Cargando…

Pelvic PET/MR attenuation correction in the image space using deep learning

INTRODUCTION: The five-class Dixon-based PET/MR attenuation correction (AC) model, which adds bone information to the four-class model by registering major bones from a bone atlas, has been shown to be error-prone. In this study, we introduce a novel method of accounting for bone in pelvic PET/MR AC...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abrahamsen, Bendik Skarre, Knudtsen, Ingerid Skjei, Eikenes, Live, Bathen, Tone Frost, Elschot, Mattijs
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10484800/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37692851
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1220009
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: The five-class Dixon-based PET/MR attenuation correction (AC) model, which adds bone information to the four-class model by registering major bones from a bone atlas, has been shown to be error-prone. In this study, we introduce a novel method of accounting for bone in pelvic PET/MR AC by directly predicting the errors in the PET image space caused by the lack of bone in four-class Dixon-based attenuation correction. METHODS: A convolutional neural network was trained to predict the four-class AC error map relative to CT-based attenuation correction. Dixon MR images and the four-class attenuation correction µ-map were used as input to the models. CT and PET/MR examinations for 22 patients ([(18)F]FDG) were used for training and validation, and 17 patients were used for testing (6 [(18)F]PSMA-1007 and 11 [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-11). A quantitative analysis of PSMA uptake using voxel- and lesion-based error metrics was used to assess performance. RESULTS: In the voxel-based analysis, the proposed model reduced the median root mean squared percentage error from 12.1% and 8.6% for the four- and five-class Dixon-based AC methods, respectively, to 6.2%. The median absolute percentage error in the maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)) in bone lesions improved from 20.0% and 7.0% for four- and five-class Dixon-based AC methods to 3.8%. CONCLUSION: The proposed method reduces the voxel-based error and SUV(max) errors in bone lesions when compared to the four- and five-class Dixon-based AC models.