Cargando…

Evaluation of Different Decalcification Agents on Extracted Tooth: A Comparative Study

INTRODUCTION: The pulp is the most negatively impacted tissue during decalcification since it comprises the soft tissue components. The most effective decalcifying agent would be safest for cells and tissues while yet removing all traces of calcium. It has to get the job done quickly and have good s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Umbare, Dhiraj Kumar K., Patil, Rahul, Sabnis, Saurabh, Yadav, Renu, Satdive, Sushant B., Kandalkar, Sachin S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10485543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37694000
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_191_23
_version_ 1785102811234566144
author Umbare, Dhiraj Kumar K.
Patil, Rahul
Sabnis, Saurabh
Yadav, Renu
Satdive, Sushant B.
Kandalkar, Sachin S.
author_facet Umbare, Dhiraj Kumar K.
Patil, Rahul
Sabnis, Saurabh
Yadav, Renu
Satdive, Sushant B.
Kandalkar, Sachin S.
author_sort Umbare, Dhiraj Kumar K.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The pulp is the most negatively impacted tissue during decalcification since it comprises the soft tissue components. The most effective decalcifying agent would be safest for cells and tissues while yet removing all traces of calcium. It has to get the job done quickly and have good staining properties. AIM AND OBJECTIVE: The goal of this research was to identify the most effective decalcifying agent for diagnostic purposes via a qualitative investigation of tissue preservation and a comparison of the efficiency of several decalcifying agents on human permanent teeth, covering both hard and soft tissue components. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty premolars from people aged 14 to 30 who needed them pulled for orthodontics were included in the research. Participants in the research were divided into five groups of ten. Group A, Group B, Group C, Group D, and Group E make up the total of five groups. In this investigation, we compared the efficiency of five decalcifying chemicals and analyzed their staining patterns and effects on tooth tissue. Fifty premolar teeth from participants aged 14–30 years old were removed for orthodontic therapy. For the research, they were split up into five groups of ten. Group A contains 5% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), Group B contains 10% formic acid, Group C contains 5% Trichoraticectic acid, Group D contains 5% nitric acid, and Group E contains 5% formalin-nitric acid. RESULT: Regardless of the specifics of the chosen decalcification solution, all procedures benefit from the inclusion of external stimuli. None of the variables were used in the current investigation; it was conducted only to compare various decalcifying chemicals. CONCLUSION: When time is not a concern, neutral EDTA may be recommended for preservation and presentation because of its ability to maintain soft-tissue integrity and provide high-quality staining. The formalin-nitric acid solution was one agent that appeared to strike a good compromise between speed and tissue preservation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10485543
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104855432023-09-09 Evaluation of Different Decalcification Agents on Extracted Tooth: A Comparative Study Umbare, Dhiraj Kumar K. Patil, Rahul Sabnis, Saurabh Yadav, Renu Satdive, Sushant B. Kandalkar, Sachin S. J Pharm Bioallied Sci Original Article INTRODUCTION: The pulp is the most negatively impacted tissue during decalcification since it comprises the soft tissue components. The most effective decalcifying agent would be safest for cells and tissues while yet removing all traces of calcium. It has to get the job done quickly and have good staining properties. AIM AND OBJECTIVE: The goal of this research was to identify the most effective decalcifying agent for diagnostic purposes via a qualitative investigation of tissue preservation and a comparison of the efficiency of several decalcifying agents on human permanent teeth, covering both hard and soft tissue components. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty premolars from people aged 14 to 30 who needed them pulled for orthodontics were included in the research. Participants in the research were divided into five groups of ten. Group A, Group B, Group C, Group D, and Group E make up the total of five groups. In this investigation, we compared the efficiency of five decalcifying chemicals and analyzed their staining patterns and effects on tooth tissue. Fifty premolar teeth from participants aged 14–30 years old were removed for orthodontic therapy. For the research, they were split up into five groups of ten. Group A contains 5% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), Group B contains 10% formic acid, Group C contains 5% Trichoraticectic acid, Group D contains 5% nitric acid, and Group E contains 5% formalin-nitric acid. RESULT: Regardless of the specifics of the chosen decalcification solution, all procedures benefit from the inclusion of external stimuli. None of the variables were used in the current investigation; it was conducted only to compare various decalcifying chemicals. CONCLUSION: When time is not a concern, neutral EDTA may be recommended for preservation and presentation because of its ability to maintain soft-tissue integrity and provide high-quality staining. The formalin-nitric acid solution was one agent that appeared to strike a good compromise between speed and tissue preservation. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023-07 2023-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10485543/ /pubmed/37694000 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_191_23 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Umbare, Dhiraj Kumar K.
Patil, Rahul
Sabnis, Saurabh
Yadav, Renu
Satdive, Sushant B.
Kandalkar, Sachin S.
Evaluation of Different Decalcification Agents on Extracted Tooth: A Comparative Study
title Evaluation of Different Decalcification Agents on Extracted Tooth: A Comparative Study
title_full Evaluation of Different Decalcification Agents on Extracted Tooth: A Comparative Study
title_fullStr Evaluation of Different Decalcification Agents on Extracted Tooth: A Comparative Study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Different Decalcification Agents on Extracted Tooth: A Comparative Study
title_short Evaluation of Different Decalcification Agents on Extracted Tooth: A Comparative Study
title_sort evaluation of different decalcification agents on extracted tooth: a comparative study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10485543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37694000
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_191_23
work_keys_str_mv AT umbaredhirajkumark evaluationofdifferentdecalcificationagentsonextractedtoothacomparativestudy
AT patilrahul evaluationofdifferentdecalcificationagentsonextractedtoothacomparativestudy
AT sabnissaurabh evaluationofdifferentdecalcificationagentsonextractedtoothacomparativestudy
AT yadavrenu evaluationofdifferentdecalcificationagentsonextractedtoothacomparativestudy
AT satdivesushantb evaluationofdifferentdecalcificationagentsonextractedtoothacomparativestudy
AT kandalkarsachins evaluationofdifferentdecalcificationagentsonextractedtoothacomparativestudy