Cargando…
Compressive Strength Evaluation of Three Distinct Implant Design Approaches
OBJECTIVES: The study was done to assess the implant–abutment interface static compressive. strength of three design types and implant–abutment connection failure style. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The implants at 306 with respect to the y-axis were aligned using a stainless steel holding device. Twenty...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10485516/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37694095 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_193_23 |
_version_ | 1785102804733394944 |
---|---|
author | Sahoo, Pradyumna K. Priyadarshini, Smita R. Das, Abhaya C. Panda, Saurav Choudhury, Purobi Swain, Pragyan |
author_facet | Sahoo, Pradyumna K. Priyadarshini, Smita R. Das, Abhaya C. Panda, Saurav Choudhury, Purobi Swain, Pragyan |
author_sort | Sahoo, Pradyumna K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The study was done to assess the implant–abutment interface static compressive. strength of three design types and implant–abutment connection failure style. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The implants at 306 with respect to the y-axis were aligned using a stainless steel holding device. Twenty specimens from each system totaled 60 total. A unidirectional vertical piston in a computer-controlled universal testing machine (MTS 810) generated static compression loading until failure. Specimens were macroscopically examined for fracture of the screw and implant, abutment looseness, and longitudinal displacement. Analysis of variance was used to analyze the data (ANOVA). RESULT: The screw-vent system had a mean compressive strength of 335.6 22.7 psi for the Unipost system, 384.3 37.1 psi for the screw-vent system, and 245.3 25.4 psi for the ITI-1 piece abutment connection. CONCLUSION: The connection between the Unipost implant and abutment showed a statistically significant variation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10485516 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104855162023-09-09 Compressive Strength Evaluation of Three Distinct Implant Design Approaches Sahoo, Pradyumna K. Priyadarshini, Smita R. Das, Abhaya C. Panda, Saurav Choudhury, Purobi Swain, Pragyan J Pharm Bioallied Sci Original Article OBJECTIVES: The study was done to assess the implant–abutment interface static compressive. strength of three design types and implant–abutment connection failure style. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The implants at 306 with respect to the y-axis were aligned using a stainless steel holding device. Twenty specimens from each system totaled 60 total. A unidirectional vertical piston in a computer-controlled universal testing machine (MTS 810) generated static compression loading until failure. Specimens were macroscopically examined for fracture of the screw and implant, abutment looseness, and longitudinal displacement. Analysis of variance was used to analyze the data (ANOVA). RESULT: The screw-vent system had a mean compressive strength of 335.6 22.7 psi for the Unipost system, 384.3 37.1 psi for the screw-vent system, and 245.3 25.4 psi for the ITI-1 piece abutment connection. CONCLUSION: The connection between the Unipost implant and abutment showed a statistically significant variation. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023-07 2023-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10485516/ /pubmed/37694095 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_193_23 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Sahoo, Pradyumna K. Priyadarshini, Smita R. Das, Abhaya C. Panda, Saurav Choudhury, Purobi Swain, Pragyan Compressive Strength Evaluation of Three Distinct Implant Design Approaches |
title | Compressive Strength Evaluation of Three Distinct Implant Design Approaches |
title_full | Compressive Strength Evaluation of Three Distinct Implant Design Approaches |
title_fullStr | Compressive Strength Evaluation of Three Distinct Implant Design Approaches |
title_full_unstemmed | Compressive Strength Evaluation of Three Distinct Implant Design Approaches |
title_short | Compressive Strength Evaluation of Three Distinct Implant Design Approaches |
title_sort | compressive strength evaluation of three distinct implant design approaches |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10485516/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37694095 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_193_23 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sahoopradyumnak compressivestrengthevaluationofthreedistinctimplantdesignapproaches AT priyadarshinismitar compressivestrengthevaluationofthreedistinctimplantdesignapproaches AT dasabhayac compressivestrengthevaluationofthreedistinctimplantdesignapproaches AT pandasaurav compressivestrengthevaluationofthreedistinctimplantdesignapproaches AT choudhurypurobi compressivestrengthevaluationofthreedistinctimplantdesignapproaches AT swainpragyan compressivestrengthevaluationofthreedistinctimplantdesignapproaches |