Cargando…

Evaluation of automated sample preparation system for lymph node sampling

BACKGROUND: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial fine needle aspiration (EBUS-FNA) has revolutionized the diagnostic and staging approach to non-small cell carcinoma and thoracic lymphadenopathy. However, obstacles to efficacy of rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) of the samples include varia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Duke, Jennifer D., Sturgis, Charles D., Hartley, Christopher, Bailey, Morgan, Reid, Michal, Kern, Ryan, Bluestone, Alex, Subramanian, Hariharan, Reisenauer, Janani
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10482632/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37691660
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-23-81
_version_ 1785102213783224320
author Duke, Jennifer D.
Sturgis, Charles D.
Hartley, Christopher
Bailey, Morgan
Reid, Michal
Kern, Ryan
Bluestone, Alex
Subramanian, Hariharan
Reisenauer, Janani
author_facet Duke, Jennifer D.
Sturgis, Charles D.
Hartley, Christopher
Bailey, Morgan
Reid, Michal
Kern, Ryan
Bluestone, Alex
Subramanian, Hariharan
Reisenauer, Janani
author_sort Duke, Jennifer D.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial fine needle aspiration (EBUS-FNA) has revolutionized the diagnostic and staging approach to non-small cell carcinoma and thoracic lymphadenopathy. However, obstacles to efficacy of rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) of the samples include variability in sample quality and slow and cumbersome process in the procedure room leading to extended procedure time. The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate the feasibility and specimen quality of lymph node biopsies prepared through a novel automated system for automated fixation, drying and staining compared to standard slide preparation method. METHODS: We performed a prospective, single-center pilot feasibility study of patients undergoing EBUS. Samples were split into conventional standard of care (SOC) slide preparation and preparation using the device (“instrument”). Pathologists compared the SOC slides to the slides prepared by the automated system and assessed the following metrics: nuclear and cytoplasmic quality, presence of debris/artifact, staining quality, creation of a monolayer, and ease of adequacy/diagnosis assessment. A score between 1 (lowest quality) and 3 (highest quality) was assigned to the above metrics. RESULTS: Sixty patients were recruited. One to three lymph nodes were sampled for each patient for a total of 72 samples collected. The mean scores of each assessment category showed no statistical difference between the two preparation techniques except for improved monolayer creation in the instrument samples. Thirty of thirty-one (96.8%) paired samples in the final analysis showed diagnostic equivalency between the automated slides and conventional slides; the discordant pairing was reported to be suspicious on the instrument sample and atypical on the SOC. CONCLUSIONS: Study results suggest that slides prepared by the automated system are of adequate quality for adequacy assessment with diagnostic concordance when compared to SOC slides.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10482632
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104826322023-09-08 Evaluation of automated sample preparation system for lymph node sampling Duke, Jennifer D. Sturgis, Charles D. Hartley, Christopher Bailey, Morgan Reid, Michal Kern, Ryan Bluestone, Alex Subramanian, Hariharan Reisenauer, Janani J Thorac Dis Original Article BACKGROUND: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial fine needle aspiration (EBUS-FNA) has revolutionized the diagnostic and staging approach to non-small cell carcinoma and thoracic lymphadenopathy. However, obstacles to efficacy of rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) of the samples include variability in sample quality and slow and cumbersome process in the procedure room leading to extended procedure time. The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate the feasibility and specimen quality of lymph node biopsies prepared through a novel automated system for automated fixation, drying and staining compared to standard slide preparation method. METHODS: We performed a prospective, single-center pilot feasibility study of patients undergoing EBUS. Samples were split into conventional standard of care (SOC) slide preparation and preparation using the device (“instrument”). Pathologists compared the SOC slides to the slides prepared by the automated system and assessed the following metrics: nuclear and cytoplasmic quality, presence of debris/artifact, staining quality, creation of a monolayer, and ease of adequacy/diagnosis assessment. A score between 1 (lowest quality) and 3 (highest quality) was assigned to the above metrics. RESULTS: Sixty patients were recruited. One to three lymph nodes were sampled for each patient for a total of 72 samples collected. The mean scores of each assessment category showed no statistical difference between the two preparation techniques except for improved monolayer creation in the instrument samples. Thirty of thirty-one (96.8%) paired samples in the final analysis showed diagnostic equivalency between the automated slides and conventional slides; the discordant pairing was reported to be suspicious on the instrument sample and atypical on the SOC. CONCLUSIONS: Study results suggest that slides prepared by the automated system are of adequate quality for adequacy assessment with diagnostic concordance when compared to SOC slides. AME Publishing Company 2023-07-21 2023-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10482632/ /pubmed/37691660 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-23-81 Text en 2023 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Duke, Jennifer D.
Sturgis, Charles D.
Hartley, Christopher
Bailey, Morgan
Reid, Michal
Kern, Ryan
Bluestone, Alex
Subramanian, Hariharan
Reisenauer, Janani
Evaluation of automated sample preparation system for lymph node sampling
title Evaluation of automated sample preparation system for lymph node sampling
title_full Evaluation of automated sample preparation system for lymph node sampling
title_fullStr Evaluation of automated sample preparation system for lymph node sampling
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of automated sample preparation system for lymph node sampling
title_short Evaluation of automated sample preparation system for lymph node sampling
title_sort evaluation of automated sample preparation system for lymph node sampling
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10482632/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37691660
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-23-81
work_keys_str_mv AT dukejenniferd evaluationofautomatedsamplepreparationsystemforlymphnodesampling
AT sturgischarlesd evaluationofautomatedsamplepreparationsystemforlymphnodesampling
AT hartleychristopher evaluationofautomatedsamplepreparationsystemforlymphnodesampling
AT baileymorgan evaluationofautomatedsamplepreparationsystemforlymphnodesampling
AT reidmichal evaluationofautomatedsamplepreparationsystemforlymphnodesampling
AT kernryan evaluationofautomatedsamplepreparationsystemforlymphnodesampling
AT bluestonealex evaluationofautomatedsamplepreparationsystemforlymphnodesampling
AT subramanianhariharan evaluationofautomatedsamplepreparationsystemforlymphnodesampling
AT reisenauerjanani evaluationofautomatedsamplepreparationsystemforlymphnodesampling