Cargando…

Measuring cannabis quantities in online surveys: A rapid review and proposals for ways forward

OBJECTIVES: Cannabis use quantities are relevant for determining cannabis‐related harms. This research aims to provide an overview of the available methods to assess quantities through self‐report. METHODS: A rapid review of various strategies to collect information on cannabis use quantities throug...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Manthey, Jakob, Pons‐Cabrera, Maria Teresa, Rosenkranz, Moritz, Lopez‐Pelayo, Hugo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10485338/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37089041
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1971
_version_ 1785102763610341376
author Manthey, Jakob
Pons‐Cabrera, Maria Teresa
Rosenkranz, Moritz
Lopez‐Pelayo, Hugo
author_facet Manthey, Jakob
Pons‐Cabrera, Maria Teresa
Rosenkranz, Moritz
Lopez‐Pelayo, Hugo
author_sort Manthey, Jakob
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Cannabis use quantities are relevant for determining cannabis‐related harms. This research aims to provide an overview of the available methods to assess quantities through self‐report. METHODS: A rapid review of various strategies to collect information on cannabis use quantities through self‐report. Two independent literature searches resulted in n = 38 studies included for review. RESULTS: A total of n = 14 studies employed methods for collecting cannabis use quantities that are not suitable for online surveys (e.g., rolling a fake joint). Of the remaining n = 24 studies with items that are suitable for online surveys, the quantity assessment was performed in three different ways. The data collection was either carried out by asking (a) for the total number of joints (i.e., crude joint method), (b) for the total weight (i.e., crude weight method), or (c) for specific products separately, for example, for the amount of flower and resin (i.e., product‐specific method). In only n = 8 studies, cannabis use quantities were ascertained by providing visual aids (e.g., illustration of various amounts of flower). CONCLUSIONS: The crude joint method and the product‐specific method are the two most promising methods to collect information on cannabis use quantities. Using visual aids may potentially improve the accuracy of those methods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10485338
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104853382023-09-09 Measuring cannabis quantities in online surveys: A rapid review and proposals for ways forward Manthey, Jakob Pons‐Cabrera, Maria Teresa Rosenkranz, Moritz Lopez‐Pelayo, Hugo Int J Methods Psychiatr Res Invited Review OBJECTIVES: Cannabis use quantities are relevant for determining cannabis‐related harms. This research aims to provide an overview of the available methods to assess quantities through self‐report. METHODS: A rapid review of various strategies to collect information on cannabis use quantities through self‐report. Two independent literature searches resulted in n = 38 studies included for review. RESULTS: A total of n = 14 studies employed methods for collecting cannabis use quantities that are not suitable for online surveys (e.g., rolling a fake joint). Of the remaining n = 24 studies with items that are suitable for online surveys, the quantity assessment was performed in three different ways. The data collection was either carried out by asking (a) for the total number of joints (i.e., crude joint method), (b) for the total weight (i.e., crude weight method), or (c) for specific products separately, for example, for the amount of flower and resin (i.e., product‐specific method). In only n = 8 studies, cannabis use quantities were ascertained by providing visual aids (e.g., illustration of various amounts of flower). CONCLUSIONS: The crude joint method and the product‐specific method are the two most promising methods to collect information on cannabis use quantities. Using visual aids may potentially improve the accuracy of those methods. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-04-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10485338/ /pubmed/37089041 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1971 Text en © 2023 The Authors. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Invited Review
Manthey, Jakob
Pons‐Cabrera, Maria Teresa
Rosenkranz, Moritz
Lopez‐Pelayo, Hugo
Measuring cannabis quantities in online surveys: A rapid review and proposals for ways forward
title Measuring cannabis quantities in online surveys: A rapid review and proposals for ways forward
title_full Measuring cannabis quantities in online surveys: A rapid review and proposals for ways forward
title_fullStr Measuring cannabis quantities in online surveys: A rapid review and proposals for ways forward
title_full_unstemmed Measuring cannabis quantities in online surveys: A rapid review and proposals for ways forward
title_short Measuring cannabis quantities in online surveys: A rapid review and proposals for ways forward
title_sort measuring cannabis quantities in online surveys: a rapid review and proposals for ways forward
topic Invited Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10485338/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37089041
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1971
work_keys_str_mv AT mantheyjakob measuringcannabisquantitiesinonlinesurveysarapidreviewandproposalsforwaysforward
AT ponscabreramariateresa measuringcannabisquantitiesinonlinesurveysarapidreviewandproposalsforwaysforward
AT rosenkranzmoritz measuringcannabisquantitiesinonlinesurveysarapidreviewandproposalsforwaysforward
AT lopezpelayohugo measuringcannabisquantitiesinonlinesurveysarapidreviewandproposalsforwaysforward