Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness analysis of anlotinib as a third-line or further treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer in China

BACKGROUND: The health expenditure on treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is enormous, especially in third-line or further therapy. Cost-effectiveness analysis for the treatment of advanced NSCLC is particularly important. Anlotinib has been approved by the China Food and Drug A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhu, Qiuyan, Ni, Ronghua, Guan, Xin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10483086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37691869
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-23-456
_version_ 1785102302896455680
author Zhu, Qiuyan
Ni, Ronghua
Guan, Xin
author_facet Zhu, Qiuyan
Ni, Ronghua
Guan, Xin
author_sort Zhu, Qiuyan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The health expenditure on treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is enormous, especially in third-line or further therapy. Cost-effectiveness analysis for the treatment of advanced NSCLC is particularly important. Anlotinib has been approved by the China Food and Drug Administration (CFDA) for the third-line or further treatment of advanced NSCLC. The price of anlotinib in China fell in 2022. Thus, this study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of anlotinib in the third-line or further treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC based on the newest price from the Chinese health-care system perspective. METHODS: A Markov model was developed to compare the lifetime costs and effectiveness of anlotinib and a placebo in the third-line or further treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC based on outcome data from the ALTER 0303 phase-3 randomized clinical trial, which included 437 patients with advanced NSCLC and investigated the efficacy of anlotinib. The lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were estimated. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the model uncertainty. RESULTS: Anlotinib provided an additional 0.1161 QALYs compared to the placebo. The corresponding incremental cost was ¥22,729. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of anlotinib compared to the placebo was ¥195,768 per QALY. From the perspective of the Chinese health-care system, anlotinib was found to be cost-effective compared to the placebo in the third-line or further treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of ¥242,928 per QALY. Moreover, 1-way sensitivity analysis found that the results were sensitive to the utility of progressive disease (PD). The lower this parameter was, the higher the probability of ICER for anlotinib not being cost-effective. The cost-effectiveness acceptability curves showed that the base-case analysis results were relatively stable. CONCLUSIONS: Considering the clinical efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of anlotinib, it may be a valuable third-line or further treatment for advanced NSCLC in China.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10483086
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104830862023-09-08 Cost-effectiveness analysis of anlotinib as a third-line or further treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer in China Zhu, Qiuyan Ni, Ronghua Guan, Xin Transl Lung Cancer Res Original Article BACKGROUND: The health expenditure on treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is enormous, especially in third-line or further therapy. Cost-effectiveness analysis for the treatment of advanced NSCLC is particularly important. Anlotinib has been approved by the China Food and Drug Administration (CFDA) for the third-line or further treatment of advanced NSCLC. The price of anlotinib in China fell in 2022. Thus, this study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of anlotinib in the third-line or further treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC based on the newest price from the Chinese health-care system perspective. METHODS: A Markov model was developed to compare the lifetime costs and effectiveness of anlotinib and a placebo in the third-line or further treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC based on outcome data from the ALTER 0303 phase-3 randomized clinical trial, which included 437 patients with advanced NSCLC and investigated the efficacy of anlotinib. The lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were estimated. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the model uncertainty. RESULTS: Anlotinib provided an additional 0.1161 QALYs compared to the placebo. The corresponding incremental cost was ¥22,729. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of anlotinib compared to the placebo was ¥195,768 per QALY. From the perspective of the Chinese health-care system, anlotinib was found to be cost-effective compared to the placebo in the third-line or further treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of ¥242,928 per QALY. Moreover, 1-way sensitivity analysis found that the results were sensitive to the utility of progressive disease (PD). The lower this parameter was, the higher the probability of ICER for anlotinib not being cost-effective. The cost-effectiveness acceptability curves showed that the base-case analysis results were relatively stable. CONCLUSIONS: Considering the clinical efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of anlotinib, it may be a valuable third-line or further treatment for advanced NSCLC in China. AME Publishing Company 2023-08-28 2023-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10483086/ /pubmed/37691869 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-23-456 Text en 2023 Translational Lung Cancer Research. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Zhu, Qiuyan
Ni, Ronghua
Guan, Xin
Cost-effectiveness analysis of anlotinib as a third-line or further treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer in China
title Cost-effectiveness analysis of anlotinib as a third-line or further treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer in China
title_full Cost-effectiveness analysis of anlotinib as a third-line or further treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer in China
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness analysis of anlotinib as a third-line or further treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer in China
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness analysis of anlotinib as a third-line or further treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer in China
title_short Cost-effectiveness analysis of anlotinib as a third-line or further treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer in China
title_sort cost-effectiveness analysis of anlotinib as a third-line or further treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer in china
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10483086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37691869
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-23-456
work_keys_str_mv AT zhuqiuyan costeffectivenessanalysisofanlotinibasathirdlineorfurthertreatmentforadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerinchina
AT nironghua costeffectivenessanalysisofanlotinibasathirdlineorfurthertreatmentforadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerinchina
AT guanxin costeffectivenessanalysisofanlotinibasathirdlineorfurthertreatmentforadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerinchina