Cargando…
How do psychology researchers interpret the results of multiple replication studies?
Employing two vignette studies, we examined how psychology researchers interpret the results of a set of four experiments that all test a given theory. In both studies, we found that participants’ belief in the theory increased with the number of statistically significant results, and that the resul...
Autores principales: | van den Akker, Olmo R., Wicherts, Jelte M., Alvarez, Linda Dominguez, Bakker, Marjan, van Assen, Marcel A. L. M. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10482796/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36635588 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-022-02235-5 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Recommendations in pre-registrations and internal review board proposals promote formal power analyses but do not increase sample size
por: Bakker, Marjan, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
The (mis)reporting of statistical results in psychology journals
por: Bakker, Marjan, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Statistical Reporting Errors and Collaboration on Statistical Analyses in Psychological Science
por: Veldkamp, Coosje L. S., et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Outlier Removal and the Relation with Reporting Errors and Quality of Psychological Research
por: Bakker, Marjan, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Degrees of Freedom in Planning, Running, Analyzing, and Reporting Psychological Studies: A Checklist to Avoid p-Hacking
por: Wicherts, Jelte M., et al.
Publicado: (2016)