Cargando…

Fissurectomy versus lateral internal sphincterotomy in the treatment of chronic anal fissures: no advantages in terms of post-operative incontinence

PURPOSE: The standard treatment for chronic anal fissures that have failed non-operative management is lateral internal sphincterotomy. Surgery can cause de novo incontinence. Fissurectomy has been proposed as a sphincter/saving procedure, especially in the presence of a deep posterior pouch with or...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tutino, Roberta, Nigro, Casimiro, Paternostro, Flavia, Federico, Rosa, Lo Secco, Giacomo, Gallo, Gaetano, Santarelli, Mauro, Cocorullo, Gianfranco, Bonventre, Sebastiano
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10485083/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36929471
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10151-023-02780-8
_version_ 1785102718176591872
author Tutino, Roberta
Nigro, Casimiro
Paternostro, Flavia
Federico, Rosa
Lo Secco, Giacomo
Gallo, Gaetano
Santarelli, Mauro
Cocorullo, Gianfranco
Bonventre, Sebastiano
author_facet Tutino, Roberta
Nigro, Casimiro
Paternostro, Flavia
Federico, Rosa
Lo Secco, Giacomo
Gallo, Gaetano
Santarelli, Mauro
Cocorullo, Gianfranco
Bonventre, Sebastiano
author_sort Tutino, Roberta
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The standard treatment for chronic anal fissures that have failed non-operative management is lateral internal sphincterotomy. Surgery can cause de novo incontinence. Fissurectomy has been proposed as a sphincter/saving procedure, especially in the presence of a deep posterior pouch with or without a crypt infection. This study investigated whether fissurectomy offers a benefit in terms of de novo post-operative incontinence. METHODS: Patients surgically managed with fissurectomy or lateral internal sphincterotomy for chronic anal fissures from 2013 to 2019 have been included. Healing rate, changes in continence and patient satisfaction were investigated at long-term follow-up. RESULTS: One hundred twenty patients (55 females, 65 males) were analysed: 29 patients underwent fissurectomy and 91 lateral internal sphincterotomy. Mean follow-up was 55 months [confidence interval (CI) 5–116 months]. Both techniques showed some rate of de novo post-operative incontinence (> +3 Vaizey score points): 8.9% lateral internal sphincterotomy, 17.8% fissurectomy (p = 0.338). The mean Vaizey score in these patients was 10.37 [standard deviation (sd) 6.3] after lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS) and 5.4 (sd 2.3) after fissurectomy Healing rate was 97.8% in the lateral internal sphincterotomy group and 75.8% in the fissurectomy group (p = 0.001). In the lateral internal sphincterotomy group, patients with de novo post-op incontinence showed a statistically significant lower satisfaction rate (9.2 ± 1.57 versus 6.13 ± 3; p = 0.023) while no differences were present in the fissurectomy group (8.87 ± 1.69 versus 7.4 ± 1.14; p = 0.077). CONCLUSIONS: Lateral internal sphincterotomy is confirmed as the preferred technique in term of healing rate. Fissurectomy did not offer a lower rate of de novo post-operative incontinence, but resulted in lower Vaizey scores in patients in whom this occurred. Satisfaction was lower in patients suffering a de novo post-operative incontinence after lateral internal sphincterotomy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10485083
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104850832023-09-09 Fissurectomy versus lateral internal sphincterotomy in the treatment of chronic anal fissures: no advantages in terms of post-operative incontinence Tutino, Roberta Nigro, Casimiro Paternostro, Flavia Federico, Rosa Lo Secco, Giacomo Gallo, Gaetano Santarelli, Mauro Cocorullo, Gianfranco Bonventre, Sebastiano Tech Coloproctol Original Article PURPOSE: The standard treatment for chronic anal fissures that have failed non-operative management is lateral internal sphincterotomy. Surgery can cause de novo incontinence. Fissurectomy has been proposed as a sphincter/saving procedure, especially in the presence of a deep posterior pouch with or without a crypt infection. This study investigated whether fissurectomy offers a benefit in terms of de novo post-operative incontinence. METHODS: Patients surgically managed with fissurectomy or lateral internal sphincterotomy for chronic anal fissures from 2013 to 2019 have been included. Healing rate, changes in continence and