Cephalometric Assessment of Differences in Soft Tissue and Dental Compensation in Skeletal Class II Div 1 Malocclusion

BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to evaluate the differences in soft tissue as well as dental compensation in skeletal Class II div 1 malocclusion. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The study sample consists of pre-treatment lateral cephalograms of 100 subjects of both gender having skeletal Class II and d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sonone, Truppti P., Mahajan, Nikhil, Pol, Tejas, Kaur, Sukhpreet, Singh, Aashna, Jha, Satyendra K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023
Materias:
Original Article
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10485552/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37693964
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_228_23
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to evaluate the differences in soft tissue as well as dental compensation in skeletal Class II div 1 malocclusion. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The study sample consists of pre-treatment lateral cephalograms of 100 subjects of both gender having skeletal Class II and dental Class II div 1 malocclusion visiting the Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Bharati Vidyapeeth Dental College, and Hospital Navi Mumbai. Cephalograms of the subjects fulfilling the inclusion criteria were included in this study. RESULTS: This research was conducted to assess dental and soft tissue compensation in skeletal Class II div 1 malocclusion and comparative assessment of lip prominence measured from two soft tissue vertical reference lines. The 100 subjects selected randomly out of which 44 men and 56 women, age ranging from 18 to 35 years. CONCLUSION: ARNETT’S method and PROFFIT’S method showed statistically significant as P < 0.0001. PROFFIT’S method and LEGAN-BURSTONE’S method showed statistically significant as P < 0.0001.

Ejemplares similares