Cargando…

Direct versus indirect epiglottis elevation in cervical spine movement during videolaryngoscopic intubation under manual in-line stabilization: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: During videolaryngoscopic intubation, direct epiglottis elevation provides a higher percentage of glottic opening score than indirect epiglottis elevation. In this randomized controlled trial, we compared cervical spine movement during videolaryngoscopic intubation under manual in-line s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Choi, Seungeun, Lee, Dong Ju, Shin, Kyung Won, Kim, Yoon Jung, Park, Hee-Pyoung, Oh, Hyongmin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10483787/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37679737
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-023-02259-x
_version_ 1785102458381402112
author Choi, Seungeun
Lee, Dong Ju
Shin, Kyung Won
Kim, Yoon Jung
Park, Hee-Pyoung
Oh, Hyongmin
author_facet Choi, Seungeun
Lee, Dong Ju
Shin, Kyung Won
Kim, Yoon Jung
Park, Hee-Pyoung
Oh, Hyongmin
author_sort Choi, Seungeun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: During videolaryngoscopic intubation, direct epiglottis elevation provides a higher percentage of glottic opening score than indirect epiglottis elevation. In this randomized controlled trial, we compared cervical spine movement during videolaryngoscopic intubation under manual in-line stabilization between the two glottis exposure methods. METHODS: Videolaryngoscopic intubation under manual in-line stabilization was performed using C-MAC® D-blade: direct (n = 51) and indirect (n = 51) epiglottis elevation groups. The percentage of glottic opening score was set equally at 50% during videolaryngoscopic intubation in both groups. The primary outcome measure was cervical spine movement during videolaryngoscopic intubation at the occiput–C1, C1–C2, and C2–C5. The secondary outcome measures included intubation performance (intubation success rate and intubation time). RESULTS: Cervical spine movement during videolaryngoscopic intubation was significantly smaller at the occiput–C1 in the direct epiglottis elevation group than in the indirect epiglottis elevation group (mean [standard deviation] 3.9 [4.0] vs. 5.8 [3.4] °, P = 0.011), whereas it was not significantly different at the C1–C2 and C2–C5 between the two groups. All intubations were successful on the first attempt, achieving a percentage of glottic opening score of 50% in both groups. Intubation time was longer in the direct epiglottis elevation group (median [interquartile range] 29.0 [24.0–35.0] vs. 22.0 [18.0–27.0] s, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: When performing videolaryngoscopic intubation under manual in-line stabilization, direct epiglottis elevation can be more beneficial than indirect epiglottis elevation in reducing cervical spine movement during videolaryngoscopic intubation at the occiput–C1. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Research Information Service (number: KCT0006239, date: 10/06/2021).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10483787
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104837872023-09-08 Direct versus indirect epiglottis elevation in cervical spine movement during videolaryngoscopic intubation under manual in-line stabilization: a randomized controlled trial Choi, Seungeun Lee, Dong Ju Shin, Kyung Won Kim, Yoon Jung Park, Hee-Pyoung Oh, Hyongmin BMC Anesthesiol Research BACKGROUND: During videolaryngoscopic intubation, direct epiglottis elevation provides a higher percentage of glottic opening score than indirect epiglottis elevation. In this randomized controlled trial, we compared cervical spine movement during videolaryngoscopic intubation under manual in-line stabilization between the two glottis exposure methods. METHODS: Videolaryngoscopic intubation under manual in-line stabilization was performed using C-MAC® D-blade: direct (n = 51) and indirect (n = 51) epiglottis elevation groups. The percentage of glottic opening score was set equally at 50% during videolaryngoscopic intubation in both groups. The primary outcome measure was cervical spine movement during videolaryngoscopic intubation at the occiput–C1, C1–C2, and C2–C5. The secondary outcome measures included intubation performance (intubation success rate and intubation time). RESULTS: Cervical spine movement during videolaryngoscopic intubation was significantly smaller at the occiput–C1 in the direct epiglottis elevation group than in the indirect epiglottis elevation group (mean [standard deviation] 3.9 [4.0] vs. 5.8 [3.4] °, P = 0.011), whereas it was not significantly different at the C1–C2 and C2–C5 between the two groups. All intubations were successful on the first attempt, achieving a percentage of glottic opening score of 50% in both groups. Intubation time was longer in the direct epiglottis elevation group (median [interquartile range] 29.0 [24.0–35.0] vs. 22.0 [18.0–27.0] s, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: When performing videolaryngoscopic intubation under manual in-line stabilization, direct epiglottis elevation can be more beneficial than indirect epiglottis elevation in reducing cervical spine movement during videolaryngoscopic intubation at the occiput–C1. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Research Information Service (number: KCT0006239, date: 10/06/2021). BioMed Central 2023-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10483787/ /pubmed/37679737 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-023-02259-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Choi, Seungeun
Lee, Dong Ju
Shin, Kyung Won
Kim, Yoon Jung
Park, Hee-Pyoung
Oh, Hyongmin
Direct versus indirect epiglottis elevation in cervical spine movement during videolaryngoscopic intubation under manual in-line stabilization: a randomized controlled trial
title Direct versus indirect epiglottis elevation in cervical spine movement during videolaryngoscopic intubation under manual in-line stabilization: a randomized controlled trial
title_full Direct versus indirect epiglottis elevation in cervical spine movement during videolaryngoscopic intubation under manual in-line stabilization: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Direct versus indirect epiglottis elevation in cervical spine movement during videolaryngoscopic intubation under manual in-line stabilization: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Direct versus indirect epiglottis elevation in cervical spine movement during videolaryngoscopic intubation under manual in-line stabilization: a randomized controlled trial
title_short Direct versus indirect epiglottis elevation in cervical spine movement during videolaryngoscopic intubation under manual in-line stabilization: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort direct versus indirect epiglottis elevation in cervical spine movement during videolaryngoscopic intubation under manual in-line stabilization: a randomized controlled trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10483787/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37679737
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-023-02259-x
work_keys_str_mv AT choiseungeun directversusindirectepiglottiselevationincervicalspinemovementduringvideolaryngoscopicintubationundermanualinlinestabilizationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT leedongju directversusindirectepiglottiselevationincervicalspinemovementduringvideolaryngoscopicintubationundermanualinlinestabilizationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT shinkyungwon directversusindirectepiglottiselevationincervicalspinemovementduringvideolaryngoscopicintubationundermanualinlinestabilizationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kimyoonjung directversusindirectepiglottiselevationincervicalspinemovementduringvideolaryngoscopicintubationundermanualinlinestabilizationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT parkheepyoung directversusindirectepiglottiselevationincervicalspinemovementduringvideolaryngoscopicintubationundermanualinlinestabilizationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ohhyongmin directversusindirectepiglottiselevationincervicalspinemovementduringvideolaryngoscopicintubationundermanualinlinestabilizationarandomizedcontrolledtrial