Cargando…
Is acupuncture safe in the ICU? A systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The safety of interventions for critically ill patients is a crucial issue. In recent years, several studies have treated critically ill patients with acupuncture. However, the safety of acupuncture in this setting remains to be systematically measured. METHODS: In May 2022,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10484589/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37692789 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1190635 |
_version_ | 1785102612158218240 |
---|---|
author | Ben-Arie, Eyal Lottering, Bernice Jeanne Chen, Fang-Pey Ho, Wen-Chao Lee, Yu-Chen Inprasit, Chanya Kao, Pei-Yu |
author_facet | Ben-Arie, Eyal Lottering, Bernice Jeanne Chen, Fang-Pey Ho, Wen-Chao Lee, Yu-Chen Inprasit, Chanya Kao, Pei-Yu |
author_sort | Ben-Arie, Eyal |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The safety of interventions for critically ill patients is a crucial issue. In recent years, several studies have treated critically ill patients with acupuncture. However, the safety of acupuncture in this setting remains to be systematically measured. METHODS: In May 2022, the electronic databases of PubMed and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies comparing acupuncture interventions to control interventions in critically ill patients. Study outcomes examined the incidence of severe adverse events (AEs), minor AEs, adverse reactions, ICU stays, and 28-day mortality. RESULTS: A total of 31 articles were analyzed, and no serious AEs related to acupuncture treatment were identified. No significant differences were found between the groups in the meta-analysis of minor AEs (risk ratio [RR] 5.69 [0.34, 96.60], P = 0.23, I(2) = 76%). A reduced risk in the incidence of adverse reactions following acupuncture intervention was evidenced (RR 0.33 [0.22, 0.50], P = 0.00001, I(2) = 44%). The patients in the acupuncture arm spent significantly less time in the intensive care unit (ICU) (Mean difference −1.45 [−11.94, −10.97], P = 0.00001, I(2) = 56%) and also exhibited lower 28-day mortality rates (odds ratio 0.61 [0.48, 0.78], P = 0.0001, I(2) = 0%). CONCLUSION: There is no evidence to indicate a higher risk of severe or minor AEs in patients who receive acupuncture. Acupuncture demonstrated favorable results in both ICU stay and 28-day mortality measurements, in addition to presenting with fewer adverse reactions compared to routine ICU care. However, the low certainty of the evidence resulting from a high risk of bias in the included studies merits substantial consideration, and further research is still warranted. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=142131, identifier: CRD42020142131. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10484589 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104845892023-09-08 Is acupuncture safe in the ICU? A systematic review and meta-analysis Ben-Arie, Eyal Lottering, Bernice Jeanne Chen, Fang-Pey Ho, Wen-Chao Lee, Yu-Chen Inprasit, Chanya Kao, Pei-Yu Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The safety of interventions for critically ill patients is a crucial issue. In recent years, several studies have treated critically ill patients with acupuncture. However, the safety of acupuncture in this setting remains to be systematically measured. METHODS: In May 2022, the electronic databases of PubMed and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies comparing acupuncture interventions to control interventions in critically ill patients. Study outcomes examined the incidence of severe adverse events (AEs), minor AEs, adverse reactions, ICU stays, and 28-day mortality. RESULTS: A total of 31 articles were analyzed, and no serious AEs related to acupuncture treatment were identified. No significant differences were found between the groups in the meta-analysis of minor AEs (risk ratio [RR] 5.69 [0.34, 96.60], P = 0.23, I(2) = 76%). A reduced risk in the incidence of adverse reactions following acupuncture intervention was evidenced (RR 0.33 [0.22, 0.50], P = 0.00001, I(2) = 44%). The patients in the acupuncture arm spent significantly less time in the intensive care unit (ICU) (Mean difference −1.45 [−11.94, −10.97], P = 0.00001, I(2) = 56%) and also exhibited lower 28-day mortality rates (odds ratio 0.61 [0.48, 0.78], P = 0.0001, I(2) = 0%). CONCLUSION: There is no evidence to indicate a higher risk of severe or minor AEs in patients who receive acupuncture. Acupuncture demonstrated favorable results in both ICU stay and 28-day mortality measurements, in addition to presenting with fewer adverse reactions compared to routine ICU care. However, the low certainty of the evidence resulting from a high risk of bias in the included studies merits substantial consideration, and further research is still warranted. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=142131, identifier: CRD42020142131. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10484589/ /pubmed/37692789 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1190635 Text en Copyright © 2023 Ben-Arie, Lottering, Chen, Ho, Lee, Inprasit and Kao. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Medicine Ben-Arie, Eyal Lottering, Bernice Jeanne Chen, Fang-Pey Ho, Wen-Chao Lee, Yu-Chen Inprasit, Chanya Kao, Pei-Yu Is acupuncture safe in the ICU? A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Is acupuncture safe in the ICU? A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Is acupuncture safe in the ICU? A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Is acupuncture safe in the ICU? A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Is acupuncture safe in the ICU? A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Is acupuncture safe in the ICU? A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | is acupuncture safe in the icu? a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10484589/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37692789 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1190635 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT benarieeyal isacupuncturesafeintheicuasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lotteringbernicejeanne isacupuncturesafeintheicuasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chenfangpey isacupuncturesafeintheicuasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT howenchao isacupuncturesafeintheicuasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT leeyuchen isacupuncturesafeintheicuasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT inprasitchanya isacupuncturesafeintheicuasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kaopeiyu isacupuncturesafeintheicuasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |