Cargando…

Prophylactic alpha blockers fail to prevent postoperative urinary retention following orthopaedic procedures: evidence from a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of comparative studies

Objective: The present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to estimate the prophylactic effect of alpha blockers against postoperative urinary retention (POUR) in orthopaedic patients. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases were searched between 1 January 1990 a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shan, Lianliang, Sun, Ping, Zhang, Wenping, Zheng, Xuelian, Li, Hua, Wang, Songling
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10485607/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37693901
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2023.1214349
_version_ 1785102823868858368
author Shan, Lianliang
Sun, Ping
Zhang, Wenping
Zheng, Xuelian
Li, Hua
Wang, Songling
author_facet Shan, Lianliang
Sun, Ping
Zhang, Wenping
Zheng, Xuelian
Li, Hua
Wang, Songling
author_sort Shan, Lianliang
collection PubMed
description Objective: The present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to estimate the prophylactic effect of alpha blockers against postoperative urinary retention (POUR) in orthopaedic patients. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases were searched between 1 January 1990 and 1 March 2023. The studies reporting the preventive efficacy of alpha blockers on POUR after orthopaedic procedures were identified. The pooled rates of POUR in the Intervention group (patients receiving alpha blockers) and the Control group (patients not receiving alpha blockers) were estimated and compared. The risk ratios (RRs) were calculated using the random-effects model. Subgroup analysis was performed based on surgical type. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was conducted to confirm the robustness of pooled results. Results: Seven studies containing 1,607 patients were identified. The rates of POUR were similar between the two groups (Intervention group: 126/748 [16.8%] VS. Control group: 168/859 [19.6%]; RR = 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.51 to 1.09; p = 0.130; Heterogeneity: I(2) = 67.1%; p = 0.006). No significant difference in the incidence of POUR was observed in either the Arthroplasty subgroup or Spine surgery subgroup. The result of TSA suggested that the total sample size of the existing evidence might be insufficient to draw conclusive results. Administrating alpha blockers was associated with a higher risk of complications (88/651 [13.5%] VS. 56/766 [7.3%]; RR = 1.73; 95% CI 1.27 to 2.37; p = 0.0005; Heterogeneity: I(2) = 0%; p = 0.69). Conclusion: Prophylactic alpha blockers do not reduce the risk of POUR in orthopaedic procedures, and administrating these drugs was associated with a higher risk of complications. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=409388.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10485607
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104856072023-09-09 Prophylactic alpha blockers fail to prevent postoperative urinary retention following orthopaedic procedures: evidence from a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of comparative studies Shan, Lianliang Sun, Ping Zhang, Wenping Zheng, Xuelian Li, Hua Wang, Songling Front Pharmacol Pharmacology Objective: The present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to estimate the prophylactic effect of alpha blockers against postoperative urinary retention (POUR) in orthopaedic patients. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases were searched between 1 January 1990 and 1 March 2023. The studies reporting the preventive efficacy of alpha blockers on POUR after orthopaedic procedures were identified. The pooled rates of POUR in the Intervention group (patients receiving alpha blockers) and the Control group (patients not receiving alpha blockers) were estimated and compared. The risk ratios (RRs) were calculated using the random-effects model. Subgroup analysis was performed based on surgical type. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was conducted to confirm the robustness of pooled results. Results: Seven studies containing 1,607 patients were identified. The rates of POUR were similar between the two groups (Intervention group: 126/748 [16.8%] VS. Control group: 168/859 [19.6%]; RR = 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.51 to 1.09; p = 0.130; Heterogeneity: I(2) = 67.1%; p = 0.006). No significant difference in the incidence of POUR was observed in either the Arthroplasty subgroup or Spine surgery subgroup. The result of TSA suggested that the total sample size of the existing evidence might be insufficient to draw conclusive results. Administrating alpha blockers was associated with a higher risk of complications (88/651 [13.5%] VS. 56/766 [7.3%]; RR = 1.73; 95% CI 1.27 to 2.37; p = 0.0005; Heterogeneity: I(2) = 0%; p = 0.69). Conclusion: Prophylactic alpha blockers do not reduce the risk of POUR in orthopaedic procedures, and administrating these drugs was associated with a higher risk of complications. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=409388. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10485607/ /pubmed/37693901 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2023.1214349 Text en Copyright © 2023 Shan, Sun, Zhang, Zheng, Li and Wang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pharmacology
Shan, Lianliang
Sun, Ping
Zhang, Wenping
Zheng, Xuelian
Li, Hua
Wang, Songling
Prophylactic alpha blockers fail to prevent postoperative urinary retention following orthopaedic procedures: evidence from a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of comparative studies
title Prophylactic alpha blockers fail to prevent postoperative urinary retention following orthopaedic procedures: evidence from a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of comparative studies
title_full Prophylactic alpha blockers fail to prevent postoperative urinary retention following orthopaedic procedures: evidence from a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of comparative studies
title_fullStr Prophylactic alpha blockers fail to prevent postoperative urinary retention following orthopaedic procedures: evidence from a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of comparative studies
title_full_unstemmed Prophylactic alpha blockers fail to prevent postoperative urinary retention following orthopaedic procedures: evidence from a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of comparative studies
title_short Prophylactic alpha blockers fail to prevent postoperative urinary retention following orthopaedic procedures: evidence from a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of comparative studies
title_sort prophylactic alpha blockers fail to prevent postoperative urinary retention following orthopaedic procedures: evidence from a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of comparative studies
topic Pharmacology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10485607/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37693901
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2023.1214349
work_keys_str_mv AT shanlianliang prophylacticalphablockersfailtopreventpostoperativeurinaryretentionfollowingorthopaedicproceduresevidencefromametaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysisofcomparativestudies
AT sunping prophylacticalphablockersfailtopreventpostoperativeurinaryretentionfollowingorthopaedicproceduresevidencefromametaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysisofcomparativestudies
AT zhangwenping prophylacticalphablockersfailtopreventpostoperativeurinaryretentionfollowingorthopaedicproceduresevidencefromametaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysisofcomparativestudies
AT zhengxuelian prophylacticalphablockersfailtopreventpostoperativeurinaryretentionfollowingorthopaedicproceduresevidencefromametaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysisofcomparativestudies
AT lihua prophylacticalphablockersfailtopreventpostoperativeurinaryretentionfollowingorthopaedicproceduresevidencefromametaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysisofcomparativestudies
AT wangsongling prophylacticalphablockersfailtopreventpostoperativeurinaryretentionfollowingorthopaedicproceduresevidencefromametaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysisofcomparativestudies