Cargando…

Comparative Assessment of Bracket Bond Failure Rates of a Novel Chitosan-Based Orthodontic Primer: An In Vivo Split-Mouth Study

Introduction An unavoidable side effect of orthodontic fixed appliance therapy is the demineralization of the enamel surface surrounding the bracket at the adhesive and tooth interface due to a microgap formation, which serves as a nidus for biofilm growth. Due to this, it is advantageous to include...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Katyal, Deepika, Jain, Ravindra Kumar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10485561/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37692639
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.43177
_version_ 1785102815620759552
author Katyal, Deepika
Jain, Ravindra Kumar
author_facet Katyal, Deepika
Jain, Ravindra Kumar
author_sort Katyal, Deepika
collection PubMed
description Introduction An unavoidable side effect of orthodontic fixed appliance therapy is the demineralization of the enamel surface surrounding the bracket at the adhesive and tooth interface due to a microgap formation, which serves as a nidus for biofilm growth. Due to this, it is advantageous to include antibacterial agents in orthodontic primers without affecting their clinical properties. The aim of this study was to compare the in vivo bracket bond failure rates of a novel chitosan-based primer with a conventional orthodontic primer. Materials and methods Fifty-four subjects and 1,080 brackets were included in this study. At the end of six months, 45 subjects and 960 brackets bonded using novel chitosan-based primers and conventional primers (Anabond, Anabond Stedman Pharma Research Pvt Ltd, Chennai, India). Each was evaluated for a bracketed bond failure rate. Descriptive statistics and Chi-square tests were used for statistical analysis. Results The results revealed that the bracket bond failure rate in Group 1 (novel chitosan-based primer) was 27 brackets (3%) and 23 brackets in Group 2 (conventional primer) (2.5%), with no statistically significant difference between the two groups (p>0.05). There was a statistically significant difference in the bracket failure rate between the maxillary arch (2%) and the mandibular arch (3.5%) (p<0.05). Conclusion Brackets bonded with the chitosan-modified novel orthodontic primer showed no statistically significant difference in bracket bond failure rate when compared to the conventional primer. Bond failure rates were higher in the mandibular teeth when compared to the maxillary teeth.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10485561
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104855612023-09-09 Comparative Assessment of Bracket Bond Failure Rates of a Novel Chitosan-Based Orthodontic Primer: An In Vivo Split-Mouth Study Katyal, Deepika Jain, Ravindra Kumar Cureus Dentistry Introduction An unavoidable side effect of orthodontic fixed appliance therapy is the demineralization of the enamel surface surrounding the bracket at the adhesive and tooth interface due to a microgap formation, which serves as a nidus for biofilm growth. Due to this, it is advantageous to include antibacterial agents in orthodontic primers without affecting their clinical properties. The aim of this study was to compare the in vivo bracket bond failure rates of a novel chitosan-based primer with a conventional orthodontic primer. Materials and methods Fifty-four subjects and 1,080 brackets were included in this study. At the end of six months, 45 subjects and 960 brackets bonded using novel chitosan-based primers and conventional primers (Anabond, Anabond Stedman Pharma Research Pvt Ltd, Chennai, India). Each was evaluated for a bracketed bond failure rate. Descriptive statistics and Chi-square tests were used for statistical analysis. Results The results revealed that the bracket bond failure rate in Group 1 (novel chitosan-based primer) was 27 brackets (3%) and 23 brackets in Group 2 (conventional primer) (2.5%), with no statistically significant difference between the two groups (p>0.05). There was a statistically significant difference in the bracket failure rate between the maxillary arch (2%) and the mandibular arch (3.5%) (p<0.05). Conclusion Brackets bonded with the chitosan-modified novel orthodontic primer showed no statistically significant difference in bracket bond failure rate when compared to the conventional primer. Bond failure rates were higher in the mandibular teeth when compared to the maxillary teeth. Cureus 2023-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10485561/ /pubmed/37692639 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.43177 Text en Copyright © 2023, Katyal et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Dentistry
Katyal, Deepika
Jain, Ravindra Kumar
Comparative Assessment of Bracket Bond Failure Rates of a Novel Chitosan-Based Orthodontic Primer: An In Vivo Split-Mouth Study
title Comparative Assessment of Bracket Bond Failure Rates of a Novel Chitosan-Based Orthodontic Primer: An In Vivo Split-Mouth Study
title_full Comparative Assessment of Bracket Bond Failure Rates of a Novel Chitosan-Based Orthodontic Primer: An In Vivo Split-Mouth Study
title_fullStr Comparative Assessment of Bracket Bond Failure Rates of a Novel Chitosan-Based Orthodontic Primer: An In Vivo Split-Mouth Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Assessment of Bracket Bond Failure Rates of a Novel Chitosan-Based Orthodontic Primer: An In Vivo Split-Mouth Study
title_short Comparative Assessment of Bracket Bond Failure Rates of a Novel Chitosan-Based Orthodontic Primer: An In Vivo Split-Mouth Study
title_sort comparative assessment of bracket bond failure rates of a novel chitosan-based orthodontic primer: an in vivo split-mouth study
topic Dentistry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10485561/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37692639
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.43177
work_keys_str_mv AT katyaldeepika comparativeassessmentofbracketbondfailureratesofanovelchitosanbasedorthodonticprimeraninvivosplitmouthstudy
AT jainravindrakumar comparativeassessmentofbracketbondfailureratesofanovelchitosanbasedorthodonticprimeraninvivosplitmouthstudy