Cargando…

Risk of estrogen receptor–specific breast cancer by family history of estrogen receptor subtypes and other cancers

BACKGROUND: The extent to which the risk of estrogen receptor (ER)–specific breast cancer is associated with ER status of breast cancer and other cancers among first-degree relatives is unclear. METHODS: This population-based cohort included 464 707 cancer-free women in Stockholm, Sweden, during 197...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Qiao-Li, Zhang, Yuqi, Zeng, Erwei, Grassmann, Felix, He, Wei, Czene, Kamila
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10483332/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37243749
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djad104
_version_ 1785102352892559360
author Wang, Qiao-Li
Zhang, Yuqi
Zeng, Erwei
Grassmann, Felix
He, Wei
Czene, Kamila
author_facet Wang, Qiao-Li
Zhang, Yuqi
Zeng, Erwei
Grassmann, Felix
He, Wei
Czene, Kamila
author_sort Wang, Qiao-Li
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The extent to which the risk of estrogen receptor (ER)–specific breast cancer is associated with ER status of breast cancer and other cancers among first-degree relatives is unclear. METHODS: This population-based cohort included 464 707 cancer-free women in Stockholm, Sweden, during 1978-2019. For ER-negative and ER-positive breast cancers, we estimated hazard ratios (HRs) associated with ER status of female first-degree relatives with breast cancer and of other cancers in all first-degree relatives. Associations between ER-negative and ER-positive status by family cancer history were estimated using logistic regression in a case-only design. RESULTS: Women with familial ER-positive breast cancer had 1.87 times (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.77 to 1.97) higher risk of ER-positive subtype, whereas the corresponding hazard ratio for ER-negative was 2.54 (95% CI = 2.08 to 3.10) when having familial ER-negative breast cancer. The risk increased with an increasing number of female first-degree relatives having concordant subtypes and younger age at diagnosis (P(trend) <.001 for both). Nonbreast cancers among first-degree relatives were associated with both ER-positive (HR = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.10 to 1.17) and ER-negative (HR = 1.08, 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.16) breast cancers. Compared with women with ER-positive breast cancer, women with ER-negative breast cancer were more likely to have family history of liver (odds ratio [OR] = 1.33, 95% CI = 1.05 to 1.67), ovary (OR = 1.28, 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.61), and testicle cancer (OR = 1.79, 95% CI = 1.01 to 3.16) but less likely to have family history of endometrial cancer (OR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.60 to 1.00) and leukemia (OR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.56 to 0.91). CONCLUSIONS: Risk of ER-specific breast cancer differs according to ER status of female first-degree relatives with breast cancer and some other cancers of first-degree relatives. This family history information should be considered in the individual risk prediction for ER subtypes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10483332
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104833322023-09-08 Risk of estrogen receptor–specific breast cancer by family history of estrogen receptor subtypes and other cancers Wang, Qiao-Li Zhang, Yuqi Zeng, Erwei Grassmann, Felix He, Wei Czene, Kamila J Natl Cancer Inst Article BACKGROUND: The extent to which the risk of estrogen receptor (ER)–specific breast cancer is associated with ER status of breast cancer and other cancers among first-degree relatives is unclear. METHODS: This population-based cohort included 464 707 cancer-free women in Stockholm, Sweden, during 1978-2019. For ER-negative and ER-positive breast cancers, we estimated hazard ratios (HRs) associated with ER status of female first-degree relatives with breast cancer and of other cancers in all first-degree relatives. Associations between ER-negative and ER-positive status by family cancer history were estimated using logistic regression in a case-only design. RESULTS: Women with familial ER-positive breast cancer had 1.87 times (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.77 to 1.97) higher risk of ER-positive subtype, whereas the corresponding hazard ratio for ER-negative was 2.54 (95% CI = 2.08 to 3.10) when having familial ER-negative breast cancer. The risk increased with an increasing number of female first-degree relatives having concordant subtypes and younger age at diagnosis (P(trend) <.001 for both). Nonbreast cancers among first-degree relatives were associated with both ER-positive (HR = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.10 to 1.17) and ER-negative (HR = 1.08, 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.16) breast cancers. Compared with women with ER-positive breast cancer, women with ER-negative breast cancer were more likely to have family history of liver (odds ratio [OR] = 1.33, 95% CI = 1.05 to 1.67), ovary (OR = 1.28, 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.61), and testicle cancer (OR = 1.79, 95% CI = 1.01 to 3.16) but less likely to have family history of endometrial cancer (OR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.60 to 1.00) and leukemia (OR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.56 to 0.91). CONCLUSIONS: Risk of ER-specific breast cancer differs according to ER status of female first-degree relatives with breast cancer and some other cancers of first-degree relatives. This family history information should be considered in the individual risk prediction for ER subtypes. Oxford University Press 2023-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10483332/ /pubmed/37243749 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djad104 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Article
Wang, Qiao-Li
Zhang, Yuqi
Zeng, Erwei
Grassmann, Felix
He, Wei
Czene, Kamila
Risk of estrogen receptor–specific breast cancer by family history of estrogen receptor subtypes and other cancers
title Risk of estrogen receptor–specific breast cancer by family history of estrogen receptor subtypes and other cancers
title_full Risk of estrogen receptor–specific breast cancer by family history of estrogen receptor subtypes and other cancers
title_fullStr Risk of estrogen receptor–specific breast cancer by family history of estrogen receptor subtypes and other cancers
title_full_unstemmed Risk of estrogen receptor–specific breast cancer by family history of estrogen receptor subtypes and other cancers
title_short Risk of estrogen receptor–specific breast cancer by family history of estrogen receptor subtypes and other cancers
title_sort risk of estrogen receptor–specific breast cancer by family history of estrogen receptor subtypes and other cancers
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10483332/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37243749
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djad104
work_keys_str_mv AT wangqiaoli riskofestrogenreceptorspecificbreastcancerbyfamilyhistoryofestrogenreceptorsubtypesandothercancers
AT zhangyuqi riskofestrogenreceptorspecificbreastcancerbyfamilyhistoryofestrogenreceptorsubtypesandothercancers
AT zengerwei riskofestrogenreceptorspecificbreastcancerbyfamilyhistoryofestrogenreceptorsubtypesandothercancers
AT grassmannfelix riskofestrogenreceptorspecificbreastcancerbyfamilyhistoryofestrogenreceptorsubtypesandothercancers
AT hewei riskofestrogenreceptorspecificbreastcancerbyfamilyhistoryofestrogenreceptorsubtypesandothercancers
AT czenekamila riskofestrogenreceptorspecificbreastcancerbyfamilyhistoryofestrogenreceptorsubtypesandothercancers