Cargando…
Is a Single Nephrographic Phase Computed Tomography Sufficient for Detecting Urothelial Carcinoma in Patients with Visible Haematuria? A Prospective Paired Noninferiority Comparison
BACKGROUND: There is uncertainty about the utility of multiphase computed tomography (CT) compared with single-phase CT in the routine examination of patients with visible haematuria (VH). OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracies of single nephrographic phase (NP) CT and four-phase CT in detecting uroth...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10485786/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37693732 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2023.06.005 |
_version_ | 1785102863740960768 |
---|---|
author | Galtung, Kristina F. Lauritzen, Peter M. Sandbæk, Gunnar Bay, Dag Ponzi, Erica Baco, Eduard Cowan, Nigel C. Naas, Anca M. Rud, Erik |
author_facet | Galtung, Kristina F. Lauritzen, Peter M. Sandbæk, Gunnar Bay, Dag Ponzi, Erica Baco, Eduard Cowan, Nigel C. Naas, Anca M. Rud, Erik |
author_sort | Galtung, Kristina F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There is uncertainty about the utility of multiphase computed tomography (CT) compared with single-phase CT in the routine examination of patients with visible haematuria (VH). OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracies of single nephrographic phase (NP) CT and four-phase CT in detecting urothelial carcinoma (UC). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a single-centre, prospective, paired, noninferiority study of patients with painless VH referred for CT before cystoscopy between September 2019 and June 2021. Patients were followed up for 1 yr to ascertain UC diagnosis. INTERVENTION: All patients underwent four-phase CT (control), from which single NP CT (experimental) was extracted. Both were independently assessed for UC. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The primary outcome was the difference in accuracy between the control and experimental CT using a 7.5% noninferiority limit. Histologically verified UC defined a positive reference standard. Secondary outcomes included differences in sensitivity, specificity, negative (NPV) and positive (PPV) predictive values, and area under the curve (AUC). All results are reported per patient. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Of the 308 patients included, UC was diagnosed in 45 (14.6%). The difference in accuracy between the control and experimental CT was 1.9% (95% confidence interval −2.8 to 6.7), demonstrating noninferiority. Sensitivity was 93.3% versus 91.1%, specificity was 83.7% versus 81.8%, NPV was 98.7% versus 98.2%, PPV was 49.4% versus 46.1%, and AUC was 0.96 versus 0.94 for the control versus experimental CT. Limitations included a low number of UC cases and no definite criteria for selecting a noninferiority limit. CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy of NP CT is not inferior to that of four-phase CT for detecting UC. PATIENT SUMMARY: This study shows that a computed tomography (CT) examination with only one contrast phase is no worse than a more complex CT examination for detecting cancer in the urinary tract among patients presenting with visible blood in the urine. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10485786 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104857862023-09-09 Is a Single Nephrographic Phase Computed Tomography Sufficient for Detecting Urothelial Carcinoma in Patients with Visible Haematuria? A Prospective Paired Noninferiority Comparison Galtung, Kristina F. Lauritzen, Peter M. Sandbæk, Gunnar Bay, Dag Ponzi, Erica Baco, Eduard Cowan, Nigel C. Naas, Anca M. Rud, Erik Eur Urol Open Sci Urothelial Cancer BACKGROUND: There is uncertainty about the utility of multiphase computed tomography (CT) compared with single-phase CT in the routine examination of patients with visible haematuria (VH). OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracies of single nephrographic phase (NP) CT and four-phase CT in detecting urothelial carcinoma (UC). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a single-centre, prospective, paired, noninferiority study of patients with painless VH referred for CT before cystoscopy between September 2019 and June 2021. Patients were followed up for 1 yr to ascertain UC diagnosis. INTERVENTION: All patients underwent four-phase CT (control), from which single NP CT (experimental) was extracted. Both were independently assessed for UC. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The primary outcome was the difference in accuracy between the control and experimental CT using a 7.5% noninferiority limit. Histologically verified UC defined a positive reference standard. Secondary outcomes included differences in sensitivity, specificity, negative (NPV) and positive (PPV) predictive values, and area under the curve (AUC). All results are reported per patient. