Cargando…

Analysis of the accuracy and reliability of vertical jump evaluation using a low-cost acquisition system

BACKGROUND: The vertical jump can be analyzed based on the flight time achieved by the individual. This measurement can be obtained using a force platform or a three-dimensional infrared camera system, but such equipment is expensive and requires training for data collection and processing. Thus, th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Caseiro-Filho, Luis C., Girasol, Carlos E., Rinaldi, Mateus L., Lemos, Tenysson W., Guirro, Rinaldo R. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10483722/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37674232
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-023-00718-z
_version_ 1785102442824728576
author Caseiro-Filho, Luis C.
Girasol, Carlos E.
Rinaldi, Mateus L.
Lemos, Tenysson W.
Guirro, Rinaldo R. J.
author_facet Caseiro-Filho, Luis C.
Girasol, Carlos E.
Rinaldi, Mateus L.
Lemos, Tenysson W.
Guirro, Rinaldo R. J.
author_sort Caseiro-Filho, Luis C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The vertical jump can be analyzed based on the flight time achieved by the individual. This measurement can be obtained using a force platform or a three-dimensional infrared camera system, but such equipment is expensive and requires training for data collection and processing. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of using a smartphone and the Kinovea software compared with a force platform as a method of vertical jump analysis. METHODS: For this purpose, two independent evaluators analyzed videos of bipodal and unipodal vertical jumps by counting the variables among participants. The participants performed three consecutive jumps in bipodal and unipodal conditions with the dominant and non-dominant legs. RESULTS: The intra-rater analysis for bipodal jumps was found to have excellent reproducibility (ICC = 0.903 to 0.934), whereas for unipodal jumps, the reproducibility was moderate to excellent (ICC = 0.713 to 0.902). The inter-rater analysis showed that for bipodal jumps, the reproducibility is substantial to excellent (ICC = 0.823 to 0.926), while for unipodal jumps, it is moderate (ICC = 0.554 to 0.702). CONCLUSIONS: Therefore, it can be concluded that the vertical jump evaluation can be performed using the smartphone-Kinovea system. However, the same evaluator should carry out the evaluation to maintain reliable indices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10483722
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104837222023-09-08 Analysis of the accuracy and reliability of vertical jump evaluation using a low-cost acquisition system Caseiro-Filho, Luis C. Girasol, Carlos E. Rinaldi, Mateus L. Lemos, Tenysson W. Guirro, Rinaldo R. J. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil Research BACKGROUND: The vertical jump can be analyzed based on the flight time achieved by the individual. This measurement can be obtained using a force platform or a three-dimensional infrared camera system, but such equipment is expensive and requires training for data collection and processing. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of using a smartphone and the Kinovea software compared with a force platform as a method of vertical jump analysis. METHODS: For this purpose, two independent evaluators analyzed videos of bipodal and unipodal vertical jumps by counting the variables among participants. The participants performed three consecutive jumps in bipodal and unipodal conditions with the dominant and non-dominant legs. RESULTS: The intra-rater analysis for bipodal jumps was found to have excellent reproducibility (ICC = 0.903 to 0.934), whereas for unipodal jumps, the reproducibility was moderate to excellent (ICC = 0.713 to 0.902). The inter-rater analysis showed that for bipodal jumps, the reproducibility is substantial to excellent (ICC = 0.823 to 0.926), while for unipodal jumps, it is moderate (ICC = 0.554 to 0.702). CONCLUSIONS: Therefore, it can be concluded that the vertical jump evaluation can be performed using the smartphone-Kinovea system. However, the same evaluator should carry out the evaluation to maintain reliable indices. BioMed Central 2023-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10483722/ /pubmed/37674232 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-023-00718-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Caseiro-Filho, Luis C.
Girasol, Carlos E.
Rinaldi, Mateus L.
Lemos, Tenysson W.
Guirro, Rinaldo R. J.
Analysis of the accuracy and reliability of vertical jump evaluation using a low-cost acquisition system
title Analysis of the accuracy and reliability of vertical jump evaluation using a low-cost acquisition system
title_full Analysis of the accuracy and reliability of vertical jump evaluation using a low-cost acquisition system
title_fullStr Analysis of the accuracy and reliability of vertical jump evaluation using a low-cost acquisition system
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of the accuracy and reliability of vertical jump evaluation using a low-cost acquisition system
title_short Analysis of the accuracy and reliability of vertical jump evaluation using a low-cost acquisition system
title_sort analysis of the accuracy and reliability of vertical jump evaluation using a low-cost acquisition system
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10483722/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37674232
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-023-00718-z
work_keys_str_mv AT caseirofilholuisc analysisoftheaccuracyandreliabilityofverticaljumpevaluationusingalowcostacquisitionsystem
AT girasolcarlose analysisoftheaccuracyandreliabilityofverticaljumpevaluationusingalowcostacquisitionsystem
AT rinaldimateusl analysisoftheaccuracyandreliabilityofverticaljumpevaluationusingalowcostacquisitionsystem
AT lemostenyssonw analysisoftheaccuracyandreliabilityofverticaljumpevaluationusingalowcostacquisitionsystem
AT guirrorinaldorj analysisoftheaccuracyandreliabilityofverticaljumpevaluationusingalowcostacquisitionsystem