Analysis of Retracted Manuscripts in Chemistry: Errors vs Misconduct

[Image: see text] In this Viewpoint we discuss Chemistry manuscripts retracted during the 2001–2021 period (a total of 1292 journal articles retrieved from the Retraction Watch database). We showed that 58.5% of Chemistry manuscripts were retracted due to misconduct; of them, 40.5% of retractions we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sevryugina, Yulia, Jimenez, Ryan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2023
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10483516/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37692206
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c03689
_version_ 1785102403223158784
author Sevryugina, Yulia
Jimenez, Ryan
author_facet Sevryugina, Yulia
Jimenez, Ryan
author_sort Sevryugina, Yulia
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] In this Viewpoint we discuss Chemistry manuscripts retracted during the 2001–2021 period (a total of 1292 journal articles retrieved from the Retraction Watch database). We showed that 58.5% of Chemistry manuscripts were retracted due to misconduct; of them, 40.5% of retractions were due to self-plagiarism and 36% due to fraud. Errors and concerns unrelated to misconduct constituted 26% of all retractions. Retracted manuscripts had a median retraction time of 1.7 years and peer-review time of 71 days (but only 43 days for fraudulent manuscripts).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10483516
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104835162023-09-08 Analysis of Retracted Manuscripts in Chemistry: Errors vs Misconduct Sevryugina, Yulia Jimenez, Ryan ACS Omega [Image: see text] In this Viewpoint we discuss Chemistry manuscripts retracted during the 2001–2021 period (a total of 1292 journal articles retrieved from the Retraction Watch database). We showed that 58.5% of Chemistry manuscripts were retracted due to misconduct; of them, 40.5% of retractions were due to self-plagiarism and 36% due to fraud. Errors and concerns unrelated to misconduct constituted 26% of all retractions. Retracted manuscripts had a median retraction time of 1.7 years and peer-review time of 71 days (but only 43 days for fraudulent manuscripts). American Chemical Society 2023-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10483516/ /pubmed/37692206 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c03689 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Permits non-commercial access and re-use, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained; but does not permit creation of adaptations or other derivative works (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Sevryugina, Yulia
Jimenez, Ryan
Analysis of Retracted Manuscripts in Chemistry: Errors vs Misconduct
title Analysis of Retracted Manuscripts in Chemistry: Errors vs Misconduct
title_full Analysis of Retracted Manuscripts in Chemistry: Errors vs Misconduct
title_fullStr Analysis of Retracted Manuscripts in Chemistry: Errors vs Misconduct
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of Retracted Manuscripts in Chemistry: Errors vs Misconduct
title_short Analysis of Retracted Manuscripts in Chemistry: Errors vs Misconduct
title_sort analysis of retracted manuscripts in chemistry: errors vs misconduct
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10483516/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37692206
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c03689
work_keys_str_mv AT sevryuginayulia analysisofretractedmanuscriptsinchemistryerrorsvsmisconduct
AT jimenezryan analysisofretractedmanuscriptsinchemistryerrorsvsmisconduct

Ejemplares similares