Cargando…

Face Name Associative Memory Exam and biomarker status in the ARMADA study: Advancing reliable measurement in Alzheimer's disease and cognitive aging

The Face Name Associative Memory Exam (FNAME) was introduced into the NIH Toolbox as part of the ARMADA study and establishes normative data for diverse participants, ages 64 to 85+, and proposes cutoff scores between biomarker positive versus negative (+/−) groups. The FNAME was administered to 257...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rentz, Dorene M., Klinger, Hannah M., Samaroo, Aubryn, Fitzpatrick, Colleen, Schneider, Olivia R., Amagai, Saki, Peipert, John Devin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10483494/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37693224
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/dad2.12473
_version_ 1785102398007541760
author Rentz, Dorene M.
Klinger, Hannah M.
Samaroo, Aubryn
Fitzpatrick, Colleen
Schneider, Olivia R.
Amagai, Saki
Peipert, John Devin
author_facet Rentz, Dorene M.
Klinger, Hannah M.
Samaroo, Aubryn
Fitzpatrick, Colleen
Schneider, Olivia R.
Amagai, Saki
Peipert, John Devin
author_sort Rentz, Dorene M.
collection PubMed
description The Face Name Associative Memory Exam (FNAME) was introduced into the NIH Toolbox as part of the ARMADA study and establishes normative data for diverse participants, ages 64 to 85+, and proposes cutoff scores between biomarker positive versus negative (+/−) groups. The FNAME was administered to 257 participants across the clinical spectrum with 122 having amyloid biomarkers. Linear regression explored the association between demographics and FNAME and between amyloid (+/−) groups. Receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) identified performance thresholds that best discriminated between biomarker (+/−) individuals. Lower FNAME scores occurred in males, older ages, Black/African Americans, Hispanics, and biomarker‐positive participants. ROC analyses demonstrated acceptable accuracy (0.73 to 0.77) but only when combined with clinical status. The diagnostic discrimination of amyloid positivity was acceptable but not excellent, suggesting the FNAME may be a better screening indicator of clinical status rather than amyloid deposition in cognitively normal individuals. Normative data are provided.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10483494
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104834942023-09-08 Face Name Associative Memory Exam and biomarker status in the ARMADA study: Advancing reliable measurement in Alzheimer's disease and cognitive aging Rentz, Dorene M. Klinger, Hannah M. Samaroo, Aubryn Fitzpatrick, Colleen Schneider, Olivia R. Amagai, Saki Peipert, John Devin Alzheimers Dement (Amst) Research Articles The Face Name Associative Memory Exam (FNAME) was introduced into the NIH Toolbox as part of the ARMADA study and establishes normative data for diverse participants, ages 64 to 85+, and proposes cutoff scores between biomarker positive versus negative (+/−) groups. The FNAME was administered to 257 participants across the clinical spectrum with 122 having amyloid biomarkers. Linear regression explored the association between demographics and FNAME and between amyloid (+/−) groups. Receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) identified performance thresholds that best discriminated between biomarker (+/−) individuals. Lower FNAME scores occurred in males, older ages, Black/African Americans, Hispanics, and biomarker‐positive participants. ROC analyses demonstrated acceptable accuracy (0.73 to 0.77) but only when combined with clinical status. The diagnostic discrimination of amyloid positivity was acceptable but not excellent, suggesting the FNAME may be a better screening indicator of clinical status rather than amyloid deposition in cognitively normal individuals. Normative data are provided. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10483494/ /pubmed/37693224 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/dad2.12473 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of Alzheimer's Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Rentz, Dorene M.
Klinger, Hannah M.
Samaroo, Aubryn
Fitzpatrick, Colleen
Schneider, Olivia R.
Amagai, Saki
Peipert, John Devin
Face Name Associative Memory Exam and biomarker status in the ARMADA study: Advancing reliable measurement in Alzheimer's disease and cognitive aging
title Face Name Associative Memory Exam and biomarker status in the ARMADA study: Advancing reliable measurement in Alzheimer's disease and cognitive aging
title_full Face Name Associative Memory Exam and biomarker status in the ARMADA study: Advancing reliable measurement in Alzheimer's disease and cognitive aging
title_fullStr Face Name Associative Memory Exam and biomarker status in the ARMADA study: Advancing reliable measurement in Alzheimer's disease and cognitive aging
title_full_unstemmed Face Name Associative Memory Exam and biomarker status in the ARMADA study: Advancing reliable measurement in Alzheimer's disease and cognitive aging
title_short Face Name Associative Memory Exam and biomarker status in the ARMADA study: Advancing reliable measurement in Alzheimer's disease and cognitive aging
title_sort face name associative memory exam and biomarker status in the armada study: advancing reliable measurement in alzheimer's disease and cognitive aging
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10483494/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37693224
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/dad2.12473
work_keys_str_mv AT rentzdorenem facenameassociativememoryexamandbiomarkerstatusinthearmadastudyadvancingreliablemeasurementinalzheimersdiseaseandcognitiveaging
AT klingerhannahm facenameassociativememoryexamandbiomarkerstatusinthearmadastudyadvancingreliablemeasurementinalzheimersdiseaseandcognitiveaging
AT samarooaubryn facenameassociativememoryexamandbiomarkerstatusinthearmadastudyadvancingreliablemeasurementinalzheimersdiseaseandcognitiveaging
AT fitzpatrickcolleen facenameassociativememoryexamandbiomarkerstatusinthearmadastudyadvancingreliablemeasurementinalzheimersdiseaseandcognitiveaging
AT schneideroliviar facenameassociativememoryexamandbiomarkerstatusinthearmadastudyadvancingreliablemeasurementinalzheimersdiseaseandcognitiveaging
AT amagaisaki facenameassociativememoryexamandbiomarkerstatusinthearmadastudyadvancingreliablemeasurementinalzheimersdiseaseandcognitiveaging
AT peipertjohndevin facenameassociativememoryexamandbiomarkerstatusinthearmadastudyadvancingreliablemeasurementinalzheimersdiseaseandcognitiveaging