patient satisfaction were investigated at long-term follow-up. RESULTS: One hundred twenty patients (55 females, 65 males) were analysed: 29 patients underwent fissurectomy and 91 lateral internal sphincterotomy. Mean follow-up was 55 months [confidence interval (CI) 5–116 months]. Both techniques showed some rate of de novo post-operative incontinence (> +3 Vaizey score points): 8.9% lateral internal sphincterotomy, 17.8% fissurectomy (p = 0.338). The mean Vaizey score in these patients was 10.37 [standard deviation (sd) 6.3] after lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS) and 5.4 (sd 2.3) after fissurectomy Healing rate was 97.8% in the lateral internal sphincterotomy group and 75.8% in the fissurectomy group (p = 0.001). In the lateral internal sphincterotomy group, patients with de novo post-op incontinence showed a statistically significant lower satisfaction rate (9.2 ± 1.57 versus 6.13 ± 3; p = 0.023) while no differences were present in the fissurectomy group (8.87 ± 1.69 versus 7.4 ± 1.14; p = 0.077). CONCLUSIONS: Lateral internal sphincterotomy is confirmed as the preferred technique in term of healing rate. Fissurectomy did not offer a lower rate of de novo post-operative incontinence, but resulted in lower Vaizey scores in patients in whom this occurred. Satisfaction was lower in patients suffering a de novo post-operative incontinence after lateral internal sphincterotomy. Springer International Publishing 2023-03-16 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10485083/ /pubmed/36929471 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10151-023-02780-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Tutino, Roberta
Nigro, Casimiro
Paternostro, Flavia
Federico, Rosa
Lo Secco, Giacomo
Gallo, Gaetano
Santarelli, Mauro
Cocorullo, Gianfranco
Bonventre, Sebastiano
Fissurectomy versus lateral internal sphincterotomy in the treatment of chronic anal fissures: no advantages in terms of post-operative incontinence
title Fissurectomy versus lateral internal sphincterotomy in the treatment of chronic anal fissures: no advantages in terms of post-operative incontinence
title_full Fissurectomy versus lateral internal sphincterotomy in the treatment of chronic anal fissures: no advantages in terms of post-operative incontinence
title_fullStr Fissurectomy versus lateral internal sphincterotomy in the treatment of chronic anal fissures: no advantages in terms of post-operative incontinence
title_full_unstemmed Fissurectomy versus lateral internal sphincterotomy in the treatment of chronic anal fissures: no advantages in terms of post-operative incontinence
title_short Fissurectomy versus lateral internal sphincterotomy in the treatment of chronic anal fissures: no advantages in terms of post-operative incontinence
title_sort fissurectomy versus lateral internal sphincterotomy in the treatment of chronic anal fissures: no advantages in terms of post-operative incontinence
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10485083/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36929471
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10151-023-02780-8
work_keys_str_mv AT tutinoroberta fissurectomyversuslateralinternalsphincterotomyinthetreatmentofchronicanalfissuresnoadvantagesintermsofpostoperativeincontinence
AT nigrocasimiro fissurectomyversuslateralinternalsphincterotomyinthetreatmentofchronicanalfissuresnoadvantagesintermsofpostoperativeincontinence
AT paternostroflavia fissurectomyversuslateralinternalsphincterotomyinthetreatmentofchronicanalfissuresnoadvantagesintermsofpostoperativeincontinence
AT federicorosa fissurectomyversuslateralinternalsphincterotomyinthetreatmentofchronicanalfissuresnoadvantagesintermsofpostoperativeincontinence
AT loseccogiacomo fissurectomyversuslateralinternalsphincterotomyinthetreatmentofchronicanalfissuresnoadvantagesintermsofpostoperativeincontinence
AT gallogaetano fissurectomyversuslateralinternalsphincterotomyinthetreatmentofchronicanalfissuresnoadvantagesintermsofpostoperativeincontinence
AT santarellimauro fissurectomyversuslateralinternalsphincterotomyinthetreatmentofchronicanalfissuresnoadvantagesintermsofpostoperativeincontinence
AT cocorullogianfranco fissurectomyversuslateralinternalsphincterotomyinthetreatmentofchronicanalfissuresnoadvantagesintermsofpostoperativeincontinence
AT bonventresebastiano fissurectomyversuslateralinternalsphincterotomyinthetreatmentofchronicanalfissuresnoadvantagesintermsofpostoperativeincontinence