Cargando…

A Comparative Evaluation of Vertical Marginal Gap for Vented and Precemented Cad-Cam Zirconium Copings on Angulated Abutments: An In vitro Study

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate vertical marginal gap after cementation of Zr (zirconium) copings with palatal vent, open vent, and precementation technique on angulated abutments resulting from cement entrapment between intaglio surface of copings and angulated abutments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Passanha, Divya N., Sankeshwari, Banashree, Pattanshetti, Channaveer, Dhole, Rohit, Miyyapuram, Sonica, Zawar, Yash
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10485502/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37693993
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_283_23
_version_ 1785102801382146048
author Passanha, Divya N.
Sankeshwari, Banashree
Pattanshetti, Channaveer
Dhole, Rohit
Miyyapuram, Sonica
Zawar, Yash
author_facet Passanha, Divya N.
Sankeshwari, Banashree
Pattanshetti, Channaveer
Dhole, Rohit
Miyyapuram, Sonica
Zawar, Yash
author_sort Passanha, Divya N.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate vertical marginal gap after cementation of Zr (zirconium) copings with palatal vent, open vent, and precementation technique on angulated abutments resulting from cement entrapment between intaglio surface of copings and angulated abutments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four angled abutments and 24 CAD-CAM Zr copings were assigned to three groups depending on the type of cementation technique, comprising eight copings with palatal vent, open vent, and no vent, respectively. Vertical marginal gaps between abutment shoulder and coping margin were evaluated at four points: buccal, palatal, mesial, and distal. The readings were statistically analyzed. RESULTS: The average mean value of vertical marginal gap at all sites for Group A with palatal vent was 158.45, for Group B with open vent was 151.84, and for Group C using precementation technique was 163.58. A statistically non-significant difference was seen for values between all sites (P > 0.05) for all groups. CONCLUSION: The average vertical marginal gap for Group B was comparatively lower compared to Groups A and C.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10485502
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104855022023-09-09 A Comparative Evaluation of Vertical Marginal Gap for Vented and Precemented Cad-Cam Zirconium Copings on Angulated Abutments: An In vitro Study Passanha, Divya N. Sankeshwari, Banashree Pattanshetti, Channaveer Dhole, Rohit Miyyapuram, Sonica Zawar, Yash J Pharm Bioallied Sci Original Article OBJECTIVE: To evaluate vertical marginal gap after cementation of Zr (zirconium) copings with palatal vent, open vent, and precementation technique on angulated abutments resulting from cement entrapment between intaglio surface of copings and angulated abutments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four angled abutments and 24 CAD-CAM Zr copings were assigned to three groups depending on the type of cementation technique, comprising eight copings with palatal vent, open vent, and no vent, respectively. Vertical marginal gaps between abutment shoulder and coping margin were evaluated at four points: buccal, palatal, mesial, and distal. The readings were statistically analyzed. RESULTS: The average mean value of vertical marginal gap at all sites for Group A with palatal vent was 158.45, for Group B with open vent was 151.84, and for Group C using precementation technique was 163.58. A statistically non-significant difference was seen for values between all sites (P > 0.05) for all groups. CONCLUSION: The average vertical marginal gap for Group B was comparatively lower compared to Groups A and C. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023-07 2023-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10485502/ /pubmed/37693993 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_283_23 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Passanha, Divya N.
Sankeshwari, Banashree
Pattanshetti, Channaveer
Dhole, Rohit
Miyyapuram, Sonica
Zawar, Yash
A Comparative Evaluation of Vertical Marginal Gap for Vented and Precemented Cad-Cam Zirconium Copings on Angulated Abutments: An In vitro Study
title A Comparative Evaluation of Vertical Marginal Gap for Vented and Precemented Cad-Cam Zirconium Copings on Angulated Abutments: An In vitro Study
title_full A Comparative Evaluation of Vertical Marginal Gap for Vented and Precemented Cad-Cam Zirconium Copings on Angulated Abutments: An In vitro Study
title_fullStr A Comparative Evaluation of Vertical Marginal Gap for Vented and Precemented Cad-Cam Zirconium Copings on Angulated Abutments: An In vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Evaluation of Vertical Marginal Gap for Vented and Precemented Cad-Cam Zirconium Copings on Angulated Abutments: An In vitro Study
title_short A Comparative Evaluation of Vertical Marginal Gap for Vented and Precemented Cad-Cam Zirconium Copings on Angulated Abutments: An In vitro Study
title_sort comparative evaluation of vertical marginal gap for vented and precemented cad-cam zirconium copings on angulated abutments: an in vitro study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10485502/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37693993
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_283_23
work_keys_str_mv AT passanhadivyan acomparativeevaluationofverticalmarginalgapforventedandprecementedcadcamzirconiumcopingsonangulatedabutmentsaninvitrostudy
AT sankeshwaribanashree acomparativeevaluationofverticalmarginalgapforventedandprecementedcadcamzirconiumcopingsonangulatedabutmentsaninvitrostudy
AT pattanshettichannaveer acomparativeevaluationofverticalmarginalgapforventedandprecementedcadcamzirconiumcopingsonangulatedabutmentsaninvitrostudy
AT dholerohit acomparativeevaluationofverticalmarginalgapforventedandprecementedcadcamzirconiumcopingsonangulatedabutmentsaninvitrostudy
AT miyyapuramsonica acomparativeevaluationofverticalmarginalgapforventedandprecementedcadcamzirconiumcopingsonangulatedabutmentsaninvitrostudy
AT zawaryash acomparativeevaluationofverticalmarginalgapforventedandprecementedcadcamzirconiumcopingsonangulatedabutmentsaninvitrostudy
AT passanhadivyan comparativeevaluationofverticalmarginalgapforventedandprecementedcadcamzirconiumcopingsonangulatedabutmentsaninvitrostudy
AT sankeshwaribanashree comparativeevaluationofverticalmarginalgapforventedandprecementedcadcamzirconiumcopingsonangulatedabutmentsaninvitrostudy
AT pattanshettichannaveer comparativeevaluationofverticalmarginalgapforventedandprecementedcadcamzirconiumcopingsonangulatedabutmentsaninvitrostudy
AT dholerohit comparativeevaluationofverticalmarginalgapforventedandprecementedcadcamzirconiumcopingsonangulatedabutmentsaninvitrostudy
AT miyyapuramsonica comparativeevaluationofverticalmarginalgapforventedandprecementedcadcamzirconiumcopingsonangulatedabutmentsaninvitrostudy
AT zawaryash comparativeevaluationofverticalmarginalgapforventedandprecementedcadcamzirconiumcopingsonangulatedabutmentsaninvitrostudy