Cargando…
Implementing AI in healthcare—the relevance of trust: a scoping review
BACKGROUND: The process of translation of AI and its potential benefits into practice in healthcare services has been slow in spite of its rapid development. Trust in AI in relation to implementation processes is an important aspect. Without a clear understanding, the development of effective implem...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10484529/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37693234 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2023.1211150 |
_version_ | 1785102598289752064 |
---|---|
author | Steerling, Emilie Siira, Elin Nilsen, Per Svedberg, Petra Nygren, Jens |
author_facet | Steerling, Emilie Siira, Elin Nilsen, Per Svedberg, Petra Nygren, Jens |
author_sort | Steerling, Emilie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The process of translation of AI and its potential benefits into practice in healthcare services has been slow in spite of its rapid development. Trust in AI in relation to implementation processes is an important aspect. Without a clear understanding, the development of effective implementation strategies will not be possible, nor will AI advance despite the significant investments and possibilities. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore the scientific literature regarding how trust in AI in relation to implementation in healthcare is conceptualized and what influences trust in AI in relation to implementation in healthcare. METHODS: This scoping review included five scientific databases. These were searched to identify publications related to the study aims. Articles were included if they were published in English, after 2012, and peer-reviewed. Two independent reviewers conducted an abstract and full-text review, as well as carrying out a thematic analysis with an inductive approach to address the study aims. The review was reported in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. RESULTS: A total of eight studies were included in the final review. We found that trust was conceptualized in different ways. Most empirical studies had an individual perspective where trust was directed toward the technology's capability. Two studies focused on trust as relational between people in the context of the AI application rather than as having trust in the technology itself. Trust was also understood by its determinants and as having a mediating role, positioned between characteristics and AI use. The thematic analysis yielded three themes: individual characteristics, AI characteristics and contextual characteristics, which influence trust in AI in relation to implementation in healthcare. CONCLUSIONS: Findings showed that the conceptualization of trust in AI differed between the studies, as well as which determinants they accounted for as influencing trust. Few studies looked beyond individual characteristics and AI characteristics. Future empirical research addressing trust in AI in relation to implementation in healthcare should have a more holistic view of the concept to be able to manage the many challenges, uncertainties, and perceived risks. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10484529 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104845292023-09-08 Implementing AI in healthcare—the relevance of trust: a scoping review Steerling, Emilie Siira, Elin Nilsen, Per Svedberg, Petra Nygren, Jens Front Health Serv Health Services BACKGROUND: The process of translation of AI and its potential benefits into practice in healthcare services has been slow in spite of its rapid development. Trust in AI in relation to implementation processes is an important aspect. Without a clear understanding, the development of effective implementation strategies will not be possible, nor will AI advance despite the significant investments and possibilities. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore the scientific literature regarding how trust in AI in relation to implementation in healthcare is conceptualized and what influences trust in AI in relation to implementation in healthcare. METHODS: This scoping review included five scientific databases. These were searched to identify publications related to the study aims. Articles were included if they were published in English, after 2012, and peer-reviewed. Two independent reviewers conducted an abstract and full-text review, as well as carrying out a thematic analysis with an inductive approach to address the study aims. The review was reported in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. RESULTS: A total of eight studies were included in the final review. We found that trust was conceptualized in different ways. Most empirical studies had an individual perspective where trust was directed toward the technology's capability. Two studies focused on trust as relational between people in the context of the AI application rather than as having trust in the technology itself. Trust was also understood by its determinants and as having a mediating role, positioned between characteristics and AI use. The thematic analysis yielded three themes: individual characteristics, AI characteristics and contextual characteristics, which influence trust in AI in relation to implementation in healthcare. CONCLUSIONS: Findings showed that the conceptualization of trust in AI differed between the studies, as well as which determinants they accounted for as influencing trust. Few studies looked beyond individual characteristics and AI characteristics. Future empirical research addressing trust in AI in relation to implementation in healthcare should have a more holistic view of the concept to be able to manage the many challenges, uncertainties, and perceived risks. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10484529/ /pubmed/37693234 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2023.1211150 Text en © 2023 Steerling, Siira, Nilsen, Svedberg and Nygren. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Health Services Steerling, Emilie Siira, Elin Nilsen, Per Svedberg, Petra Nygren, Jens Implementing AI in healthcare—the relevance of trust: a scoping review |
title | Implementing AI in healthcare—the relevance of trust: a scoping review |
title_full | Implementing AI in healthcare—the relevance of trust: a scoping review |
title_fullStr | Implementing AI in healthcare—the relevance of trust: a scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | Implementing AI in healthcare—the relevance of trust: a scoping review |
title_short | Implementing AI in healthcare—the relevance of trust: a scoping review |
title_sort | implementing ai in healthcare—the relevance of trust: a scoping review |
topic | Health Services |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10484529/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37693234 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2023.1211150 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT steerlingemilie implementingaiinhealthcaretherelevanceoftrustascopingreview AT siiraelin implementingaiinhealthcaretherelevanceoftrustascopingreview AT nilsenper implementingaiinhealthcaretherelevanceoftrustascopingreview AT svedbergpetra implementingaiinhealthcaretherelevanceoftrustascopingreview AT nygrenjens implementingaiinhealthcaretherelevanceoftrustascopingreview |