Cargando…
Cost-effectiveness analysis of anlotinib as a third-line or further treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer in China
BACKGROUND: The health expenditure on treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is enormous, especially in third-line or further therapy. Cost-effectiveness analysis for the treatment of advanced NSCLC is particularly important. Anlotinib has been approved by the China Food and Drug A...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10483086/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37691869 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-23-456 |
_version_ | 1785102302896455680 |
---|---|
author | Zhu, Qiuyan Ni, Ronghua Guan, Xin |
author_facet | Zhu, Qiuyan Ni, Ronghua Guan, Xin |
author_sort | Zhu, Qiuyan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The health expenditure on treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is enormous, especially in third-line or further therapy. Cost-effectiveness analysis for the treatment of advanced NSCLC is particularly important. Anlotinib has been approved by the China Food and Drug Administration (CFDA) for the third-line or further treatment of advanced NSCLC. The price of anlotinib in China fell in 2022. Thus, this study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of anlotinib in the third-line or further treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC based on the newest price from the Chinese health-care system perspective. METHODS: A Markov model was developed to compare the lifetime costs and effectiveness of anlotinib and a placebo in the third-line or further treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC based on outcome data from the ALTER 0303 phase-3 randomized clinical trial, which included 437 patients with advanced NSCLC and investigated the efficacy of anlotinib. The lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were estimated. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the model uncertainty. RESULTS: Anlotinib provided an additional 0.1161 QALYs compared to the placebo. The corresponding incremental cost was ¥22,729. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of anlotinib compared to the placebo was ¥195,768 per QALY. From the perspective of the Chinese health-care system, anlotinib was found to be cost-effective compared to the placebo in the third-line or further treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of ¥242,928 per QALY. Moreover, 1-way sensitivity analysis found that the results were sensitive to the utility of progressive disease (PD). The lower this parameter was, the higher the probability of ICER for anlotinib not being cost-effective. The cost-effectiveness acceptability curves showed that the base-case analysis results were relatively stable. CONCLUSIONS: Considering the clinical efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of anlotinib, it may be a valuable third-line or further treatment for advanced NSCLC in China. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10483086 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104830862023-09-08 Cost-effectiveness analysis of anlotinib as a third-line or further treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer in China Zhu, Qiuyan Ni, Ronghua Guan, Xin Transl Lung Cancer Res Original Article BACKGROUND: The health expenditure on treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is enormous, especially in third-line or further therapy. Cost-effectiveness analysis for the treatment of advanced NSCLC is particularly important. Anlotinib has been approved by the China Food and Drug Administration (CFDA) for the third-line or further treatment of advanced NSCLC. The price of anlotinib in China fell in 2022. Thus, this study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of anlotinib in the third-line or further treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC based on the newest price from the Chinese health-care system perspective. METHODS: A Markov model was developed to compare the lifetime costs and effectiveness of anlotinib and a placebo in the third-line or further treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC based on outcome data from the ALTER 0303 phase-3 randomized clinical trial, which included 437 patients with advanced NSCLC and investigated the efficacy of anlotinib. The lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were estimated. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the model uncertainty. RESULTS: Anlotinib provided an additional 0.1161 QALYs compared to the placebo. The corresponding incremental cost was ¥22,729. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of anlotinib compared to the placebo was ¥195,768 per QALY. From the perspective of the Chinese health-care system, anlotinib was found to be cost-effective compared to the placebo in the third-line or further treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of ¥242,928 per QALY. Moreover, 1-way sensitivity analysis found that the results were sensitive to the utility of progressive disease (PD). The lower this parameter was, the higher the probability of ICER for anlotinib not being cost-effective. The cost-effectiveness acceptability curves showed that the base-case analysis results were relatively stable. CONCLUSIONS: Considering the clinical efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of anlotinib, it may be a valuable third-line or further treatment for advanced NSCLC in China. AME Publishing Company 2023-08-28 2023-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10483086/ /pubmed/37691869 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-23-456 Text en 2023 Translational Lung Cancer Research. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Zhu, Qiuyan Ni, Ronghua Guan, Xin Cost-effectiveness analysis of anlotinib as a third-line or further treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer in China |
title | Cost-effectiveness analysis of anlotinib as a third-line or further treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer in China |
title_full | Cost-effectiveness analysis of anlotinib as a third-line or further treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer in China |
title_fullStr | Cost-effectiveness analysis of anlotinib as a third-line or further treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer in China |
title_full_unstemmed | Cost-effectiveness analysis of anlotinib as a third-line or further treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer in China |
title_short | Cost-effectiveness analysis of anlotinib as a third-line or further treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer in China |
title_sort | cost-effectiveness analysis of anlotinib as a third-line or further treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer in china |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10483086/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37691869 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-23-456 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhuqiuyan costeffectivenessanalysisofanlotinibasathirdlineorfurthertreatmentforadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerinchina AT nironghua costeffectivenessanalysisofanlotinibasathirdlineorfurthertreatmentforadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerinchina AT guanxin costeffectivenessanalysisofanlotinibasathirdlineorfurthertreatmentforadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerinchina |