Comparison of 2-Octyl Cyanoacrylate with Prolene (4-0) Sutures in Extra Oral Wound Closure

AIM: To compare the healing following various maxillofacial incisions using 2-octyl cyanoacrylate (2-OCA) and prolene (4–0) sutures. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the complications and aesthetic outcome of the incision wounds after closure using 2-OCA and prolene (4–0) sutures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kumar, Padam, Katiyar, Alpana, Tripathi, Ashish, Gupta, Asmita, Srivastav, Anubha, Uppal, Bhavneet S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023
Materias:
Original Article
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10485427/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37694012
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_103_23
Descripción
Sumario:AIM: To compare the healing following various maxillofacial incisions using 2-octyl cyanoacrylate (2-OCA) and prolene (4–0) sutures. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the complications and aesthetic outcome of the incision wounds after closure using 2-OCA and prolene (4–0) sutures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The patient undergoing an extraoral incision was evaluated for pain, inflammation, infection, dehiscence, scar, and surface texture. In Group I, 15 patient incisions were closed with 2-OCA and in Group II, 15 patient incisions were closed with prolene (4–0) suture. RESULT: A few patients experienced pain with Group I and then Group II, but infection, inflammation, and dehiscence were more in Group I than in Group II. CONCLUSION: A cosmetic outcome was higher in the cyanoacrylate group, and the surface texture was satisfying in the same group.

Ejemplares similares