (“instrument”). Pathologists compared the SOC slides to the slides prepared by the automated system and assessed the following metrics: nuclear and cytoplasmic quality, presence of debris/artifact, staining quality, creation of a monolayer, and ease of adequacy/diagnosis assessment. A score between 1 (lowest quality) and 3 (highest quality) was assigned to the above metrics. RESULTS: Sixty patients were recruited. One to three lymph nodes were sampled for each patient for a total of 72 samples collected. The mean scores of each assessment category showed no statistical difference between the two preparation techniques except for improved monolayer creation in the instrument samples. Thirty of thirty-one (96.8%) paired samples in the final analysis showed diagnostic equivalency between the automated slides and conventional slides; the discordant pairing was reported to be suspicious on the instrument sample and atypical on the SOC. CONCLUSIONS: Study results suggest that slides prepared by the automated system are of adequate quality for adequacy assessment with diagnostic concordance when compared to SOC slides. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10482632 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104826322023-09-08 Evaluation of automated sample preparation system for lymph node sampling Duke, Jennifer D. Sturgis, Charles D. Hartley, Christopher Bailey, Morgan Reid, Michal Kern, Ryan Bluestone, Alex Subramanian, Hariharan Reisenauer, Janani J Thorac Dis Original Article BACKGROUND: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial fine needle aspiration (EBUS-FNA) has revolutionized the diagnostic and staging approach to non-small cell carcinoma and thoracic lymphadenopathy. However, obstacles to efficacy of rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) of the samples include variability in sample quality and slow and cumbersome process in the procedure room leading to extended procedure time. The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate the feasibility and specimen quality of lymph node biopsies prepared through a novel automated system for automated fixation, drying and staining compared to standard slide preparation method. METHODS: We performed a prospective, single-center pilot feasibility study of patients undergoing EBUS. Samples were split into conventional standard of care (SOC) slide preparation and preparation using the device (“instrument”). Pathologists compared the SOC slides to the slides prepared by the automated system and assessed the following metrics: nuclear and cytoplasmic quality, presence of debris/artifact, staining quality, creation of a monolayer, and ease of adequacy/diagnosis assessment. A score between 1 (lowest quality) and 3 (highest quality) was assigned to the above metrics. RESULTS: Sixty patients were recruited. One to three lymph nodes were sampled for each patient for a total of 72 samples collected. The mean scores of each assessment category showed no statistical difference between the two preparation techniques except for improved monolayer creation in the instrument samples. Thirty of thirty-one (96.8%) paired samples in the final analysis showed diagnostic equivalency between the automated slides and conventional slides; the discordant pairing was reported to be suspicious on the instrument sample and atypical on the SOC. CONCLUSIONS: Study results suggest that slides prepared by the automated system are of adequate quality for adequacy assessment with diagnostic concordance when compared to SOC slides. AME Publishing Company 2023-07-21 2023-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10482632/ /pubmed/37691660 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-23-81 Text en 2023 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Duke, Jennifer D. Sturgis, Charles D. Hartley, Christopher Bailey, Morgan Reid, Michal Kern, Ryan Bluestone, Alex Subramanian, Hariharan Reisenauer, Janani Evaluation of automated sample preparation system for lymph node sampling |
title | Evaluation of automated sample preparation system for lymph node sampling |
title_full | Evaluation of automated sample preparation system for lymph node sampling |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of automated sample preparation system for lymph node sampling |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of automated sample preparation system for lymph node sampling |
title_short | Evaluation of automated sample preparation system for lymph node sampling |
title_sort | evaluation of automated sample preparation system for lymph node sampling |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10482632/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37691660 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-23-81 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dukejenniferd evaluationofautomatedsamplepreparationsystemforlymphnodesampling AT sturgischarlesd evaluationofautomatedsamplepreparationsystemforlymphnodesampling AT hartleychristopher evaluationofautomatedsamplepreparationsystemforlymphnodesampling AT baileymorgan evaluationofautomatedsamplepreparationsystemforlymphnodesampling AT reidmichal evaluationofautomatedsamplepreparationsystemforlymphnodesampling AT kernryan evaluationofautomatedsamplepreparationsystemforlymphnodesampling AT bluestonealex evaluationofautomatedsamplepreparationsystemforlymphnodesampling AT subramanianhariharan evaluationofautomatedsamplepreparationsystemforlymphnodesampling AT reisenauerjanani evaluationofautomatedsamplepreparationsystemforlymphnodesampling |