Cargando…

Evaluating the risk factors for the development of benign disorders of defaecation: a surgical perspective

PURPOSE: There remains uncertainty as to which risk factors are important for the development of defaecatory problems as a result of heterogeneity of published evidence. Understanding the impact of risk factors may be important in selecting targets for disease prevention or reversal. The aim of this...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chaichanavichkij, P., Hartmann, M., Scott, S. M., Fenton, N., Knowles, C. H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10484816/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37498418
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10151-023-02843-w
_version_ 1785102667044880384
author Chaichanavichkij, P.
Hartmann, M.
Scott, S. M.
Fenton, N.
Knowles, C. H.
author_facet Chaichanavichkij, P.
Hartmann, M.
Scott, S. M.
Fenton, N.
Knowles, C. H.
author_sort Chaichanavichkij, P.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: There remains uncertainty as to which risk factors are important for the development of defaecatory problems as a result of heterogeneity of published evidence. Understanding the impact of risk factors may be important in selecting targets for disease prevention or reversal. The aim of this study was to identify and evaluate risk factors for faecal incontinence and chronic constipation. METHODS: Risk factors for chronic constipation and faecal incontinence were long-listed from scientific literature, then anonymously evaluated (by 50 predominantly colorectal surgical experts from the UK Pelvic Floor Society) using a Delphi technique. Each risk factor was rated as independent, a co-factor, or not a risk factor. Independent risk factors were rated between 1 (not important) and 10 (critically important) with mean (± standard deviation) calculated. RESULTS: Thirty-eight risk factors for chronic constipation were evaluated. Eighteen were classed as independent and 16 as co-factors. Opioid analgesia (7.87 ± 2.05), eating disorders (7.80 ± 1.72), and history of abuse (7.70 ± 1.89) were scored as most important independent risk factors. Female sex (6.60 ± 2.02) was considered an independent risk factor but increasing age was rated a co-factor. Thirty-three risk factors for faecal incontinence were evaluated. Twenty were classed as independent and eight as co-factors. Third- or fourth-degree tear (8.88 ± 1.57), instrumental delivery (8.47 ± 1.58), and grand multiparity (8.00 ± 1.63) were rated most important. Increasing age (7.41 ± 2.14) and female sex (7.58 ± 2.05) were both considered independent risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Several risk factors for chronic constipation and faecal incontinence were selected by Delphi approach. These factors will feed forward into Bayesian models of disease prediction that combine data and expert knowledge. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10151-023-02843-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10484816
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104848162023-09-09 Evaluating the risk factors for the development of benign disorders of defaecation: a surgical perspective Chaichanavichkij, P. Hartmann, M. Scott, S. M. Fenton, N. Knowles, C. H. Tech Coloproctol Original Article PURPOSE: There remains uncertainty as to which risk factors are important for the development of defaecatory problems as a result of heterogeneity of published evidence. Understanding the impact of risk factors may be important in selecting targets for disease prevention or reversal. The aim of this study was to identify and evaluate risk factors for faecal incontinence and chronic constipation. METHODS: Risk factors for chronic constipation and faecal incontinence were long-listed from scientific literature, then anonymously evaluated (by 50 predominantly colorectal surgical experts from the UK Pelvic Floor Society) using a Delphi technique. Each risk factor was rated as independent, a co-factor, or not a risk factor. Independent risk factors were rated between 1 (not important) and 10 (critically important) with mean (± standard deviation) calculated. RESULTS: Thirty-eight risk factors for chronic constipation were evaluated. Eighteen were classed as independent and 16 as co-factors. Opioid analgesia (7.87 ± 2.05), eating disorders (7.80 ± 1.72), and history of abuse (7.70 ± 1.89) were scored as most important independent risk factors. Female sex (6.60 ± 2.02) was considered an independent risk factor but increasing age was rated a co-factor. Thirty-three risk factors for faecal incontinence were evaluated. Twenty were classed as independent and eight as co-factors. Third- or fourth-degree tear (8.88 ± 1.57), instrumental delivery (8.47 ± 1.58), and grand multiparity (8.00 ± 1.63) were rated most important. Increasing age (7.41 ± 2.14) and female sex (7.58 ± 2.05) were both considered independent risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Several risk factors for chronic constipation and faecal incontinence were selected by Delphi approach. These factors will feed forward into Bayesian models of disease prediction that combine data and expert knowledge. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10151-023-02843-w. Springer International Publishing 2023-07-27 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10484816/ /pubmed/37498418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10151-023-02843-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Chaichanavichkij, P.
Hartmann, M.
Scott, S. M.
Fenton, N.
Knowles, C. H.
Evaluating the risk factors for the development of benign disorders of defaecation: a surgical perspective
title Evaluating the risk factors for the development of benign disorders of defaecation: a surgical perspective
title_full Evaluating the risk factors for the development of benign disorders of defaecation: a surgical perspective
title_fullStr Evaluating the risk factors for the development of benign disorders of defaecation: a surgical perspective
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the risk factors for the development of benign disorders of defaecation: a surgical perspective
title_short Evaluating the risk factors for the development of benign disorders of defaecation: a surgical perspective
title_sort evaluating the risk factors for the development of benign disorders of defaecation: a surgical perspective
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10484816/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37498418
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10151-023-02843-w
work_keys_str_mv AT chaichanavichkijp evaluatingtheriskfactorsforthedevelopmentofbenigndisordersofdefaecationasurgicalperspective
AT hartmannm evaluatingtheriskfactorsforthedevelopmentofbenigndisordersofdefaecationasurgicalperspective
AT scottsm evaluatingtheriskfactorsforthedevelopmentofbenigndisordersofdefaecationasurgicalperspective
AT fentonn evaluatingtheriskfactorsforthedevelopmentofbenigndisordersofdefaecationasurgicalperspective
AT knowlesch evaluatingtheriskfactorsforthedevelopmentofbenigndisordersofdefaecationasurgicalperspective
AT evaluatingtheriskfactorsforthedevelopmentofbenigndisordersofdefaecationasurgicalperspective