Cargando…
Careful patient selection together with optimal implant positioning may reduce but does not eliminate the risk of elevated serum cobalt and chrome levels following metal-on-metal hip resurfacing
BACKGROUND: Elevated serum chrome (sCr) and cobalt (sCo) concentrations are associated with local tissue adverse reactions to metal debris following metal-on-metal hip resurfacing (MoM-HR). Serum metal ions <2 µg/l are probably of little clinical relevance and a pragmatic “safe” threshold <5 µ...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10486161/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36314413 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/11207000221124302 |
_version_ | 1785102946498772992 |
---|---|
author | Oxblom, Alexander Hedlund, Håkan Itayem, Raed Felländer-Tsai, Li Vidgren, Mathias Rolfson, Ola Brismar, Harald |
author_facet | Oxblom, Alexander Hedlund, Håkan Itayem, Raed Felländer-Tsai, Li Vidgren, Mathias Rolfson, Ola Brismar, Harald |
author_sort | Oxblom, Alexander |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Elevated serum chrome (sCr) and cobalt (sCo) concentrations are associated with local tissue adverse reactions to metal debris following metal-on-metal hip resurfacing (MoM-HR). Serum metal ions <2 µg/l are probably of little clinical relevance and a pragmatic “safe” threshold <5 µg/l has been suggested. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate if a careful selection of patients combined with optimal implant positioning could eliminate cases with “unsafe” serum metal ion levels. A secondary aim was to study the association between different risk factors and having Co and/or Cr levels >5 µg/l. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective, single-institution cohort study of 410 consecutive patients operated on with a Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) implant between 2001 and 2014. 288 of these had a unilateral MoM-HR, pelvic and true lateral radiographs, and a related sCo and sCr sample, and were included in the final analysis. They were allocated to either a presumed “optimal group” consisting of only men aged <60 years old, with femoral head component >48 mm diameter, and with a cup positioned within Lewinnek’s safe zones, or a “suboptimal group” consisting of the remaining patients. Fisher′s exact test and multiple logistic regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: In the optimal group 48% (47/97) had serum metal ions >2 µg/l and 8% (8/97) >5 µg/l compared to 61% (116/191) and 18% (34/191) in the suboptimal group, p = 0.059 and p = 0.034 respectively. Acetabular cups with an anteversion <5 degrees had the highest odds ratio, 6.5 (95% CI, 3.0–14.3), of having sCo and sCr concentrations exceeding 5 µg/l. CONCLUSIONS: A well oriented BHR acetabular component in a presumably “optimal” patient reduces the risk of having elevated serum metal ions but does not eliminate it. Insufficient cup anteversion seems to be the strongest associated factor of elevated serum metals. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10486161 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104861612023-09-09 Careful patient selection together with optimal implant positioning may reduce but does not eliminate the risk of elevated serum cobalt and chrome levels following metal-on-metal hip resurfacing Oxblom, Alexander Hedlund, Håkan Itayem, Raed Felländer-Tsai, Li Vidgren, Mathias Rolfson, Ola Brismar, Harald Hip Int Original Research Articles BACKGROUND: Elevated serum chrome (sCr) and cobalt (sCo) concentrations are associated with local tissue adverse reactions to metal debris following metal-on-metal hip resurfacing (MoM-HR). Serum metal ions <2 µg/l are probably of little clinical relevance and a pragmatic “safe” threshold <5 µg/l has been suggested. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate if a careful selection of patients combined with optimal implant positioning could eliminate cases with “unsafe” serum metal ion levels. A secondary aim was to study the association between different risk factors and having Co and/or Cr levels >5 µg/l. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective, single-institution cohort study of 410 consecutive patients operated on with a Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) implant between 2001 and 2014. 