Cargando…
#TreatmentResistantDepression: A qualitative content analysis of Tweets about difficult‐to‐treat depression
INTRODUCTION: Treatment‐resistant depression (TRD) is depression unresponsive to antidepressants and affects 55% of British primary care users with depression. Current evidence is from secondary care, but long referral times mean general practitioners (GPs) manage TRD. Studies show that people with...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10485331/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37350377 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13807 |
_version_ | 1785102762007068672 |
---|---|
author | Talbot, Amelia Ford, Tori Ryan, Sara Mahtani, Kamal R. Albury, Charlotte |
author_facet | Talbot, Amelia Ford, Tori Ryan, Sara Mahtani, Kamal R. Albury, Charlotte |
author_sort | Talbot, Amelia |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Treatment‐resistant depression (TRD) is depression unresponsive to antidepressants and affects 55% of British primary care users with depression. Current evidence is from secondary care, but long referral times mean general practitioners (GPs) manage TRD. Studies show that people with depression use Twitter to form community and document symptoms. However, Twitter remains a largely unexplored space of documented patient experience. Twitter data could provide valuable insights into learning about primary care experiences of TRD. In this study, we explored Twitter comments and conversations about TRD and produced patient‐driven recommendations. METHODS: Tweets from UK‐based users were collected manually and using a browser extension in June 2021. Conventional content analysis was used to provide an overview of the Tweets, followed by interpretation to understand why Twitter may be important to people with TRD. RESULTS: A total of 415 Tweets were organised into five clusters: self‐diagnosis, symptoms, support, small wins and condition experts. These Tweets were interpreted as showing Twitter as a community for people with TRD. People had a collective sense of illness identity and were united in their experiences of TRD. However, users in the community also highlighted the absence of effective GP care, leading users to position themselves as condition experts. Users shared advice from a place of lived experience with the community but also shared potentially harmful information, including recommendations about nonevidence‐based medications. CONCLUSIONS: Findings illuminate the benefits of the TRD Twitter community and also highlight that the perception of a lack of knowledge and support from GPs may lead community members to advise nonevidenced‐based medications. PATIENT AND PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This study was led by a person with lived experience of TRD and bipolar. Two public contributors with mental health conditions gave feedback on our study protocol and results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10485331 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104853312023-09-09 #TreatmentResistantDepression: A qualitative content analysis of Tweets about difficult‐to‐treat depression Talbot, Amelia Ford, Tori Ryan, Sara Mahtani, Kamal R. Albury, Charlotte Health Expect Original Articles INTRODUCTION: Treatment‐resistant depression (TRD) is depression unresponsive to antidepressants and affects 55% of British primary care users with depression. Current evidence is from secondary care, but long referral times mean general practitioners (GPs) manage TRD. Studies show that people with depression use Twitter to form community and document symptoms. However, Twitter remains a largely unexplored space of documented patient experience. Twitter data could provide valuable insights into learning about primary care experiences of TRD. In this study, we explored Twitter comments and conversations about TRD and produced patient‐driven recommendations. METHODS: Tweets from UK‐based users were collected manually and using a browser extension in June 2021. Conventional content analysis was used to provide an overview of the Tweets, followed by interpretation to understand why Twitter may be important to people with TRD. RESULTS: A total of 415 Tweets were organised into five clusters: self‐diagnosis, symptoms, support, small wins and condition experts. These Tweets were interpreted as showing Twitter as a community for people with TRD. People had a collective sense of illness identity and were united in their experiences of TRD. However, users in the community also highlighted the absence of effective GP care, leading users to position themselves as condition experts. Users shared advice from a place of lived experience with the community but also shared potentially harmful information, including recommendations about nonevidence‐based medications. CONCLUSIONS: Findings illuminate the benefits of the TRD Twitter community and also highlight that the perception of a lack of knowledge and support from GPs may lead community members to advise nonevidenced‐based medications. PATIENT AND PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This study was led by a person with lived experience of TRD and bipolar. Two public contributors with mental health conditions gave feedback on our study protocol and results. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10485331/ /pubmed/37350377 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13807 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Health Expectations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Talbot, Amelia Ford, Tori Ryan, Sara Mahtani, Kamal R. Albury, Charlotte #TreatmentResistantDepression: A qualitative content analysis of Tweets about difficult‐to‐treat depression |
title | #TreatmentResistantDepression: A qualitative content analysis of Tweets about difficult‐to‐treat depression |
title_full | #TreatmentResistantDepression: A qualitative content analysis of Tweets about difficult‐to‐treat depression |
title_fullStr | #TreatmentResistantDepression: A qualitative content analysis of Tweets about difficult‐to‐treat depression |
title_full_unstemmed | #TreatmentResistantDepression: A qualitative content analysis of Tweets about difficult‐to‐treat depression |
title_short | #TreatmentResistantDepression: A qualitative content analysis of Tweets about difficult‐to‐treat depression |
title_sort | #treatmentresistantdepression: a qualitative content analysis of tweets about difficult‐to‐treat depression |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10485331/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37350377 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13807 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT talbotamelia treatmentresistantdepressionaqualitativecontentanalysisoftweetsaboutdifficulttotreatdepression AT fordtori treatmentresistantdepressionaqualitativecontentanalysisoftweetsaboutdifficulttotreatdepression AT ryansara treatmentresistantdepressionaqualitativecontentanalysisoftweetsaboutdifficulttotreatdepression AT mahtanikamalr treatmentresistantdepressionaqualitativecontentanalysisoftweetsaboutdifficulttotreatdepression AT alburycharlotte treatmentresistantdepressionaqualitativecontentanalysisoftweetsaboutdifficulttotreatdepression |