Cargando…

A Finite Element Analysis of Stress Allocation around Three Types of Abutment–Implant Interfaces

OBJECTIVES: This study examined the effects of stress distribution at three abutment–implant interfaces on various implant systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Group I: tri-channel internal connection (Nobel Biocare), Group II: 1.5-mm deep internal hex (BioHorizons Co. Birmingham, USA), and Group III: AD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Devanna, Raghu, Awinashe, Vaibhav, Priyadarshi, Siddharth, Ramaiah, Vardharajula Venkata, Gupta, Aashi, Jain, Amol
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10485430/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37693997
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_213_23
_version_ 1785102783941181440
author Devanna, Raghu
Awinashe, Vaibhav
Priyadarshi, Siddharth
Ramaiah, Vardharajula Venkata
Gupta, Aashi
Jain, Amol
author_facet Devanna, Raghu
Awinashe, Vaibhav
Priyadarshi, Siddharth
Ramaiah, Vardharajula Venkata
Gupta, Aashi
Jain, Amol
author_sort Devanna, Raghu
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This study examined the effects of stress distribution at three abutment–implant interfaces on various implant systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Group I: tri-channel internal connection (Nobel Biocare), Group II: 1.5-mm deep internal hex (BioHorizons Co. Birmingham, USA), and Group III: ADIN Touareg, to create computerized models of implants and mandibular modeling software, close fit WP, ANSYS Version 14.0 for finite element analysis (FEA), Hypermesh 12 for meshing and CATIA were used. A top-notch scanner was used to scan the implant. CATIA software created computerized models using all the aforementioned data. By applying bonded state on the abutment–implant borders and four various load conditions within the implant system, finite element method modeling was carried out. The computerized model was imported into the ANSYS program. To compare the groups, a statistical analysis was conducted. RESULT: Through the use of three-dimensional FEA, the samples were assessed. Stress was found to be utmost in Group I, followed by Group III and Group II, at 80 N, 80 N with a 15° tilt, 250 N, and 250 N with a 15° tilt, and the divergence was statistically inconsequential. CONCLUSION: The tri-channel internal connection displayed the highest stresses compared to the internal hex within the constraints of the current study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10485430
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104854302023-09-09 A Finite Element Analysis of Stress Allocation around Three Types of Abutment–Implant Interfaces Devanna, Raghu Awinashe, Vaibhav Priyadarshi, Siddharth Ramaiah, Vardharajula Venkata Gupta, Aashi Jain, Amol J Pharm Bioallied Sci Original Article OBJECTIVES: This study examined the effects of stress distribution at three abutment–implant interfaces on various implant systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Group I: tri-channel internal connection (Nobel Biocare), Group II: 1.5-mm deep internal hex (BioHorizons Co. Birmingham, USA), and Group III: ADIN Touareg, to create computerized models of implants and mandibular modeling software, close fit WP, ANSYS Version 14.0 for finite element analysis (FEA), Hypermesh 12 for meshing and CATIA were used. A top-notch scanner was used to scan the implant. CATIA software created computerized models using all the aforementioned data. By applying bonded state on the abutment–implant borders and four various load conditions within the implant system, finite element method modeling was carried out. The computerized model was imported into the ANSYS program. To compare the groups, a statistical analysis was conducted. RESULT: Through the use of three-dimensional FEA, the samples were assessed. Stress was found to be utmost in Group I, followed by Group III and Group II, at 80 N, 80 N with a 15° tilt, 250 N, and 250 N with a 15° tilt, and the divergence was statistically inconsequential. CONCLUSION: The tri-channel internal connection displayed the highest stresses compared to the internal hex within the constraints of the current study. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023-07 2023-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10485430/ /pubmed/37693997 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_213_23 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Devanna, Raghu
Awinashe, Vaibhav
Priyadarshi, Siddharth
Ramaiah, Vardharajula Venkata
Gupta, Aashi
Jain, Amol
A Finite Element Analysis of Stress Allocation around Three Types of Abutment–Implant Interfaces
title A Finite Element Analysis of Stress Allocation around Three Types of Abutment–Implant Interfaces
title_full A Finite Element Analysis of Stress Allocation around Three Types of Abutment–Implant Interfaces
title_fullStr A Finite Element Analysis of Stress Allocation around Three Types of Abutment–Implant Interfaces
title_full_unstemmed A Finite Element Analysis of Stress Allocation around Three Types of Abutment–Implant Interfaces
title_short A Finite Element Analysis of Stress Allocation around Three Types of Abutment–Implant Interfaces
title_sort finite element analysis of stress allocation around three types of abutment–implant interfaces
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10485430/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37693997
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_213_23
work_keys_str_mv AT devannaraghu afiniteelementanalysisofstressallocationaroundthreetypesofabutmentimplantinterfaces
AT awinashevaibhav afiniteelementanalysisofstressallocationaroundthreetypesofabutmentimplantinterfaces
AT priyadarshisiddharth afiniteelementanalysisofstressallocationaroundthreetypesofabutmentimplantinterfaces
AT ramaiahvardharajulavenkata afiniteelementanalysisofstressallocationaroundthreetypesofabutmentimplantinterfaces
AT guptaaashi afiniteelementanalysisofstressallocationaroundthreetypesofabutmentimplantinterfaces
AT jainamol afiniteelementanalysisofstressallocationaroundthreetypesofabutmentimplantinterfaces
AT devannaraghu finiteelementanalysisofstressallocationaroundthreetypesofabutmentimplantinterfaces
AT awinashevaibhav finiteelementanalysisofstressallocationaroundthreetypesofabutmentimplantinterfaces
AT priyadarshisiddharth finiteelementanalysisofstressallocationaroundthreetypesofabutmentimplantinterfaces
AT ramaiahvardharajulavenkata finiteelementanalysisofstressallocationaroundthreetypesofabutmentimplantinterfaces
AT guptaaashi finiteelementanalysisofstressallocationaroundthreetypesofabutmentimplantinterfaces
AT jainamol finiteelementanalysisofstressallocationaroundthreetypesofabutmentimplantinterfaces