Cargando…

Multiple micronutrient supplementation cost–benefit tool for informing maternal nutrition policy and investment decisions

Antenatal multiple micronutrient supplementation (MMS) is an intervention that can help reach three of the six global nutrition targets, either directly or indirectly: a reduction in low birth weight, stunting, and anaemia in women of reproductive age. To support global guideline development and nat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Verney, Allison M. J., Busch‐Hallen, Jennifer F., Walters, Dylan D., Rowe, Sarah N., Kurzawa, Zuzanna A., Arabi, Mandana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10483938/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37378454
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mcn.13523
_version_ 1785102492968681472
author Verney, Allison M. J.
Busch‐Hallen, Jennifer F.
Walters, Dylan D.
Rowe, Sarah N.
Kurzawa, Zuzanna A.
Arabi, Mandana
author_facet Verney, Allison M. J.
Busch‐Hallen, Jennifer F.
Walters, Dylan D.
Rowe, Sarah N.
Kurzawa, Zuzanna A.
Arabi, Mandana
author_sort Verney, Allison M. J.
collection PubMed
description Antenatal multiple micronutrient supplementation (MMS) is an intervention that can help reach three of the six global nutrition targets, either directly or indirectly: a reduction in low birth weight, stunting, and anaemia in women of reproductive age. To support global guideline development and national decision‐making on investments into maternal nutrition, Nutrition International developed a modelling tool called the MMS cost–benefit tool to help users understand whether antenatal MMS is better value for money than iron and folic acid supplementation (IFAS) during pregnancy. The MMS cost–benefit tool can generate estimates on the potential health impact, budget impact, economic value, cost‐effectiveness and benefit–cost ratio of investing in MMS compared to IFAS in LMICs. In the 33 countries with data included in the tool, the MMS cost–benefit tool shows that transitioning is expected to generate substantial health benefits in terms of morbidity and mortality averted and can be very cost‐effective in multiple scenarios for these countries. The cost per DALY averted averages at US$ 23.61 and benefit–cost ratio ranges from US$ 41–US$ 1304: $1.0, which suggest MMS is good value for money compared with IFAS. With its user‐friendly design, open access availability, and online data‐driven analytics, the MMS cost–benefit tool can be a powerful resource for governments and nutrition partners seeking timely and evidence‐based analyses to inform policy‐decision and investments towards the scale‐up of MMS for pregnant women globally.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10483938
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104839382023-09-08 Multiple micronutrient supplementation cost–benefit tool for informing maternal nutrition policy and investment decisions Verney, Allison M. J. Busch‐Hallen, Jennifer F. Walters, Dylan D. Rowe, Sarah N. Kurzawa, Zuzanna A. Arabi, Mandana Matern Child Nutr Original Articles Antenatal multiple micronutrient supplementation (MMS) is an intervention that can help reach three of the six global nutrition targets, either directly or indirectly: a reduction in low birth weight, stunting, and anaemia in women of reproductive age. To support global guideline development and national decision‐making on investments into maternal nutrition, Nutrition International developed a modelling tool called the MMS cost–benefit tool to help users understand whether antenatal MMS is better value for money than iron and folic acid supplementation (IFAS) during pregnancy. The MMS cost–benefit tool can generate estimates on the potential health impact, budget impact, economic value, cost‐effectiveness and benefit–cost ratio of investing in MMS compared to IFAS in LMICs. In the 33 countries with data included in the tool, the MMS cost–benefit tool shows that transitioning is expected to generate substantial health benefits in terms of morbidity and mortality averted and can be very cost‐effective in multiple scenarios for these countries. The cost per DALY averted averages at US$ 23.61 and benefit–cost ratio ranges from US$ 41–US$ 1304: $1.0, which suggest MMS is good value for money compared with IFAS. With its user‐friendly design, open access availability, and online data‐driven analytics, the MMS cost–benefit tool can be a powerful resource for governments and nutrition partners seeking timely and evidence‐based analyses to inform policy‐decision and investments towards the scale‐up of MMS for pregnant women globally. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10483938/ /pubmed/37378454 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mcn.13523 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Maternal & Child Nutrition published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Verney, Allison M. J.
Busch‐Hallen, Jennifer F.
Walters, Dylan D.
Rowe, Sarah N.
Kurzawa, Zuzanna A.
Arabi, Mandana
Multiple micronutrient supplementation cost–benefit tool for informing maternal nutrition policy and investment decisions
title Multiple micronutrient supplementation cost–benefit tool for informing maternal nutrition policy and investment decisions
title_full Multiple micronutrient supplementation cost–benefit tool for informing maternal nutrition policy and investment decisions
title_fullStr Multiple micronutrient supplementation cost–benefit tool for informing maternal nutrition policy and investment decisions
title_full_unstemmed Multiple micronutrient supplementation cost–benefit tool for informing maternal nutrition policy and investment decisions
title_short Multiple micronutrient supplementation cost–benefit tool for informing maternal nutrition policy and investment decisions
title_sort multiple micronutrient supplementation cost–benefit tool for informing maternal nutrition policy and investment decisions
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10483938/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37378454
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mcn.13523
work_keys_str_mv AT verneyallisonmj multiplemicronutrientsupplementationcostbenefittoolforinformingmaternalnutritionpolicyandinvestmentdecisions
AT buschhallenjenniferf multiplemicronutrientsupplementationcostbenefittoolforinformingmaternalnutritionpolicyandinvestmentdecisions
AT waltersdyland multiplemicronutrientsupplementationcostbenefittoolforinformingmaternalnutritionpolicyandinvestmentdecisions
AT rowesarahn multiplemicronutrientsupplementationcostbenefittoolforinformingmaternalnutritionpolicyandinvestmentdecisions
AT kurzawazuzannaa multiplemicronutrientsupplementationcostbenefittoolforinformingmaternalnutritionpolicyandinvestmentdecisions
AT arabimandana multiplemicronutrientsupplementationcostbenefittoolforinformingmaternalnutritionpolicyandinvestmentdecisions