Cargando…
Is deeper always better? Evaluating deep learning models for yield forecasting with small data
Predicting crop yields, and especially anomalously low yields, is of special importance for food insecure countries. In this study, we investigate a flexible deep learning approach to forecast crop yield at the provincial administrative level based on deep 1D and 2D convolutional neural networks usi...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10482790/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37672152 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-11609-8 |
_version_ | 1785102250413129728 |
---|---|
author | Sabo, Filip Meroni, Michele Waldner, François Rembold, Felix |
author_facet | Sabo, Filip Meroni, Michele Waldner, François Rembold, Felix |
author_sort | Sabo, Filip |
collection | PubMed |
description | Predicting crop yields, and especially anomalously low yields, is of special importance for food insecure countries. In this study, we investigate a flexible deep learning approach to forecast crop yield at the provincial administrative level based on deep 1D and 2D convolutional neural networks using limited data. This approach meets the operational requirements—public and global records of satellite data in an application ready format with near real time updates—and can be transferred to any country with reliable yield statistics. Three-dimensional histograms of normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and climate data are used as input to the 2D model, while simple administrative-level time series averages of NDVI and climate data to the 1D model. The best model architecture is automatically identified during efficient and extensive hyperparameter optimization. To demonstrate the relevance of this approach, we hindcast (2002–2018) the yields of Algeria’s three main crops (barley, durum and soft wheat) and contrast the model’s performance with machine learning algorithms and conventional benchmark models used in a previous study. Simple benchmarks such as peak NDVI remained challenging to outperform while machine learning models were superior to deep learning models for all forecasting months and all tested crops. We attribute the poor performance of deep learning to the small size of the dataset available. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10482790 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104827902023-09-08 Is deeper always better? Evaluating deep learning models for yield forecasting with small data Sabo, Filip Meroni, Michele Waldner, François Rembold, Felix Environ Monit Assess Research Predicting crop yields, and especially anomalously low yields, is of special importance for food insecure countries. In this study, we investigate a flexible deep learning approach to forecast crop yield at the provincial administrative level based on deep 1D and 2D convolutional neural networks using limited data. This approach meets the operational requirements—public and global records of satellite data in an application ready format with near real time updates—and can be transferred to any country with reliable yield statistics. Three-dimensional histograms of normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and climate data are used as input to the 2D model, while simple administrative-level time series averages of NDVI and climate data to the 1D model. The best model architecture is automatically identified during efficient and extensive hyperparameter optimization. To demonstrate the relevance of this approach, we hindcast (2002–2018) the yields of Algeria’s three main crops (barley, durum and soft wheat) and contrast the model’s performance with machine learning algorithms and conventional benchmark models used in a previous study. Simple benchmarks such as peak NDVI remained challenging to outperform while machine learning models were superior to deep learning models for all forecasting months and all tested crops. We attribute the poor performance of deep learning to the small size of the dataset available. Springer International Publishing 2023-09-06 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10482790/ /pubmed/37672152 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-11609-8 Text en © European Union 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Sabo, Filip Meroni, Michele Waldner, François Rembold, Felix Is deeper always better? Evaluating deep learning models for yield forecasting with small data |
title | Is deeper always better? Evaluating deep learning models for yield forecasting with small data |
title_full | Is deeper always better? Evaluating deep learning models for yield forecasting with small data |
title_fullStr | Is deeper always better? Evaluating deep learning models for yield forecasting with small data |
title_full_unstemmed | Is deeper always better? Evaluating deep learning models for yield forecasting with small data |
title_short | Is deeper always better? Evaluating deep learning models for yield forecasting with small data |
title_sort | is deeper always better? evaluating deep learning models for yield forecasting with small data |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10482790/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37672152 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-11609-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sabofilip isdeeperalwaysbetterevaluatingdeeplearningmodelsforyieldforecastingwithsmalldata AT meronimichele isdeeperalwaysbetterevaluatingdeeplearningmodelsforyieldforecastingwithsmalldata AT waldnerfrancois isdeeperalwaysbetterevaluatingdeeplearningmodelsforyieldforecastingwithsmalldata AT remboldfelix isdeeperalwaysbetterevaluatingdeeplearningmodelsforyieldforecastingwithsmalldata |