Cargando…

Qualitative analysis of a remote monitoring intervention for managing heart failure

BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) is one of the most common reasons for hospital admission and is a major cause of morbidity, mortality, and increasing health care costs. The EMPOWER study was a randomized trial that used remote monitoring technology to track patients’ weight and diuretic adherence and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Klaiman, Tamar, Iannotte, L. G., Josephs, Michael, Russell, Louise B., Norton, Laurie, Mehta, Shivan, Troxel, Andrea, Zhu, Jingsan, Volpp, Kevin, Asch, David A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10486103/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37679712
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-023-03456-9
_version_ 1785102933309784064
author Klaiman, Tamar
Iannotte, L. G.
Josephs, Michael
Russell, Louise B.
Norton, Laurie
Mehta, Shivan
Troxel, Andrea
Zhu, Jingsan
Volpp, Kevin
Asch, David A.
author_facet Klaiman, Tamar
Iannotte, L. G.
Josephs, Michael
Russell, Louise B.
Norton, Laurie
Mehta, Shivan
Troxel, Andrea
Zhu, Jingsan
Volpp, Kevin
Asch, David A.
author_sort Klaiman, Tamar
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) is one of the most common reasons for hospital admission and is a major cause of morbidity, mortality, and increasing health care costs. The EMPOWER study was a randomized trial that used remote monitoring technology to track patients’ weight and diuretic adherence and a state-of-the-art approach derived from behavioral economics to motivate adherence to the reverse monitoring technology. OBJECTIVE: The goal was to explore patient and clinician perceptions of the program and its impact on perceived health outcomes and better understand why some patients or clinicians did better or worse than others in response to the intervention. APPROACH: This was a retrospective qualitative study utilizing semi-structured interviews with 43 patients and 16 clinicians to understand the trial’s processes, reflecting on successes and areas for improvement for future iterations of behavioral economic interventions. KEY RESULTS: Many patients felt supported, and they appreciated the intervention. Many also appreciated the lottery intervention, and while it was not an incentive for enrolling for many respondents, it may have increased adherence during the study. Clinicians felt that the intervention integrated well into their workflow, but the number of alerts was burdensome. Additionally, responses to alerts varied considerably by provider, perhaps because there are no professional guidelines for alerts unaccompanied by severe symptoms. CONCLUSION: Our qualitative analysis indicates potential areas for additional exploration and consideration to design better behavioral economic interventions to improve cardiovascular health outcomes for patients with HF. Patients appreciated lottery incentives for adhering to program requirements; however, many were too far along in their disease progression to benefit from the intervention. Clinicians found the amount and frequency of electronic alerts burdensome and felt they did not improve patient outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02708654. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12872-023-03456-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10486103
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104861032023-09-09 Qualitative analysis of a remote monitoring intervention for managing heart failure Klaiman, Tamar Iannotte, L. G. Josephs, Michael Russell, Louise B. Norton, Laurie Mehta, Shivan Troxel, Andrea Zhu, Jingsan Volpp, Kevin Asch, David A. BMC Cardiovasc Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) is one of the most common reasons for hospital admission and is a major cause of morbidity, mortality, and increasing health care costs. The EMPOWER study was a randomized trial that used remote monitoring technology to track patients’ weight and diuretic adherence and a state-of-the-art approach derived from behavioral economics to motivate adherence to the reverse monitoring technology. OBJECTIVE: The goal was to explore patient and clinician perceptions of the program and its impact on perceived health outcomes and better understand why some patients or clinicians did better or worse than others in response to the intervention. APPROACH: This was a retrospective qualitative study utilizing semi-structured interviews with 43 patients and 16 clinicians to understand the trial’s processes, reflecting on successes and areas for improvement for future iterations of behavioral economic interventions. KEY RESULTS: Many patients felt supported, and they appreciated the intervention. Many also appreciated the lottery intervention, and while it was not an incentive for enrolling for many respondents, it may have increased adherence during the study. Clinicians felt that the intervention integrated well into their workflow, but the number of alerts was burdensome. Additionally, responses to alerts varied considerably by provider, perhaps because there are no professional guidelines for alerts unaccompanied by severe symptoms. CONCLUSION: Our qualitative analysis indicates potential areas for additional exploration and consideration to design better behavioral economic interventions to improve cardiovascular health outcomes for patients with HF. Patients appreciated lottery incentives for adhering to program requirements; however, many were too far along in their disease progression to benefit from the intervention. Clinicians found the amount and frequency of electronic alerts burdensome and felt they did not improve patient outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02708654. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12872-023-03456-9. BioMed Central 2023-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10486103/ /pubmed/37679712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-023-03456-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Klaiman, Tamar
Iannotte, L. G.
Josephs, Michael
Russell, Louise B.
Norton, Laurie
Mehta, Shivan
Troxel, Andrea
Zhu, Jingsan
Volpp, Kevin
Asch, David A.
Qualitative analysis of a remote monitoring intervention for managing heart failure
title Qualitative analysis of a remote monitoring intervention for managing heart failure
title_full Qualitative analysis of a remote monitoring intervention for managing heart failure
title_fullStr Qualitative analysis of a remote monitoring intervention for managing heart failure
title_full_unstemmed Qualitative analysis of a remote monitoring intervention for managing heart failure
title_short Qualitative analysis of a remote monitoring intervention for managing heart failure
title_sort qualitative analysis of a remote monitoring intervention for managing heart failure
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10486103/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37679712
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-023-03456-9
work_keys_str_mv AT klaimantamar qualitativeanalysisofaremotemonitoringinterventionformanagingheartfailure
AT iannottelg qualitativeanalysisofaremotemonitoringinterventionformanagingheartfailure
AT josephsmichael qualitativeanalysisofaremotemonitoringinterventionformanagingheartfailure
AT russelllouiseb qualitativeanalysisofaremotemonitoringinterventionformanagingheartfailure
AT nortonlaurie qualitativeanalysisofaremotemonitoringinterventionformanagingheartfailure
AT mehtashivan qualitativeanalysisofaremotemonitoringinterventionformanagingheartfailure
AT troxelandrea qualitativeanalysisofaremotemonitoringinterventionformanagingheartfailure
AT zhujingsan qualitativeanalysisofaremotemonitoringinterventionformanagingheartfailure
AT volppkevin qualitativeanalysisofaremotemonitoringinterventionformanagingheartfailure
AT aschdavida qualitativeanalysisofaremotemonitoringinterventionformanagingheartfailure