Cargando…

3D-printed dual holder system for simultaneous rat PET scanning: design and influence on quantification

BACKGROUND: The low throughout of small animal positron emission tomography (PET) images acquisitions represents a substantial limitation. The aims of this study were (i) to design a low-cost support for simultaneous dynamic PET scanning of two lying rats and (ii) to study its impact on brain image...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bouillot, Caroline, Daligault, Sébastien, Bolbos, Radu, Costes, Nicolas, Zimmer, Luc
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10485197/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37676475
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-023-01027-9
_version_ 1785102737883529216
author Bouillot, Caroline
Daligault, Sébastien
Bolbos, Radu
Costes, Nicolas
Zimmer, Luc
author_facet Bouillot, Caroline
Daligault, Sébastien
Bolbos, Radu
Costes, Nicolas
Zimmer, Luc
author_sort Bouillot, Caroline
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The low throughout of small animal positron emission tomography (PET) images acquisitions represents a substantial limitation. The aims of this study were (i) to design a low-cost support for simultaneous dynamic PET scanning of two lying rats and (ii) to study its impact on brain image quantification. RESULTS: Accuracy of concentration measurement was 5.5% for one phantom in the field of view, and 5.7% for two phantoms measured simultaneously. Ratio concentration between phantoms showed an error of 6.7% ± 5.1% for Solo upper position, 6.7% ± 3.7% for Solo lower position, 5.9% ± 4.3% for Duo upper position, and 7.4% ± 6% for Duo lower position 6.7% for separated measures, and 6.6% for simultaneous measures. In vivo distribution profiles showed no difference between solo and duo uptakes. Region of Interest quantification in the whole brain showed 4.4% variability solo and 3.5% duo. The quantified test–retest bias was 8% in solo and 5% in duo, and the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient was comparable in solo and duo (0.969 vs. 0.966). CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed that simultaneous scans of two rats in INVEON do not affect quantification. The dual support system will allow us to reduce protocol costs and duration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10485197
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104851972023-09-09 3D-printed dual holder system for simultaneous rat PET scanning: design and influence on quantification Bouillot, Caroline Daligault, Sébastien Bolbos, Radu Costes, Nicolas Zimmer, Luc EJNMMI Res Original Research BACKGROUND: The low throughout of small animal positron emission tomography (PET) images acquisitions represents a substantial limitation. The aims of this study were (i) to design a low-cost support for simultaneous dynamic PET scanning of two lying rats and (ii) to study its impact on brain image quantification. RESULTS: Accuracy of concentration measurement was 5.5% for one phantom in the field of view, and 5.7% for two phantoms measured simultaneously. Ratio concentration between phantoms showed an error of 6.7% ± 5.1% for Solo upper position, 6.7% ± 3.7% for Solo lower position, 5.9% ± 4.3% for Duo upper position, and 7.4% ± 6% for Duo lower position 6.7% for separated measures, and 6.6% for simultaneous measures. In vivo distribution profiles showed no difference between solo and duo uptakes. Region of Interest quantification in the whole brain showed 4.4% variability solo and 3.5% duo. The quantified test–retest bias was 8% in solo and 5% in duo, and the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient was comparable in solo and duo (0.969 vs. 0.966). CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed that simultaneous scans of two rats in INVEON do not affect quantification. The dual support system will allow us to reduce protocol costs and duration. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10485197/ /pubmed/37676475 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-023-01027-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Bouillot, Caroline
Daligault, Sébastien
Bolbos, Radu
Costes, Nicolas
Zimmer, Luc
3D-printed dual holder system for simultaneous rat PET scanning: design and influence on quantification
title 3D-printed dual holder system for simultaneous rat PET scanning: design and influence on quantification
title_full 3D-printed dual holder system for simultaneous rat PET scanning: design and influence on quantification
title_fullStr 3D-printed dual holder system for simultaneous rat PET scanning: design and influence on quantification
title_full_unstemmed 3D-printed dual holder system for simultaneous rat PET scanning: design and influence on quantification
title_short 3D-printed dual holder system for simultaneous rat PET scanning: design and influence on quantification
title_sort 3d-printed dual holder system for simultaneous rat pet scanning: design and influence on quantification
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10485197/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37676475
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-023-01027-9
work_keys_str_mv AT bouillotcaroline 3dprinteddualholdersystemforsimultaneousratpetscanningdesignandinfluenceonquantification
AT daligaultsebastien 3dprinteddualholdersystemforsimultaneousratpetscanningdesignandinfluenceonquantification
AT bolbosradu 3dprinteddualholdersystemforsimultaneousratpetscanningdesignandinfluenceonquantification
AT costesnicolas 3dprinteddualholdersystemforsimultaneousratpetscanningdesignandinfluenceonquantification
AT zimmerluc 3dprinteddualholdersystemforsimultaneousratpetscanningdesignandinfluenceonquantification