Cargando…
Methodological and Ethical Implications of Using Remote Data Collection Tools to Measure Sexual and Reproductive Health and Gender-Based Violence Outcomes among Women and Girls in Humanitarian and Fragile Settings: A Mixed Methods Systematic Review of Peer-Reviewed Research
Purpose: This systematic review investigates the methodological and ethical implications of using remote data collection tools to measure sexual/reproductive health (SRH) and gender-based violence (GBV) outcomes among women and girls in humanitarian and fragile settings. Methods: We included empiric...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10486180/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35607868 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15248380221097439 |
_version_ | 1785102950987726848 |
---|---|
author | Vahedi, Luissa Qushua, Najat Seff, Ilana Doering, Michelle Stoll, Carrie Bartels, Susan A. Stark, Lindsay |
author_facet | Vahedi, Luissa Qushua, Najat Seff, Ilana Doering, Michelle Stoll, Carrie Bartels, Susan A. Stark, Lindsay |
author_sort | Vahedi, Luissa |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose: This systematic review investigates the methodological and ethical implications of using remote data collection tools to measure sexual/reproductive health (SRH) and gender-based violence (GBV) outcomes among women and girls in humanitarian and fragile settings. Methods: We included empirical studies of all design types that collected any self-reported primary data related to SRH/GBV using information and communication technology, in the absence of in-person interactions, from women and girls in humanitarian and fragile settings. The search was run in March 2021 without filters or limits in Ovid Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Clinicaltrials.gov, and Scopus. Quality was assessed using an adapted version of the MMAT tool. Two reviewers independently determined whether each full text source met the eligibility criteria, and conflicts were resolved through consensus. A-priori extraction fields concerned methodological rigor and ethical considerations. Results: 21 total studies were included. The majority of studies were quantitative descriptive, aiming to ascertain prevalence. Telephone interviews, online surveys, and mobile applications, SMS surveys, and online discussion forums were used as remote data collection tools. Key methodological considerations included the overuse of non-probability samples, lack of a defined sampling frame, the introduction of bias by making eligibility contingent on owning/accessing technology, and the lack of qualitative probing. Ethical consideration pertained to including persons with low literacy, participant safety, use of referral services, and the gender digital divide. Conclusion: Findings are intended to guide SRH/GBV researchers and academics in critically assessing methodological and ethical implications of using remote data collection tools to measure SRH and GBV in humanitarian and fragile settings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10486180 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104861802023-09-09 Methodological and Ethical Implications of Using Remote Data Collection Tools to Measure Sexual and Reproductive Health and Gender-Based Violence Outcomes among Women and Girls in Humanitarian and Fragile Settings: A Mixed Methods Systematic Review of Peer-Reviewed Research Vahedi, Luissa Qushua, Najat Seff, Ilana Doering, Michelle Stoll, Carrie Bartels, Susan A. Stark, Lindsay Trauma Violence Abuse Review Manuscripts Purpose: This systematic review investigates the methodological and ethical implications of using remote data collection tools to measure sexual/reproductive health (SRH) and gender-based violence (GBV) outcomes among women and girls in humanitarian and fragile settings. Methods: We included empirical studies of all design types that collected any self-reported primary data related to SRH/GBV using information and communication technology, in the absence of in-person interactions, from women and girls in humanitarian and fragile settings. The search was run in March 2021 without filters or limits in Ovid Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Clinicaltrials.gov, and Scopus. Quality was assessed using an adapted version of the MMAT tool. Two reviewers independently determined whether each full text source met the eligibility criteria, and conflicts were resolved through consensus. A-priori extraction fields concerned methodological rigor and ethical considerations. Results: 21 total studies were included. The majority of studies were quantitative descriptive, aiming to ascertain prevalence. Telephone interviews, online surveys, and mobile applications, SMS surveys, and online discussion forums were used as remote data collection tools. Key methodological considerations included the overuse of non-probability samples, lack of a