Cargando…

A favorable suture method for size-mismatched nerve transfer: comparison with standard perineural suture in an experimental rat study

BACKGROUND: In nerve transfer for peripheral nerve injury, it is sometimes necessary to suture size-mismatched nerves. In 1993, a favorable suture method called the Ochiai suture method for size-mismatched nerve transfer was reported. However, there is currently a lack of substantial evidence beyond...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Iwabuchi, Sho, Hara, Yuki, Yoshii, Yuichi, Ikumi, Akira, Mishima, Hajime, Yamazaki, Masashi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10483853/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37674224
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04123-7
_version_ 1785102474639572992
author Iwabuchi, Sho
Hara, Yuki
Yoshii, Yuichi
Ikumi, Akira
Mishima, Hajime
Yamazaki, Masashi
author_facet Iwabuchi, Sho
Hara, Yuki
Yoshii, Yuichi
Ikumi, Akira
Mishima, Hajime
Yamazaki, Masashi
author_sort Iwabuchi, Sho
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In nerve transfer for peripheral nerve injury, it is sometimes necessary to suture size-mismatched nerves. In 1993, a favorable suture method called the Ochiai suture method for size-mismatched nerve transfer was reported. However, there is currently a lack of substantial evidence beyond the original report. Therefore, this study aimed to verify the advantages of using the Ochiai suture method for size-mismatched nerve transfer. METHODS: A total of 18 rats were evaluated in this study and randomly divided into two groups. All rats underwent femoral to sciatic nerve transfer. Specifically, group A (n = 10) underwent the Ochiai suture method, while group B (n = 8) underwent the perineural suture method. After 12 weeks postoperatively, we conducted the sciatic functional index (SFI) test, measured muscle wet-weight, and performed histological evaluations. All data were compared between the two groups, with Welch’s t test for normally distributed data and Mann-Whitney's U test for non-normally distributed data. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: The mean number of axons was significantly greater in group A than in group B at 5 mm distal to the stump (p = 0.04). Additionally, the average axonal diameter was significantly greater in group A than in group B at 5 mm and 10 mm distal to the stump (p < 0.01 and p < 0.01, respectively). However, the SFI test and measured muscle wet-weight values showed no significant differences between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our study revealed that the Ochiai suture method for size-mismatched nerve transfer in rats increases the regenerative axon numbers and diameters. These findings suggest that the Ochiai suture method could be a valuable approach for achieving effective motor function restoration in cases of size-mismatched nerve transfer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10483853
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104838532023-09-08 A favorable suture method for size-mismatched nerve transfer: comparison with standard perineural suture in an experimental rat study Iwabuchi, Sho Hara, Yuki Yoshii, Yuichi Ikumi, Akira Mishima, Hajime Yamazaki, Masashi J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: In nerve transfer for peripheral nerve injury, it is sometimes necessary to suture size-mismatched nerves. In 1993, a favorable suture method called the Ochiai suture method for size-mismatched nerve transfer was reported. However, there is currently a lack of substantial evidence beyond the original report. Therefore, this study aimed to verify the advantages of using the Ochiai suture method for size-mismatched nerve transfer. METHODS: A total of 18 rats were evaluated in this study and randomly divided into two groups. All rats underwent femoral to sciatic nerve transfer. Specifically, group A (n = 10) underwent the Ochiai suture method, while group B (n = 8) underwent the perineural suture method. After 12 weeks postoperatively, we conducted the sciatic functional index (SFI) test, measured muscle wet-weight, and performed histological evaluations. All data were compared between the two groups, with Welch’s t test for normally distributed data and Mann-Whitney's U test for non-normally distributed data. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: The mean number of axons was significantly greater in group A than in group B at 5 mm distal to the stump (p = 0.04). Additionally, the average axonal diameter was significantly greater in group A than in group B at 5 mm and 10 mm distal to the stump (p < 0.01 and p < 0.01, respectively). However, the SFI test and measured muscle wet-weight values showed no significant differences between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our study revealed that the Ochiai suture method for size-mismatched nerve transfer in rats increases the regenerative axon numbers and diameters. These findings suggest that the Ochiai suture method could be a valuable approach for achieving effective motor function restoration in cases of size-mismatched nerve transfer. BioMed Central 2023-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10483853/ /pubmed/37674224 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04123-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Iwabuchi, Sho
Hara, Yuki
Yoshii, Yuichi
Ikumi, Akira
Mishima, Hajime
Yamazaki, Masashi
A favorable suture method for size-mismatched nerve transfer: comparison with standard perineural suture in an experimental rat study
title A favorable suture method for size-mismatched nerve transfer: comparison with standard perineural suture in an experimental rat study
title_full A favorable suture method for size-mismatched nerve transfer: comparison with standard perineural suture in an experimental rat study
title_fullStr A favorable suture method for size-mismatched nerve transfer: comparison with standard perineural suture in an experimental rat study
title_full_unstemmed A favorable suture method for size-mismatched nerve transfer: comparison with standard perineural suture in an experimental rat study
title_short A favorable suture method for size-mismatched nerve transfer: comparison with standard perineural suture in an experimental rat study
title_sort favorable suture method for size-mismatched nerve transfer: comparison with standard perineural suture in an experimental rat study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10483853/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37674224
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04123-7
work_keys_str_mv AT iwabuchisho afavorablesuturemethodforsizemismatchednervetransfercomparisonwithstandardperineuralsutureinanexperimentalratstudy
AT harayuki afavorablesuturemethodforsizemismatchednervetransfercomparisonwithstandardperineuralsutureinanexperimentalratstudy
AT yoshiiyuichi afavorablesuturemethodforsizemismatchednervetransfercomparisonwithstandardperineuralsutureinanexperimentalratstudy
AT ikumiakira afavorablesuturemethodforsizemismatchednervetransfercomparisonwithstandardperineuralsutureinanexperimentalratstudy
AT mishimahajime afavorablesuturemethodforsizemismatchednervetransfercomparisonwithstandardperineuralsutureinanexperimentalratstudy
AT yamazakimasashi afavorablesuturemethodforsizemismatchednervetransfercomparisonwithstandardperineuralsutureinanexperimentalratstudy
AT iwabuchisho favorablesuturemethodforsizemismatchednervetransfercomparisonwithstandardperineuralsutureinanexperimentalratstudy
AT harayuki favorablesuturemethodforsizemismatchednervetransfercomparisonwithstandardperineuralsutureinanexperimentalratstudy
AT yoshiiyuichi favorablesuturemethodforsizemismatchednervetransfercomparisonwithstandardperineuralsutureinanexperimentalratstudy
AT ikumiakira favorablesuturemethodforsizemismatchednervetransfercomparisonwithstandardperineuralsutureinanexperimentalratstudy
AT mishimahajime favorablesuturemethodforsizemismatchednervetransfercomparisonwithstandardperineuralsutureinanexperimentalratstudy
AT yamazakimasashi favorablesuturemethodforsizemismatchednervetransfercomparisonwithstandardperineuralsutureinanexperimentalratstudy