Cargando…

Feasibility of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients With Very Severe Aortic Stenosis

Background: Very severe aortic stenosis (AS) has a poor prognosis even in asymptomatic patients, and asymptomatic very severe AS is a Class IIa indication for aortic valve replacement, although the safety and effectiveness of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for very severe AS is not w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kobayashi, Yoshikuni, Izumo, Masaki, Okuyama, Kazuaki, Uenomachi, Nina, Shoji, Tatsuro, Kai, Takahiko, Okuno, Taishi, Sato, Yukio, Kuwata, Shingo, Koga, Masashi, Ishibashi, Yuki, Tanabe, Yasuhiro, Miyairi, Takeshi, Akashi, Yoshihiro J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Japanese Circulation Society 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10483111/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37693232
http://dx.doi.org/10.1253/circrep.CR-23-0063
Descripción
Sumario:Background: Very severe aortic stenosis (AS) has a poor prognosis even in asymptomatic patients, and asymptomatic very severe AS is a Class IIa indication for aortic valve replacement, although the safety and effectiveness of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for very severe AS is not well-established. Methods and Results: This study included 366 patients undergoing TAVI at a single center, with 85 and 281 patients in the very severe AS (peak velocity ≥5 m/s or mean pressure gradient (PG) ≥60 mmHg) and severe AS groups, respectively. Procedural and clinical outcomes at 1-year follow-up were compared between groups. The calcium scores were significantly higher in the very severe AS group (2,864.5 vs. 1,405.8 arbitrary units [AU] (P<0.001). Although the patient-prosthesis mismatch rate was higher in the very severe AS group (38.3% vs. 25.7%; P=0.029), there was no significant difference in the early safety and clinical efficacy between the groups (16.5% vs. 17.1% and 12.0% vs. 18.9%, respectively). Similarly, there was no significant difference in all-cause mortality at 1 year (4.8% vs. 9.8%). Conclusions: Despite a higher incidence of prosthesis–patient mismatch in those with very severe AS, the procedural and clinical outcomes were comparable to those in patients with severe AS. TAVI may be a reasonable treatment option for very severe AS.