defined sampling frame, the introduction of bias by making eligibility contingent on owning/accessing technology, and the lack of qualitative probing. Ethical consideration pertained to including persons with low literacy, participant safety, use of referral services, and the gender digital divide. Conclusion: Findings are intended to guide SRH/GBV researchers and academics in critically assessing methodological and ethical implications of using remote data collection tools to measure SRH and GBV in humanitarian and fragile settings. SAGE Publications 2022-05-24 2023-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10486180/ /pubmed/35607868 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15248380221097439 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Review Manuscripts Vahedi, Luissa Qushua, Najat Seff, Ilana Doering, Michelle Stoll, Carrie Bartels, Susan A. Stark, Lindsay Methodological and Ethical Implications of Using Remote Data Collection Tools to Measure Sexual and Reproductive Health and Gender-Based Violence Outcomes among Women and Girls in Humanitarian and Fragile Settings: A Mixed Methods Systematic Review of Peer-Reviewed Research |
title | Methodological and Ethical Implications of Using Remote Data Collection Tools to Measure Sexual and Reproductive Health and Gender-Based Violence Outcomes among Women and Girls in Humanitarian and Fragile Settings: A Mixed Methods Systematic Review of Peer-Reviewed Research |
title_full | Methodological and Ethical Implications of Using Remote Data Collection Tools to Measure Sexual and Reproductive Health and Gender-Based Violence Outcomes among Women and Girls in Humanitarian and Fragile Settings: A Mixed Methods Systematic Review of Peer-Reviewed Research |
title_fullStr | Methodological and Ethical Implications of Using Remote Data Collection Tools to Measure Sexual and Reproductive Health and Gender-Based Violence Outcomes among Women and Girls in Humanitarian and Fragile Settings: A Mixed Methods Systematic Review of Peer-Reviewed Research |
title_full_unstemmed | Methodological and Ethical Implications of Using Remote Data Collection Tools to Measure Sexual and Reproductive Health and Gender-Based Violence Outcomes among Women and Girls in Humanitarian and Fragile Settings: A Mixed Methods Systematic Review of Peer-Reviewed Research |
title_short | Methodological and Ethical Implications of Using Remote Data Collection Tools to Measure Sexual and Reproductive Health and Gender-Based Violence Outcomes among Women and Girls in Humanitarian and Fragile Settings: A Mixed Methods Systematic Review of Peer-Reviewed Research |
title_sort | methodological and ethical implications of using remote data collection tools to measure sexual and reproductive health and gender-based violence outcomes among women and girls in humanitarian and fragile settings: a mixed methods systematic review of peer-reviewed research |
topic | Review Manuscripts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10486180/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35607868 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15248380221097439 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vahediluissa methodologicalandethicalimplicationsofusingremotedatacollectiontoolstomeasuresexualandreproductivehealthandgenderbasedviolenceoutcomesamongwomenandgirlsinhumanitarianandfragilesettingsamixedmethodssystematicreviewofpeerreviewedresearch AT qushuanajat methodologicalandethicalimplicationsofusingremotedatacollectiontoolstomeasuresexualandreproductivehealthandgenderbasedviolenceoutcomesamongwomenandgirlsinhumanitarianandfragilesettingsamixedmethodssystematicreviewofpeerreviewedresearch AT seffilana methodologicalandethicalimplicationsofusingremotedatacollectiontoolstomeasuresexualandreproductivehealthandgenderbasedviolenceoutcomesamongwomenandgirlsinhumanitarianandfragilesettingsamixedmethodssystematicreviewofpeerreviewedresearch AT doeringmichelle methodologicalandethicalimplicationsofusingremotedatacollectiontoolstomeasuresexualandreproductivehealthandgenderbasedviolenceoutcomesamongwomenandgirlsinhumanitarianandfragilesettingsamixedmethodssystematicreviewofpeerreviewedresearch AT stollcarrie methodologicalandethicalimplicationsofusingremotedatacollectiontoolstomeasuresexualandreproductivehealthandgenderbasedviolenceoutcomesamongwomenandgirlsinhumanitarianandfragilesettingsamixedmethodssystematicreviewofpeerreviewedresearch AT bartelssusana methodologicalandethicalimplicationsofusingremotedatacollectiontoolstomeasuresexualandreproductivehealthandgenderbasedviolenceoutcomesamongwomenandgirlsinhumanitarianandfragilesettingsamixedmethodssystematicreviewofpeerreviewedresearch AT starklindsay methodologicalandethicalimplicationsofusingremotedatacollectiontoolstomeasuresexualandreproductivehealthandgenderbasedviolenceoutcomesamongwomenandgirlsinhumanitarianandfragilesettingsamixedmethodssystematicreviewofpeerreviewedresearch |