Cargando…
Serum and Saliva LDH Levels in Patients with Habit, Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders (OPMDs), and Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma (OSCC): A Spectrophotometry Study
BACKGROUND: Oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs) are chronic lesions or conditions characterized by a potential for malignant transformation. One of the hallmarks of cancer is aerobic glycolysis which confers immortality to cancer cells, correlates with the belligerent behavior of various ma...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10485454/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37694076 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_90_23 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: Oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs) are chronic lesions or conditions characterized by a potential for malignant transformation. One of the hallmarks of cancer is aerobic glycolysis which confers immortality to cancer cells, correlates with the belligerent behavior of various malignancies, and shows an increase in the expression of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). The present study was conducted to measure and compare serum and salivary LDH levels in patients with habit, OPMDs and oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) patients, and to evaluate if LDH levels can be used as a biomarker in the progression into potentially malignant disorders (PMDs), the prognosis of OSCC, and to assess if saliva is a better biomarker. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty patients of both genders were divided into three groups. Group I had patients with habits, group II had OPMDs, and group III had OSCC with 10 subjects from each group. Saliva and serum of patients were collected according to the standard protocol and measured for LDH using spectrophotometry of 340 nm. RESULTS: Group I had patients with habits, group II had OPMDs, and group III had OSCC. Group I had 6 males and 4 females, group II had 8 males and 2 females, and group III had 7 males and 3 females. The mean serum LDH level in group I was 265.50, in group II was 194.10, and in group III was 224.22. The difference was non-significant (P > 0.05). The mean salivary LDH level in group I was 345.68, in group II was 532.72, and in group III was 1.105. The difference was significant (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Salivary LDH is a non-invasive, cost-effective technique, which can be used as an effective modality for the diagnosis and prognosis of oral cancer as well as for monitoring tobacco users and OPMDs. |
---|