Cargando…

AI Evaluation of Imaging Factors in the Evolution of Stage-Treated Metastases Using Gamma Knife

Background: The study investigated whether three deep-learning models, namely, the CNN_model (trained from scratch), the TL_model (transfer learning), and the FT_model (fine-tuning), could predict the early response of brain metastases (BM) to radiosurgery using a minimal pre-processing of the MRI i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Buzea, Calin G., Buga, Razvan, Paun, Maria-Alexandra, Albu, Madalina, Iancu, Dragos T., Dobrovat, Bogdan, Agop, Maricel, Paun, Viorel-Puiu, Eva, Lucian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10486549/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37685391
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13172853
_version_ 1785103032746246144
author Buzea, Calin G.
Buga, Razvan
Paun, Maria-Alexandra
Albu, Madalina
Iancu, Dragos T.
Dobrovat, Bogdan
Agop, Maricel
Paun, Viorel-Puiu
Eva, Lucian
author_facet Buzea, Calin G.
Buga, Razvan
Paun, Maria-Alexandra
Albu, Madalina
Iancu, Dragos T.
Dobrovat, Bogdan
Agop, Maricel
Paun, Viorel-Puiu
Eva, Lucian
author_sort Buzea, Calin G.
collection PubMed
description Background: The study investigated whether three deep-learning models, namely, the CNN_model (trained from scratch), the TL_model (transfer learning), and the FT_model (fine-tuning), could predict the early response of brain metastases (BM) to radiosurgery using a minimal pre-processing of the MRI images. The dataset consisted of 19 BM patients who underwent stereotactic-radiosurgery (SRS) within 3 months. The images used included axial fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences and high-resolution contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (CE T1w) sequences from the tumor center. The patients were classified as responders (complete or partial response) or non-responders (stable or progressive disease). Methods: A total of 2320 images from the regression class and 874 from the progression class were randomly assigned to training, testing, and validation groups. The DL models were trained using the training-group images and labels, and the validation dataset was used to select the best model for classifying the evaluation images as showing regression or progression. Results: Among the 19 patients, 15 were classified as “responders” and 4 as “non-responders”. The CNN_model achieved good performance for both classes, showing high precision, recall, and F1-scores. The overall accuracy was 0.98, with an AUC of 0.989. The TL_model performed well in identifying the “progression” class, but could benefit from improved precision, while the “regression” class exhibited high precision, but lower recall. The overall accuracy of the TL_model was 0.92, and the AUC was 0.936. The FT_model showed high recall for “progression”, but low precision, and for the “regression” class, it exhibited a high precision, but lower recall. The overall accuracy for the FT_model was 0.83, with an AUC of 0.885. Conclusions: Among the three models analyzed, the CNN_model, trained from scratch, provided the most accurate predictions of SRS responses for unlearned BM images. This suggests that CNN models could potentially predict SRS prognoses from small datasets. However, further analysis is needed, especially in cases where class imbalances exist.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10486549
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104865492023-09-09 AI Evaluation of Imaging Factors in the Evolution of Stage-Treated Metastases Using Gamma Knife Buzea, Calin G. Buga, Razvan Paun, Maria-Alexandra Albu, Madalina Iancu, Dragos T. Dobrovat, Bogdan Agop, Maricel Paun, Viorel-Puiu Eva, Lucian Diagnostics (Basel) Article Background: The study investigated whether three deep-learning models, namely, the CNN_model (trained from scratch), the TL_model (transfer learning), and the FT_model (fine-tuning), could predict the early response of brain metastases (BM) to radiosurgery using a minimal pre-processing of the MRI images. The dataset consisted of 19 BM patients who underwent stereotactic-radiosurgery (SRS) within 3 months. The images used included axial fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences and high-resolution contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (CE T1w) sequences from the tumor center. The patients were classified as responders (complete or partial response) or non-responders (stable or progressive disease). Methods: A total of 2320 images from the regression class and 874 from the progression class were randomly assigned to training, testing, and validation groups. The DL models were trained using the training-group images and labels, and the validation dataset was used to select the best model for classifying the evaluation images as showing regression or progression. Results: Among the 19 patients, 15 were classified as “responders” and 4 as “non-responders”. The CNN_model achieved good performance for both classes, showing high precision, recall, and F1-scores. The overall accuracy was 0.98, with an AUC of 0.989. The TL_model performed well in identifying the “progression” class, but could benefit from improved precision, while the “regression” class exhibited high precision, but lower recall. The overall accuracy of the TL_model was 0.92, and the AUC was 0.936. The FT_model showed high recall for “progression”, but low precision, and for the “regression” class, it exhibited a high precision, but lower recall. The overall accuracy for the FT_model was 0.83, with an AUC of 0.885. Conclusions: Among the three models analyzed, the CNN_model, trained from scratch, provided the most accurate predictions of SRS responses for unlearned BM images. This suggests that CNN models could potentially predict SRS prognoses from small datasets. However, further analysis is needed, especially in cases where class imbalances exist. MDPI 2023-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10486549/ /pubmed/37685391 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13172853 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Buzea, Calin G.
Buga, Razvan
Paun, Maria-Alexandra
Albu, Madalina
Iancu, Dragos T.
Dobrovat, Bogdan
Agop, Maricel
Paun, Viorel-Puiu
Eva, Lucian
AI Evaluation of Imaging Factors in the Evolution of Stage-Treated Metastases Using Gamma Knife
title AI Evaluation of Imaging Factors in the Evolution of Stage-Treated Metastases Using Gamma Knife
title_full AI Evaluation of Imaging Factors in the Evolution of Stage-Treated Metastases Using Gamma Knife
title_fullStr AI Evaluation of Imaging Factors in the Evolution of Stage-Treated Metastases Using Gamma Knife
title_full_unstemmed AI Evaluation of Imaging Factors in the Evolution of Stage-Treated Metastases Using Gamma Knife
title_short AI Evaluation of Imaging Factors in the Evolution of Stage-Treated Metastases Using Gamma Knife
title_sort ai evaluation of imaging factors in the evolution of stage-treated metastases using gamma knife
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10486549/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37685391
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13172853
work_keys_str_mv AT buzeacaling aievaluationofimagingfactorsintheevolutionofstagetreatedmetastasesusinggammaknife
AT bugarazvan aievaluationofimagingfactorsintheevolutionofstagetreatedmetastasesusinggammaknife
AT paunmariaalexandra aievaluationofimagingfactorsintheevolutionofstagetreatedmetastasesusinggammaknife
AT albumadalina aievaluationofimagingfactorsintheevolutionofstagetreatedmetastasesusinggammaknife
AT iancudragost aievaluationofimagingfactorsintheevolutionofstagetreatedmetastasesusinggammaknife
AT dobrovatbogdan aievaluationofimagingfactorsintheevolutionofstagetreatedmetastasesusinggammaknife
AT agopmaricel aievaluationofimagingfactorsintheevolutionofstagetreatedmetastasesusinggammaknife
AT paunviorelpuiu aievaluationofimagingfactorsintheevolutionofstagetreatedmetastasesusinggammaknife
AT evalucian aievaluationofimagingfactorsintheevolutionofstagetreatedmetastasesusinggammaknife