Cargando…

Pretreatment of Mesenchymal Stem Cells with Electrical Stimulation as a Strategy to Improve Bone Tissue Engineering Outcomes

Electrical stimulation (EStim), whether used alone or in combination with bone tissue engineering (BTE) approaches, has been shown to promote bone healing. In our previous in vitro studies, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) were exposed to EStim and a sustained, long-lasting increase in osteogenic activ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bianconi, Santiago, Oliveira, Karla M. C., Klein, Kari-Leticia, Wolf, Jakob, Schaible, Alexander, Schröder, Katrin, Barker, John, Marzi, Ingo, Leppik, Liudmila, Henrich, Dirk
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10487010/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37681884
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells12172151
_version_ 1785103133402202112
author Bianconi, Santiago
Oliveira, Karla M. C.
Klein, Kari-Leticia
Wolf, Jakob
Schaible, Alexander
Schröder, Katrin
Barker, John
Marzi, Ingo
Leppik, Liudmila
Henrich, Dirk
author_facet Bianconi, Santiago
Oliveira, Karla M. C.
Klein, Kari-Leticia
Wolf, Jakob
Schaible, Alexander
Schröder, Katrin
Barker, John
Marzi, Ingo
Leppik, Liudmila
Henrich, Dirk
author_sort Bianconi, Santiago
collection PubMed
description Electrical stimulation (EStim), whether used alone or in combination with bone tissue engineering (BTE) approaches, has been shown to promote bone healing. In our previous in vitro studies, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) were exposed to EStim and a sustained, long-lasting increase in osteogenic activity was observed. Based on these findings, we hypothesized that pretreating MSC with EStim, in 2D or 3D cultures, before using them to treat large bone defects would improve BTE treatments. Critical size femur defects were created in 120 Sprague–Dawley rats and treated with scaffold granules seeded with MSCs that were pre-exposed or not (control group) to EStim 1 h/day for 7 days in 2D (MSCs alone) or 3D culture (MSCs + scaffolds). Bone healing was assessed at 1, 4, and 8 weeks post-surgery. In all groups, the percentage of new bone increased, while fibrous tissue and CD68+ cell count decreased over time. However, these and other healing features, like mineral density, bending stiffness, the amount of new bone and cartilage, and the gene expression of osteogenic markers, did not significantly differ between groups. Based on these findings, it appears that the bone healing environment could counteract the long-term, pro-osteogenic effects of EStim seen in our in vitro studies. Thus, EStim seems to be more effective when administered directly and continuously at the defect site during bone healing, as indicated by our previous studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10487010
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104870102023-09-09 Pretreatment of Mesenchymal Stem Cells with Electrical Stimulation as a Strategy to Improve Bone Tissue Engineering Outcomes Bianconi, Santiago Oliveira, Karla M. C. Klein, Kari-Leticia Wolf, Jakob Schaible, Alexander Schröder, Katrin Barker, John Marzi, Ingo Leppik, Liudmila Henrich, Dirk Cells Article Electrical stimulation (EStim), whether used alone or in combination with bone tissue engineering (BTE) approaches, has been shown to promote bone healing. In our previous in vitro studies, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) were exposed to EStim and a sustained, long-lasting increase in osteogenic activity was observed. Based on these findings, we hypothesized that pretreating MSC with EStim, in 2D or 3D cultures, before using them to treat large bone defects would improve BTE treatments. Critical size femur defects were created in 120 Sprague–Dawley rats and treated with scaffold granules seeded with MSCs that were pre-exposed or not (control group) to EStim 1 h/day for 7 days in 2D (MSCs alone) or 3D culture (MSCs + scaffolds). Bone healing was assessed at 1, 4, and 8 weeks post-surgery. In all groups, the percentage of new bone increased, while fibrous tissue and CD68+ cell count decreased over time. However, these and other healing features, like mineral density, bending stiffness, the amount of new bone and cartilage, and the gene expression of osteogenic markers, did not significantly differ between groups. Based on these findings, it appears that the bone healing environment could counteract the long-term, pro-osteogenic effects of EStim seen in our in vitro studies. Thus, EStim seems to be more effective when administered directly and continuously at the defect site during bone healing, as indicated by our previous studies. MDPI 2023-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10487010/ /pubmed/37681884 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells12172151 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Bianconi, Santiago
Oliveira, Karla M. C.
Klein, Kari-Leticia
Wolf, Jakob
Schaible, Alexander
Schröder, Katrin
Barker, John
Marzi, Ingo
Leppik, Liudmila
Henrich, Dirk
Pretreatment of Mesenchymal Stem Cells with Electrical Stimulation as a Strategy to Improve Bone Tissue Engineering Outcomes
title Pretreatment of Mesenchymal Stem Cells with Electrical Stimulation as a Strategy to Improve Bone Tissue Engineering Outcomes
title_full Pretreatment of Mesenchymal Stem Cells with Electrical Stimulation as a Strategy to Improve Bone Tissue Engineering Outcomes
title_fullStr Pretreatment of Mesenchymal Stem Cells with Electrical Stimulation as a Strategy to Improve Bone Tissue Engineering Outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Pretreatment of Mesenchymal Stem Cells with Electrical Stimulation as a Strategy to Improve Bone Tissue Engineering Outcomes
title_short Pretreatment of Mesenchymal Stem Cells with Electrical Stimulation as a Strategy to Improve Bone Tissue Engineering Outcomes
title_sort pretreatment of mesenchymal stem cells with electrical stimulation as a strategy to improve bone tissue engineering outcomes
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10487010/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37681884
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells12172151
work_keys_str_mv AT bianconisantiago pretreatmentofmesenchymalstemcellswithelectricalstimulationasastrategytoimprovebonetissueengineeringoutcomes
AT oliveirakarlamc pretreatmentofmesenchymalstemcellswithelectricalstimulationasastrategytoimprovebonetissueengineeringoutcomes
AT kleinkarileticia pretreatmentofmesenchymalstemcellswithelectricalstimulationasastrategytoimprovebonetissueengineeringoutcomes
AT wolfjakob pretreatmentofmesenchymalstemcellswithelectricalstimulationasastrategytoimprovebonetissueengineeringoutcomes
AT schaiblealexander pretreatmentofmesenchymalstemcellswithelectricalstimulationasastrategytoimprovebonetissueengineeringoutcomes
AT schroderkatrin pretreatmentofmesenchymalstemcellswithelectricalstimulationasastrategytoimprovebonetissueengineeringoutcomes
AT barkerjohn pretreatmentofmesenchymalstemcellswithelectricalstimulationasastrategytoimprovebonetissueengineeringoutcomes
AT marziingo pretreatmentofmesenchymalstemcellswithelectricalstimulationasastrategytoimprovebonetissueengineeringoutcomes
AT leppikliudmila pretreatmentofmesenchymalstemcellswithelectricalstimulationasastrategytoimprovebonetissueengineeringoutcomes
AT henrichdirk pretreatmentofmesenchymalstemcellswithelectricalstimulationasastrategytoimprovebonetissueengineeringoutcomes