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Of the 308 patients included, UC was diagnosed in 45 (14.6%). The difference in accuracy between the control and experimental CT was 1.9% (95% confidence interval −2.8 to 6.7), demonstrating noninferiority. Sensitivity was 93.3% versus 91.1%, specificity was 83.7% versus 81.8%, NPV was 98.7% versus 98.2%, PPV was 49.4% versus 46.1%, and AUC was 0.96 versus 0.94 for the control versus experimental CT. Limitations included a low number of UC cases and no definite criteria for selecting a noninferiority limit. CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy of NP CT is not inferior to that of four-phase CT for detecting UC. PATIENT SUMMARY: This study shows that a computed tomography (CT) examination with only one contrast phase is no worse than a more complex CT examination for detecting cancer in the urinary tract among patients presenting with visible blood in the urine. Elsevier 2023-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10485786/ /pubmed/37693732 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2023.06.005 Text en © 2023 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Urothelial Cancer Galtung, Kristina F. Lauritzen, Peter M. Sandbæk, Gunnar Bay, Dag Ponzi, Erica Baco, Eduard Cowan, Nigel C. Naas, Anca M. Rud, Erik Is a Single Nephrographic Phase Computed Tomography Sufficient for Detecting Urothelial Carcinoma in Patients with Visible Haematuria? A Prospective Paired Noninferiority Comparison |
title | Is a Single Nephrographic Phase Computed Tomography Sufficient for Detecting Urothelial Carcinoma in Patients with Visible Haematuria? A Prospective Paired Noninferiority Comparison |
title_full | Is a Single Nephrographic Phase Computed Tomography Sufficient for Detecting Urothelial Carcinoma in Patients with Visible Haematuria? A Prospective Paired Noninferiority Comparison |
title_fullStr | Is a Single Nephrographic Phase Computed Tomography Sufficient for Detecting Urothelial Carcinoma in Patients with Visible Haematuria? A Prospective Paired Noninferiority Comparison |
title_full_unstemmed | Is a Single Nephrographic Phase Computed Tomography Sufficient for Detecting Urothelial Carcinoma in Patients with Visible Haematuria? A Prospective Paired Noninferiority Comparison |
title_short | Is a Single Nephrographic Phase Computed Tomography Sufficient for Detecting Urothelial Carcinoma in Patients with Visible Haematuria? A Prospective Paired Noninferiority Comparison |
title_sort | is a single nephrographic phase computed tomography sufficient for detecting urothelial carcinoma in patients with visible haematuria? a prospective paired noninferiority comparison |
topic | Urothelial Cancer |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10485786/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37693732 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2023.06.005 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT galtungkristinaf isasinglenephrographicphasecomputedtomographysufficientfordetectingurothelialcarcinomainpatientswithvisiblehaematuriaaprospectivepairednoninferioritycomparison AT lauritzenpeterm isasinglenephrographicphasecomputedtomographysufficientfordetectingurothelialcarcinomainpatientswithvisiblehaematuriaaprospectivepairednoninferioritycomparison AT sandbækgunnar isasinglenephrographicphasecomputedtomographysufficientfordetectingurothelialcarcinomainpatientswithvisiblehaematuriaaprospectivepairednoninferioritycomparison AT baydag isasinglenephrographicphasecomputedtomographysufficientfordetectingurothelialcarcinomainpatientswithvisiblehaematuriaaprospectivepairednoninferioritycomparison AT ponzierica isasinglenephrographicphasecomputedtomographysufficientfordetectingurothelialcarcinomainpatientswithvisiblehaematuriaaprospectivepairednoninferioritycomparison AT bacoeduard isasinglenephrographicphasecomputedtomographysufficientfordetectingurothelialcarcinomainpatientswithvisiblehaematuriaaprospectivepairednoninferioritycomparison AT cowannigelc isasinglenephrographicphasecomputedtomographysufficientfordetectingurothelialcarcinomainpatientswithvisiblehaematuriaaprospectivepairednoninferioritycomparison AT naasancam isasinglenephrographicphasecomputedtomographysufficientfordetectingurothelialcarcinomainpatientswithvisiblehaematuriaaprospectivepairednoninferioritycomparison AT ruderik isasinglenephrographicphasecomputedtomographysufficientfordetectingurothelialcarcinomainpatientswithvisiblehaematuriaaprospectivepairednoninferioritycomparison |