288 of these had a unilateral MoM-HR, pelvic and true lateral radiographs, and a related sCo and sCr sample, and were included in the final analysis. They were allocated to either a presumed “optimal group” consisting of only men aged <60 years old, with femoral head component >48 mm diameter, and with a cup positioned within Lewinnek’s safe zones, or a “suboptimal group” consisting of the remaining patients. Fisher′s exact test and multiple logistic regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: In the optimal group 48% (47/97) had serum metal ions >2 µg/l and 8% (8/97) >5 µg/l compared to 61% (116/191) and 18% (34/191) in the suboptimal group, p = 0.059 and p = 0.034 respectively. Acetabular cups with an anteversion <5 degrees had the highest odds ratio, 6.5 (95% CI, 3.0–14.3), of having sCo and sCr concentrations exceeding 5 µg/l. CONCLUSIONS: A well oriented BHR acetabular component in a presumably “optimal” patient reduces the risk of having elevated serum metal ions but does not eliminate it. Insufficient cup anteversion seems to be the strongest associated factor of elevated serum metals. SAGE Publications 2022-10-30 2023-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10486161/ /pubmed/36314413 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/11207000221124302 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Articles Oxblom, Alexander Hedlund, Håkan Itayem, Raed Felländer-Tsai, Li Vidgren, Mathias Rolfson, Ola Brismar, Harald Careful patient selection together with optimal implant positioning may reduce but does not eliminate the risk of elevated serum cobalt and chrome levels following metal-on-metal hip resurfacing |
title | Careful patient selection together with optimal implant positioning may reduce but does not eliminate the risk of elevated serum cobalt and chrome levels following metal-on-metal hip resurfacing |
title_full | Careful patient selection together with optimal implant positioning may reduce but does not eliminate the risk of elevated serum cobalt and chrome levels following metal-on-metal hip resurfacing |
title_fullStr | Careful patient selection together with optimal implant positioning may reduce but does not eliminate the risk of elevated serum cobalt and chrome levels following metal-on-metal hip resurfacing |
title_full_unstemmed | Careful patient selection together with optimal implant positioning may reduce but does not eliminate the risk of elevated serum cobalt and chrome levels following metal-on-metal hip resurfacing |
title_short | Careful patient selection together with optimal implant positioning may reduce but does not eliminate the risk of elevated serum cobalt and chrome levels following metal-on-metal hip resurfacing |
title_sort | careful patient selection together with optimal implant positioning may reduce but does not eliminate the risk of elevated serum cobalt and chrome levels following metal-on-metal hip resurfacing |
topic | Original Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10486161/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36314413 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/11207000221124302 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT oxblomalexander carefulpatientselectiontogetherwithoptimalimplantpositioningmayreducebutdoesnoteliminatetheriskofelevatedserumcobaltandchromelevelsfollowingmetalonmetalhipresurfacing AT hedlundhakan carefulpatientselectiontogetherwithoptimalimplantpositioningmayreducebutdoesnoteliminatetheriskofelevatedserumcobaltandchromelevelsfollowingmetalonmetalhipresurfacing AT itayemraed carefulpatientselectiontogetherwithoptimalimplantpositioningmayreducebutdoesnoteliminatetheriskofelevatedserumcobaltandchromelevelsfollowingmetalonmetalhipresurfacing AT fellandertsaili carefulpatientselectiontogetherwithoptimalimplantpositioningmayreducebutdoesnoteliminatetheriskofelevatedserumcobaltandchromelevelsfollowingmetalonmetalhipresurfacing AT vidgrenmathias carefulpatientselectiontogetherwithoptimalimplantpositioningmayreducebutdoesnoteliminatetheriskofelevatedserumcobaltandchromelevelsfollowingmetalonmetalhipresurfacing AT rolfsonola carefulpatientselectiontogetherwithoptimalimplantpositioningmayreducebutdoesnoteliminatetheriskofelevatedserumcobaltandchromelevelsfollowingmetalonmetalhipresurfacing AT brismarharald carefulpatientselectiontogetherwithoptimalimplantpositioningmayreducebutdoesnoteliminatetheriskofelevatedserumcobaltandchromelevelsfollowingmetalonmetalhipresurfacing |