Cargando…
Evaluation of Different Decalcification Agents on Extracted Tooth: A Comparative Study
INTRODUCTION: The pulp is the most negatively impacted tissue during decalcification since it comprises the soft tissue components. The most effective decalcifying agent would be safest for cells and tissues while yet removing all traces of calcium. It has to get the job done quickly and have good s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10485543/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37694000 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_191_23 |
_version_ | 1785102811234566144 |
---|---|
author | Umbare, Dhiraj Kumar K. Patil, Rahul Sabnis, Saurabh Yadav, Renu Satdive, Sushant B. Kandalkar, Sachin S. |
author_facet | Umbare, Dhiraj Kumar K. Patil, Rahul Sabnis, Saurabh Yadav, Renu Satdive, Sushant B. Kandalkar, Sachin S. |
author_sort | Umbare, Dhiraj Kumar K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The pulp is the most negatively impacted tissue during decalcification since it comprises the soft tissue components. The most effective decalcifying agent would be safest for cells and tissues while yet removing all traces of calcium. It has to get the job done quickly and have good staining properties. AIM AND OBJECTIVE: The goal of this research was to identify the most effective decalcifying agent for diagnostic purposes via a qualitative investigation of tissue preservation and a comparison of the efficiency of several decalcifying agents on human permanent teeth, covering both hard and soft tissue components. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty premolars from people aged 14 to 30 who needed them pulled for orthodontics were included in the research. Participants in the research were divided into five groups of ten. Group A, Group B, Group C, Group D, and Group E make up the total of five groups. In this investigation, we compared the efficiency of five decalcifying chemicals and analyzed their staining patterns and effects on tooth tissue. Fifty premolar teeth from participants aged 14–30 years old were removed for orthodontic therapy. For the research, they were split up into five groups of ten. Group A contains 5% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), Group B contains 10% formic acid, Group C contains 5% Trichoraticectic acid, Group D contains 5% nitric acid, and Group E contains 5% formalin-nitric acid. RESULT: Regardless of the specifics of the chosen decalcification solution, all procedures benefit from the inclusion of external stimuli. None of the variables were used in the current investigation; it was conducted only to compare various decalcifying chemicals. CONCLUSION: When time is not a concern, neutral EDTA may be recommended for preservation and presentation because of its ability to maintain soft-tissue integrity and provide high-quality staining. The formalin-nitric acid solution was one agent that appeared to strike a good compromise between speed and tissue preservation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10485543 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104855432023-09-09 Evaluation of Different Decalcification Agents on Extracted Tooth: A Comparative Study Umbare, Dhiraj Kumar K. Patil, Rahul Sabnis, Saurabh Yadav, Renu Satdive, Sushant B. Kandalkar, Sachin S. J Pharm Bioallied Sci Original Article INTRODUCTION: The pulp is the most negatively impacted tissue during decalcification since it comprises the soft tissue components. The most effective decalcifying agent would be safest for cells and tissues while yet removing all traces of calcium. It has to get the job done quickly and have good staining properties. AIM AND OBJECTIVE: The goal of this research was to identify the most effective decalcifying agent for diagnostic purposes via a qualitative investigation of tissue preservation and a comparison of the efficiency of several decalcifying agents on human permanent teeth, covering both hard and soft tissue components. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty premolars from people aged 14 to 30 who needed them pulled for orthodontics were included in the research. Participants in the research were divided into five groups of ten. Group A, Group B, Group C, Group D, and Group E make up the total of five groups. In this investigation, we compared the efficiency of five decalcifying chemicals and analyzed their staining patterns and effects on tooth tissue. Fifty premolar teeth from participants aged 14–30 years old were removed for orthodontic therapy. For the research, they were split up into five groups of ten. Group A contains 5% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), Group B contains 10% formic acid, Group C contains 5% Trichoraticectic acid, Group D contains 5% nitric acid, and Group E contains 5% formalin-nitric acid. RESULT: Regardless of the specifics of the chosen decalcification solution, all procedures benefit from the inclusion of external stimuli. None of the variables were used in the current investigation; it was conducted only to compare various decalcifying chemicals. CONCLUSION: When time is not a concern, neutral EDTA may be recommended for preservation and presentation because of its ability to maintain soft-tissue integrity and provide high-quality staining. The formalin-nitric acid solution was one agent that appeared to strike a good compromise between speed and tissue preservation. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023-07 2023-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10485543/ /pubmed/37694000 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_191_23 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Umbare, Dhiraj Kumar K. Patil, Rahul Sabnis, Saurabh Yadav, Renu Satdive, Sushant B. Kandalkar, Sachin S. Evaluation of Different Decalcification Agents on Extracted Tooth: A Comparative Study |
title | Evaluation of Different Decalcification Agents on Extracted Tooth: A Comparative Study |
title_full | Evaluation of Different Decalcification Agents on Extracted Tooth: A Comparative Study |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Different Decalcification Agents on Extracted Tooth: A Comparative Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Different Decalcification Agents on Extracted Tooth: A Comparative Study |
title_short | Evaluation of Different Decalcification Agents on Extracted Tooth: A Comparative Study |
title_sort | evaluation of different decalcification agents on extracted tooth: a comparative study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10485543/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37694000 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_191_23 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT umbaredhirajkumark evaluationofdifferentdecalcificationagentsonextractedtoothacomparativestudy AT patilrahul evaluationofdifferentdecalcificationagentsonextractedtoothacomparativestudy AT sabnissaurabh evaluationofdifferentdecalcificationagentsonextractedtoothacomparativestudy AT yadavrenu evaluationofdifferentdecalcificationagentsonextractedtoothacomparativestudy AT satdivesushantb evaluationofdifferentdecalcificationagentsonextractedtoothacomparativestudy AT kandalkarsachins evaluationofdifferentdecalcificationagentsonextractedtoothacomparativestudy |