Cargando…
Qualitative analysis of a remote monitoring intervention for managing heart failure
BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) is one of the most common reasons for hospital admission and is a major cause of morbidity, mortality, and increasing health care costs. The EMPOWER study was a randomized trial that used remote monitoring technology to track patients’ weight and diuretic adherence and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10486103/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37679712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-023-03456-9 |
_version_ | 1785102933309784064 |
---|---|
author | Klaiman, Tamar Iannotte, L. G. Josephs, Michael Russell, Louise B. Norton, Laurie Mehta, Shivan Troxel, Andrea Zhu, Jingsan Volpp, Kevin Asch, David A. |
author_facet | Klaiman, Tamar Iannotte, L. G. Josephs, Michael Russell, Louise B. Norton, Laurie Mehta, Shivan Troxel, Andrea Zhu, Jingsan Volpp, Kevin Asch, David A. |
author_sort | Klaiman, Tamar |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) is one of the most common reasons for hospital admission and is a major cause of morbidity, mortality, and increasing health care costs. The EMPOWER study was a randomized trial that used remote monitoring technology to track patients’ weight and diuretic adherence and a state-of-the-art approach derived from behavioral economics to motivate adherence to the reverse monitoring technology. OBJECTIVE: The goal was to explore patient and clinician perceptions of the program and its impact on perceived health outcomes and better understand why some patients or clinicians did better or worse than others in response to the intervention. APPROACH: This was a retrospective qualitative study utilizing semi-structured interviews with 43 patients and 16 clinicians to understand the trial’s processes, reflecting on successes and areas for improvement for future iterations of behavioral economic interventions. KEY RESULTS: Many patients felt supported, and they appreciated the intervention. Many also appreciated the lottery intervention, and while it was not an incentive for enrolling for many respondents, it may have increased adherence during the study. Clinicians felt that the intervention integrated well into their workflow, but the number of alerts was burdensome. Additionally, responses to alerts varied considerably by provider, perhaps because there are no professional guidelines for alerts unaccompanied by severe symptoms. CONCLUSION: Our qualitative analysis indicates potential areas for additional exploration and consideration to design better behavioral economic interventions to improve cardiovascular health outcomes for patients with HF. Patients appreciated lottery incentives for adhering to program requirements; however, many were too far along in their disease progression to benefit from the intervention. Clinicians found the amount and frequency of electronic alerts burdensome and felt they did not improve patient outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02708654. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12872-023-03456-9. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10486103 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104861032023-09-09 Qualitative analysis of a remote monitoring intervention for managing heart failure Klaiman, Tamar Iannotte, L. G. Josephs, Michael Russell, Louise B. Norton, Laurie Mehta, Shivan Troxel, Andrea Zhu, Jingsan Volpp, Kevin Asch, David A. BMC Cardiovasc Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) is one of the most common reasons for hospital admission and is a major cause of morbidity, mortality, and increasing health care costs. The EMPOWER study was a randomized trial that used remote monitoring technology to track patients’ weight and diuretic adherence and a state-of-the-art approach derived from behavioral economics to motivate adherence to the reverse monitoring technology. OBJECTIVE: The goal was to explore patient and clinician perceptions of the program and its impact on perceived health outcomes and better understand why some patients or clinicians did better or worse than others in response to the intervention. APPROACH: This was a retrospective qualitative study utilizing semi-structured interviews with 43 patients and 16 clinicians to understand the trial’s processes, reflecting on successes and areas for improvement for future iterations of behavioral economic interventions. KEY RESULTS: Many patients felt supported, and they appreciated the intervention. Many also appreciated the lottery intervention, and while it was not an incentive for enrolling for many respondents, it may have increased adherence during the study. Clinicians felt that the intervention integrated well into their workflow, but the number of alerts was burdensome. Additionally, responses to alerts varied considerably by provider, perhaps because there are no professional guidelines for alerts unaccompanied by severe symptoms. CONCLUSION: Our qualitative analysis indicates potential areas for additional exploration and consideration to design better behavioral economic interventions to improve cardiovascular health outcomes for patients with HF. Patients appreciated lottery incentives for adhering to program requirements; however, many were too far along in their disease progression to benefit from the intervention. Clinicians found the amount and frequency of electronic alerts burdensome and felt they did not improve patient outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02708654. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12872-023-03456-9. BioMed Central 2023-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10486103/ /pubmed/37679712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-023-03456-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Klaiman, Tamar Iannotte, L. G. Josephs, Michael Russell, Louise B. Norton, Laurie Mehta, Shivan Troxel, Andrea Zhu, Jingsan Volpp, Kevin Asch, David A. Qualitative analysis of a remote monitoring intervention for managing heart failure |
title | Qualitative analysis of a remote monitoring intervention for managing heart failure |
title_full | Qualitative analysis of a remote monitoring intervention for managing heart failure |
title_fullStr | Qualitative analysis of a remote monitoring intervention for managing heart failure |
title_full_unstemmed | Qualitative analysis of a remote monitoring intervention for managing heart failure |
title_short | Qualitative analysis of a remote monitoring intervention for managing heart failure |
title_sort | qualitative analysis of a remote monitoring intervention for managing heart failure |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10486103/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37679712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-023-03456-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT klaimantamar qualitativeanalysisofaremotemonitoringinterventionformanagingheartfailure AT iannottelg qualitativeanalysisofaremotemonitoringinterventionformanagingheartfailure AT josephsmichael qualitativeanalysisofaremotemonitoringinterventionformanagingheartfailure AT russelllouiseb qualitativeanalysisofaremotemonitoringinterventionformanagingheartfailure AT nortonlaurie qualitativeanalysisofaremotemonitoringinterventionformanagingheartfailure AT mehtashivan qualitativeanalysisofaremotemonitoringinterventionformanagingheartfailure AT troxelandrea qualitativeanalysisofaremotemonitoringinterventionformanagingheartfailure AT zhujingsan qualitativeanalysisofaremotemonitoringinterventionformanagingheartfailure AT volppkevin qualitativeanalysisofaremotemonitoringinterventionformanagingheartfailure AT aschdavida qualitativeanalysisofaremotemonitoringinterventionformanagingheartfailure |