Cargando…
The persistence of SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies after COVID-19: A one-year observation. Is a SARS-CoV-2 vaccination booster dose necessary?
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to investigate the persistence of SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) one year after contracting COVID-19. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 38 patients – 34 men and 4 women – suffering from COVID-19 between March 15 and May 26, 2020. The median a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Termedia Publishing House
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10485689/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37692027 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/ceji.2023.126206 |
_version_ | 1785102843322040320 |
---|---|
author | Tworek, Adam Jaroń, Krzysztof Cicha, Małgorzata Rydzewski, Andrzej Wierzba, Waldemar Zaczyński, Artur Król, Zbigniew Rydzewska, Grażyna |
author_facet | Tworek, Adam Jaroń, Krzysztof Cicha, Małgorzata Rydzewski, Andrzej Wierzba, Waldemar Zaczyński, Artur Król, Zbigniew Rydzewska, Grażyna |
author_sort | Tworek, Adam |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to investigate the persistence of SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) one year after contracting COVID-19. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 38 patients – 34 men and 4 women – suffering from COVID-19 between March 15 and May 26, 2020. The median age in the group was 31 years, ranging from 22 to 67 years. The levels of neutralizing antibodies were measured at three time-points – baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. The primary endpoint was a post-infection positive result for NAbs (> 15 AU/ml; Liaison SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 IgG quantitative test) 12 months after infection. RESULTS: The median level of NAbs after 12 months was 26.5 AU/ml. At the end of observation (12 months), 21 of the 38 patients had a NAb level of >15 AU/ml (positive). The median antibody half-life was 5.8 months. CONCLUSIONS: A high percentage of the patients maintained positive levels of antibodies 6 and 12 months after COVID-19 infection. The dynamics of the antibody level decline suggests the need for booster vaccination at least once a year. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10485689 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Termedia Publishing House |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104856892023-09-09 The persistence of SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies after COVID-19: A one-year observation. Is a SARS-CoV-2 vaccination booster dose necessary? Tworek, Adam Jaroń, Krzysztof Cicha, Małgorzata Rydzewski, Andrzej Wierzba, Waldemar Zaczyński, Artur Król, Zbigniew Rydzewska, Grażyna Cent Eur J Immunol Clinical Immunology INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to investigate the persistence of SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) one year after contracting COVID-19. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 38 patients – 34 men and 4 women – suffering from COVID-19 between March 15 and May 26, 2020. The median age in the group was 31 years, ranging from 22 to 67 years. The levels of neutralizing antibodies were measured at three time-points – baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. The primary endpoint was a post-infection positive result for NAbs (> 15 AU/ml; Liaison SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 IgG quantitative test) 12 months after infection. RESULTS: The median level of NAbs after 12 months was 26.5 AU/ml. At the end of observation (12 months), 21 of the 38 patients had a NAb level of >15 AU/ml (positive). The median antibody half-life was 5.8 months. CONCLUSIONS: A high percentage of the patients maintained positive levels of antibodies 6 and 12 months after COVID-19 infection. The dynamics of the antibody level decline suggests the need for booster vaccination at least once a year. Termedia Publishing House 2023-03-28 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10485689/ /pubmed/37692027 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/ceji.2023.126206 Text en Copyright © 2023 Termedia https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) ) |
spellingShingle | Clinical Immunology Tworek, Adam Jaroń, Krzysztof Cicha, Małgorzata Rydzewski, Andrzej Wierzba, Waldemar Zaczyński, Artur Król, Zbigniew Rydzewska, Grażyna The persistence of SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies after COVID-19: A one-year observation. Is a SARS-CoV-2 vaccination booster dose necessary? |
title | The persistence of SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies after COVID-19: A one-year observation. Is a SARS-CoV-2 vaccination booster dose necessary? |
title_full | The persistence of SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies after COVID-19: A one-year observation. Is a SARS-CoV-2 vaccination booster dose necessary? |
title_fullStr | The persistence of SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies after COVID-19: A one-year observation. Is a SARS-CoV-2 vaccination booster dose necessary? |
title_full_unstemmed | The persistence of SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies after COVID-19: A one-year observation. Is a SARS-CoV-2 vaccination booster dose necessary? |
title_short | The persistence of SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies after COVID-19: A one-year observation. Is a SARS-CoV-2 vaccination booster dose necessary? |
title_sort | persistence of sars-cov-2 neutralizing antibodies after covid-19: a one-year observation. is a sars-cov-2 vaccination booster dose necessary? |
topic | Clinical Immunology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10485689/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37692027 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/ceji.2023.126206 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tworekadam thepersistenceofsarscov2neutralizingantibodiesaftercovid19aoneyearobservationisasarscov2vaccinationboosterdosenecessary AT jaronkrzysztof thepersistenceofsarscov2neutralizingantibodiesaftercovid19aoneyearobservationisasarscov2vaccinationboosterdosenecessary AT cichamałgorzata thepersistenceofsarscov2neutralizingantibodiesaftercovid19aoneyearobservationisasarscov2vaccinationboosterdosenecessary AT rydzewskiandrzej thepersistenceofsarscov2neutralizingantibodiesaftercovid19aoneyearobservationisasarscov2vaccinationboosterdosenecessary AT wierzbawaldemar thepersistenceofsarscov2neutralizingantibodiesaftercovid19aoneyearobservationisasarscov2vaccinationboosterdosenecessary AT zaczynskiartur thepersistenceofsarscov2neutralizingantibodiesaftercovid19aoneyearobservationisasarscov2vaccinationboosterdosenecessary AT krolzbigniew thepersistenceofsarscov2neutralizingantibodiesaftercovid19aoneyearobservationisasarscov2vaccinationboosterdosenecessary AT rydzewskagrazyna thepersistenceofsarscov2neutralizingantibodiesaftercovid19aoneyearobservationisasarscov2vaccinationboosterdosenecessary AT tworekadam persistenceofsarscov2neutralizingantibodiesaftercovid19aoneyearobservationisasarscov2vaccinationboosterdosenecessary AT jaronkrzysztof persistenceofsarscov2neutralizingantibodiesaftercovid19aoneyearobservationisasarscov2vaccinationboosterdosenecessary AT cichamałgorzata persistenceofsarscov2neutralizingantibodiesaftercovid19aoneyearobservationisasarscov2vaccinationboosterdosenecessary AT rydzewskiandrzej persistenceofsarscov2neutralizingantibodiesaftercovid19aoneyearobservationisasarscov2vaccinationboosterdosenecessary AT wierzbawaldemar persistenceofsarscov2neutralizingantibodiesaftercovid19aoneyearobservationisasarscov2vaccinationboosterdosenecessary AT zaczynskiartur persistenceofsarscov2neutralizingantibodiesaftercovid19aoneyearobservationisasarscov2vaccinationboosterdosenecessary AT krolzbigniew persistenceofsarscov2neutralizingantibodiesaftercovid19aoneyearobservationisasarscov2vaccinationboosterdosenecessary AT rydzewskagrazyna persistenceofsarscov2neutralizingantibodiesaftercovid19aoneyearobservationisasarscov2vaccinationboosterdosenecessary |