Cargando…
Analysis of Retracted Manuscripts in Chemistry: Errors vs Misconduct
[Image: see text] In this Viewpoint we discuss Chemistry manuscripts retracted during the 2001–2021 period (a total of 1292 journal articles retrieved from the Retraction Watch database). We showed that 58.5% of Chemistry manuscripts were retracted due to misconduct; of them, 40.5% of retractions we...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Chemical Society
2023
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10483516/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37692206 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c03689 |
Sumario: | [Image: see text] In this Viewpoint we discuss Chemistry manuscripts retracted during the 2001–2021 period (a total of 1292 journal articles retrieved from the Retraction Watch database). We showed that 58.5% of Chemistry manuscripts were retracted due to misconduct; of them, 40.5% of retractions were due to self-plagiarism and 36% due to fraud. Errors and concerns unrelated to misconduct constituted 26% of all retractions. Retracted manuscripts had a median retraction time of 1.7 years and peer-review time of 71 days (but only 43 days for fraudulent manuscripts). |
---|