Cargando…

Compressive Strength Evaluation of Three Distinct Implant Design Approaches

OBJECTIVES: The study was done to assess the implant–abutment interface static compressive. strength of three design types and implant–abutment connection failure style. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The implants at 306 with respect to the y-axis were aligned using a stainless steel holding device. Twenty...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sahoo, Pradyumna K., Priyadarshini, Smita R., Das, Abhaya C., Panda, Saurav, Choudhury, Purobi, Swain, Pragyan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10485516/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37694095
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_193_23
_version_ 1785102804733394944
author Sahoo, Pradyumna K.
Priyadarshini, Smita R.
Das, Abhaya C.
Panda, Saurav
Choudhury, Purobi
Swain, Pragyan
author_facet Sahoo, Pradyumna K.
Priyadarshini, Smita R.
Das, Abhaya C.
Panda, Saurav
Choudhury, Purobi
Swain, Pragyan
author_sort Sahoo, Pradyumna K.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The study was done to assess the implant–abutment interface static compressive. strength of three design types and implant–abutment connection failure style. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The implants at 306 with respect to the y-axis were aligned using a stainless steel holding device. Twenty specimens from each system totaled 60 total. A unidirectional vertical piston in a computer-controlled universal testing machine (MTS 810) generated static compression loading until failure. Specimens were macroscopically examined for fracture of the screw and implant, abutment looseness, and longitudinal displacement. Analysis of variance was used to analyze the data (ANOVA). RESULT: The screw-vent system had a mean compressive strength of 335.6 22.7 psi for the Unipost system, 384.3 37.1 psi for the screw-vent system, and 245.3 25.4 psi for the ITI-1 piece abutment connection. CONCLUSION: The connection between the Unipost implant and abutment showed a statistically significant variation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10485516
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104855162023-09-09 Compressive Strength Evaluation of Three Distinct Implant Design Approaches Sahoo, Pradyumna K. Priyadarshini, Smita R. Das, Abhaya C. Panda, Saurav Choudhury, Purobi Swain, Pragyan J Pharm Bioallied Sci Original Article OBJECTIVES: The study was done to assess the implant–abutment interface static compressive. strength of three design types and implant–abutment connection failure style. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The implants at 306 with respect to the y-axis were aligned using a stainless steel holding device. Twenty specimens from each system totaled 60 total. A unidirectional vertical piston in a computer-controlled universal testing machine (MTS 810) generated static compression loading until failure. Specimens were macroscopically examined for fracture of the screw and implant, abutment looseness, and longitudinal displacement. Analysis of variance was used to analyze the data (ANOVA). RESULT: The screw-vent system had a mean compressive strength of 335.6 22.7 psi for the Unipost system, 384.3 37.1 psi for the screw-vent system, and 245.3 25.4 psi for the ITI-1 piece abutment connection. CONCLUSION: The connection between the Unipost implant and abutment showed a statistically significant variation. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023-07 2023-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10485516/ /pubmed/37694095 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_193_23 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sahoo, Pradyumna K.
Priyadarshini, Smita R.
Das, Abhaya C.
Panda, Saurav
Choudhury, Purobi
Swain, Pragyan
Compressive Strength Evaluation of Three Distinct Implant Design Approaches
title Compressive Strength Evaluation of Three Distinct Implant Design Approaches
title_full Compressive Strength Evaluation of Three Distinct Implant Design Approaches
title_fullStr Compressive Strength Evaluation of Three Distinct Implant Design Approaches
title_full_unstemmed Compressive Strength Evaluation of Three Distinct Implant Design Approaches
title_short Compressive Strength Evaluation of Three Distinct Implant Design Approaches
title_sort compressive strength evaluation of three distinct implant design approaches
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10485516/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37694095
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_193_23
work_keys_str_mv AT sahoopradyumnak compressivestrengthevaluationofthreedistinctimplantdesignapproaches
AT priyadarshinismitar compressivestrengthevaluationofthreedistinctimplantdesignapproaches
AT dasabhayac compressivestrengthevaluationofthreedistinctimplantdesignapproaches
AT pandasaurav compressivestrengthevaluationofthreedistinctimplantdesignapproaches
AT choudhurypurobi compressivestrengthevaluationofthreedistinctimplantdesignapproaches
AT swainpragyan compressivestrengthevaluationofthreedistinctimplantdesignapproaches