Cargando…

Comparison of Two High Dose Rate Brachytherapy Regimes

BACKGROUND: Two HDR brachytherapy regimes were compared, 9.5 Gray per fraction for two fractions and 7.5 Gray per fraction for three fractions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 80 patients with histologically evident squamous cell carcinoma cervix were taken in the current research after randomizat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jaswal, Gaurav, Benipal, Raja, Bhatty, Seema G., Garg, Pardeep, Kang, Manraj S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10485489/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37694100
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_221_23
_version_ 1785102798195523584
author Jaswal, Gaurav
Benipal, Raja
Bhatty, Seema G.
Garg, Pardeep
Kang, Manraj S.
author_facet Jaswal, Gaurav
Benipal, Raja
Bhatty, Seema G.
Garg, Pardeep
Kang, Manraj S.
author_sort Jaswal, Gaurav
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Two HDR brachytherapy regimes were compared, 9.5 Gray per fraction for two fractions and 7.5 Gray per fraction for three fractions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 80 patients with histologically evident squamous cell carcinoma cervix were taken in the current research after randomization. Radiotherapy dose delivered was 50 Gray/25#/5 weeks with concomitant chemotherapy with weekly cisplatin 35 mg/m(2). Following external chemoradiation, patients were randomized into two arms. In Arm A, 40 patients were given high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy of weekly 7.5 Gray in three fractions over 3 weeks. In Arm B, 40 patients were given high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy of weekly 9.5 Gray in two fractions over 2 weeks. BED and LQED had been calculated, and the evaluation of response and consequences was examined. RESULTS: In Arm A, BED to point A was 99.38 ± 0.00 and EQD2 to point A was 82.81 ± 0.00. In Arm B, BED to point A was 97.05 ± 0.00 and EQD2 to point A was 80.89 ± 0.00. With respect to rectum in Arm A, BED rectum was 108.66 ± 11.43 and EQD2 rectum was 65.07 ± 6.84. In Arm B, BED rectum was 107 ± 10.83 and EQD2 rectum was 64.21 ± 6.49. Similarly in Arm A, BED bladder was 107.86 ± 10.23 and EQD2 bladder was 64.59 ± 6.13. In arm B, BED bladder was 104.14 ± 10.79 and EQD2 bladder was 62.36 ± 6.46. CONCLUSION: In a follow-up of 6 months, no statistical significance in terms of local control as well as complications rates in both the arms. Our research demonstrates that two fractions of HDR are comparable with three fractions of HDR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10485489
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104854892023-09-09 Comparison of Two High Dose Rate Brachytherapy Regimes Jaswal, Gaurav Benipal, Raja Bhatty, Seema G. Garg, Pardeep Kang, Manraj S. J Pharm Bioallied Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: Two HDR brachytherapy regimes were compared, 9.5 Gray per fraction for two fractions and 7.5 Gray per fraction for three fractions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 80 patients with histologically evident squamous cell carcinoma cervix were taken in the current research after randomization. Radiotherapy dose delivered was 50 Gray/25#/5 weeks with concomitant chemotherapy with weekly cisplatin 35 mg/m(2). Following external chemoradiation, patients were randomized into two arms. In Arm A, 40 patients were given high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy of weekly 7.5 Gray in three fractions over 3 weeks. In Arm B, 40 patients were given high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy of weekly 9.5 Gray in two fractions over 2 weeks. BED and LQED had been calculated, and the evaluation of response and consequences was examined. RESULTS: In Arm A, BED to point A was 99.38 ± 0.00 and EQD2 to point A was 82.81 ± 0.00. In Arm B, BED to point A was 97.05 ± 0.00 and EQD2 to point A was 80.89 ± 0.00. With respect to rectum in Arm A, BED rectum was 108.66 ± 11.43 and EQD2 rectum was 65.07 ± 6.84. In Arm B, BED rectum was 107 ± 10.83 and EQD2 rectum was 64.21 ± 6.49. Similarly in Arm A, BED bladder was 107.86 ± 10.23 and EQD2 bladder was 64.59 ± 6.13. In arm B, BED bladder was 104.14 ± 10.79 and EQD2 bladder was 62.36 ± 6.46. CONCLUSION: In a follow-up of 6 months, no statistical significance in terms of local control as well as complications rates in both the arms. Our research demonstrates that two fractions of HDR are comparable with three fractions of HDR. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023-07 2023-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10485489/ /pubmed/37694100 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_221_23 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Jaswal, Gaurav
Benipal, Raja
Bhatty, Seema G.
Garg, Pardeep
Kang, Manraj S.
Comparison of Two High Dose Rate Brachytherapy Regimes
title Comparison of Two High Dose Rate Brachytherapy Regimes
title_full Comparison of Two High Dose Rate Brachytherapy Regimes
title_fullStr Comparison of Two High Dose Rate Brachytherapy Regimes
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Two High Dose Rate Brachytherapy Regimes
title_short Comparison of Two High Dose Rate Brachytherapy Regimes
title_sort comparison of two high dose rate brachytherapy regimes
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10485489/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37694100
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_221_23
work_keys_str_mv AT jaswalgaurav comparisonoftwohighdoseratebrachytherapyregimes
AT benipalraja comparisonoftwohighdoseratebrachytherapyregimes
AT bhattyseemag comparisonoftwohighdoseratebrachytherapyregimes
AT gargpardeep comparisonoftwohighdoseratebrachytherapyregimes
AT kangmanrajs comparisonoftwohighdoseratebrachytherapyregimes