Cargando…

How do (false) positively screened patients experience a screening programme for liver cirrhosis or fibrosis in Germany? A qualitative study

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore psychosocial consequences of (false) positive liver screening results and to identify influencing factors for perceived strain within a multistage screening programme for liver cirrhosis and fibrosis in Germany. METHODS: Between June 2018 and May 2019, all posi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fichtner, Urs A., Arslanow, Anita, Binder, Harald, Galle, Peter R., Labenz, Christian, Lammert, Frank, Ortner, Julia, Stelzer, Dominikus, Velthuis, Louis, Farin‐Glattacker, Erik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10485303/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37334867
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13800
_version_ 1785102755239559168
author Fichtner, Urs A.
Arslanow, Anita
Binder, Harald
Galle, Peter R.
Labenz, Christian
Lammert, Frank
Ortner, Julia
Stelzer, Dominikus
Velthuis, Louis
Farin‐Glattacker, Erik
author_facet Fichtner, Urs A.
Arslanow, Anita
Binder, Harald
Galle, Peter R.
Labenz, Christian
Lammert, Frank
Ortner, Julia
Stelzer, Dominikus
Velthuis, Louis
Farin‐Glattacker, Erik
author_sort Fichtner, Urs A.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore psychosocial consequences of (false) positive liver screening results and to identify influencing factors for perceived strain within a multistage screening programme for liver cirrhosis and fibrosis in Germany. METHODS: Between June 2018 and May 2019, all positively screened patients were asked to participate in the study (n = 158). N = 11 telephone interviews and n = 4 follow‐up interviews were conducted. Semi‐structured telephone interviews were carried out. The analysis followed a structuring content analysis approach. Thereby, categories were first defined deductively. Second, the categories were revised inductively based on the data. RESULTS: The main themes found regarding the consequences of the screening were categorised in emotional reactions and behavioural reactions. Few respondents described negative emotional consequences related to screening. Those seem to be mostly driven by suboptimal patient–provider communication and might be worsened when transparent information transfer fails to happen. As a result, patients sought information and support in their social environment. All patients reported positive attitudes towards liver screening. CONCLUSION: To reduce the potential occurrence of psychosocial consequences during the screening process, medical screening should be performed in the context of transparent information. Regular health communication on the side of health professionals and increasing patients' health literacy might contribute to avoiding negative emotions in line with screening. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This study recognises the wide‐ranging patients' perspectives regarding the consequences of liver screening which should be taken into consideration when implementing a new screening programme to ensure a patient‐centred approach.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10485303
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104853032023-09-09 How do (false) positively screened patients experience a screening programme for liver cirrhosis or fibrosis in Germany? A qualitative study Fichtner, Urs A. Arslanow, Anita Binder, Harald Galle, Peter R. Labenz, Christian Lammert, Frank Ortner, Julia Stelzer, Dominikus Velthuis, Louis Farin‐Glattacker, Erik Health Expect Original Articles OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore psychosocial consequences of (false) positive liver screening results and to identify influencing factors for perceived strain within a multistage screening programme for liver cirrhosis and fibrosis in Germany. METHODS: Between June 2018 and May 2019, all positively screened patients were asked to participate in the study (n = 158). N = 11 telephone interviews and n = 4 follow‐up interviews were conducted. Semi‐structured telephone interviews were carried out. The analysis followed a structuring content analysis approach. Thereby, categories were first defined deductively. Second, the categories were revised inductively based on the data. RESULTS: The main themes found regarding the consequences of the screening were categorised in emotional reactions and behavioural reactions. Few respondents described negative emotional consequences related to screening. Those seem to be mostly driven by suboptimal patient–provider communication and might be worsened when transparent information transfer fails to happen. As a result, patients sought information and support in their social environment. All patients reported positive attitudes towards liver screening. CONCLUSION: To reduce the potential occurrence of psychosocial consequences during the screening process, medical screening should be performed in the context of transparent information. Regular health communication on the side of health professionals and increasing patients' health literacy might contribute to avoiding negative emotions in line with screening. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This study recognises the wide‐ranging patients' perspectives regarding the consequences of liver screening which should be taken into consideration when implementing a new screening programme to ensure a patient‐centred approach. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10485303/ /pubmed/37334867 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13800 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Health Expectations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Fichtner, Urs A.
Arslanow, Anita
Binder, Harald
Galle, Peter R.
Labenz, Christian
Lammert, Frank
Ortner, Julia
Stelzer, Dominikus
Velthuis, Louis
Farin‐Glattacker, Erik
How do (false) positively screened patients experience a screening programme for liver cirrhosis or fibrosis in Germany? A qualitative study
title How do (false) positively screened patients experience a screening programme for liver cirrhosis or fibrosis in Germany? A qualitative study
title_full How do (false) positively screened patients experience a screening programme for liver cirrhosis or fibrosis in Germany? A qualitative study
title_fullStr How do (false) positively screened patients experience a screening programme for liver cirrhosis or fibrosis in Germany? A qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed How do (false) positively screened patients experience a screening programme for liver cirrhosis or fibrosis in Germany? A qualitative study
title_short How do (false) positively screened patients experience a screening programme for liver cirrhosis or fibrosis in Germany? A qualitative study
title_sort how do (false) positively screened patients experience a screening programme for liver cirrhosis or fibrosis in germany? a qualitative study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10485303/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37334867
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13800
work_keys_str_mv AT fichtnerursa howdofalsepositivelyscreenedpatientsexperienceascreeningprogrammeforlivercirrhosisorfibrosisingermanyaqualitativestudy
AT arslanowanita howdofalsepositivelyscreenedpatientsexperienceascreeningprogrammeforlivercirrhosisorfibrosisingermanyaqualitativestudy
AT binderharald howdofalsepositivelyscreenedpatientsexperienceascreeningprogrammeforlivercirrhosisorfibrosisingermanyaqualitativestudy
AT gallepeterr howdofalsepositivelyscreenedpatientsexperienceascreeningprogrammeforlivercirrhosisorfibrosisingermanyaqualitativestudy
AT labenzchristian howdofalsepositivelyscreenedpatientsexperienceascreeningprogrammeforlivercirrhosisorfibrosisingermanyaqualitativestudy
AT lammertfrank howdofalsepositivelyscreenedpatientsexperienceascreeningprogrammeforlivercirrhosisorfibrosisingermanyaqualitativestudy
AT ortnerjulia howdofalsepositivelyscreenedpatientsexperienceascreeningprogrammeforlivercirrhosisorfibrosisingermanyaqualitativestudy
AT stelzerdominikus howdofalsepositivelyscreenedpatientsexperienceascreeningprogrammeforlivercirrhosisorfibrosisingermanyaqualitativestudy
AT velthuislouis howdofalsepositivelyscreenedpatientsexperienceascreeningprogrammeforlivercirrhosisorfibrosisingermanyaqualitativestudy
AT faringlattackererik howdofalsepositivelyscreenedpatientsexperienceascreeningprogrammeforlivercirrhosisorfibrosisingermanyaqualitativestudy